MESS0035: A Guide to the EPEMC Trip Reports (original) (raw)
Related papers
EPEMC tm Benefits Ten Reasons to Consider Switching to Extended Plasma-electromagnetic Cosmology
EPEMC offers many new facets which are unavailable in BBC and standard PC/EUC. Furthermore it opens an avenue for diffusionist and catastrophist studies which are more reliant upon classical and modern high energy physics at all scales, as well as geology, astrophysics, and thermodynamics. By utilizing comparative mythology and lab-based and field-based research, EPEMC opens wide the span of human history and time for exploration of tantalizing theories, while remaining sensitive to important scientific principles and advancements. In this paper, ten (of many) advantages are listed explaining why an author should utilize the modular approach of EPEMC, and how to do so in an ethical and independent manner. The switch can be rather seamless, as the cosmology is already being adopted, piecemeal by the BBC scientific community, and as diffusionism and catastrophism have returned fully into archaeology.
Extended-Plasma-Electromagnetic Cosmology (EPEMC
The current massive paradigm shifts in Science are due to collaborative research and exposure, which increases rapidly with the advent of the World Wide Web. Almost every older paradigm has fallen under scrutiny, and new evidence emerges daily to support the more scientifically sound Plasma-electromagnetic Cosmology. By understanding how catastrophism and diffusionism are affected by massive plasma-electromagnetic events in recent changes to the Solar System Circuit, researchers will be better able to explain OOPArts, gaps in knowledge, and to simplify physics and other scientific studies, as well as close massive gaps in the literature that continue to dog Science, leaving loopholes for unscientific hypotheses, such as Flat Earth, Ancient Alien, and New Earth Creation. Ignoring the evidence harms the scientific community and perpetuates the racist history in archaeology and Egyptology, but it must be evidence examined in the light of laboratory proven physics, rather than mystical mathematics and science fiction fantasies. EPEMC is an attempt to reduction of the ‘equation’ of all variables while conforming to Occam’s Razor. While no questions in Science are ‘off-limits’ the author does not include pseudoscientific ideas to make the cosmology more appealing to the mainstream. It is, however, a paper and hypothesis for those that see the fialings of the current mainstream paradigm and seek better explanations. This whitepaper is a primer and wrapper for the hypothesis and is updated as more papers are written. Key words: Diffusionism - Catastrophism - Plasma - Electromagnetism - Pre-history
The Plasma-Electromagnetic Sky (PEMS) and HEGEME work in a synergistic effect. PEMS, as it relates to Earth is a part of HEGEME hypothesis, however is also by extension part of the Solar System Circuit (SSC), which is part of the Galactic Electric Circuit (GEC). In essence, the four levels are divisible into two: Spheres of Heaven and Spheres of Earth, which are nothing more than charge differentiated layers. Plate Tectonics is enhanced, and reframed as a membrane interaction between solids (mineral/bedrock) and gases (atmospheres), which in between is aided by a liquid-organic chemistry. Guided by the five groups of the laws of physics: Energy, Thermodynamics, Motion, Electromagnetism, and Life, this chemistry and electromagnetic interaction of energy-mass is therefore able to explain by-in-large all sorts of difficult coincidences without invoking pseudo scientific hypotheses. Instead, the cosmology is simplified, and reified into a natural cosmology of continuous extension from an active, churning core of complex chemical interaction into the cosmos, and then returns again via plasma currents (Birkeland currents, aka magnetic reconnection flux tubes), towards the Earth's poles, reconstituting a cycle of energy, life, and chemistry.
PEMC :: Tables to Correct Eyes and Quickly Answer Differences in Cosmologies
This paper is to help people who are confused about the chronology and primacy of cosmological frameworks, but are seeing how Herouni, JWST, Arp, LHC, and Gaia DR-2 are constraining SM::BBC out of the picture. The rush to unify QED, QCD, MHD, and new PEM dynamics has begun, and attempts to "steal" PEMC ideas to merge with BBC have been predicted by the author in 2017, and consequently out-maneuvered (eg, 'charged' Dark Matter). But, all along, PEMC has made consistent progress in classical EM (Maxwell/Heaviside /Steinmetz /Weber), New EM (Distinti), Plasma Cosmology (Birkeland/Langmuir/Peratt), Electric Stars (Jeurgens/Scott /Lerner) and space magnetism (Alfven), and has been compliant to IEEE and more recently AGU/Wiley "Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond. Nevertheless, people who do not know the history are confused, and most don't know the atom model came after spectroscopy, and even when EM was codified. So this paper serves as a new "EU Memo" for the 5th iteration of EPEMC//MIMS corpus. The previous is not redacted, only deprecated. That means it, like will no longer receive updates. Electric Universe Primer
The Force is a unified conceptualization of the entire active force, directive vector, or field acting upon objects and light (it is light, and needs no medium to propagate that we know of). The Force, EM for short, acts upon different scales and has many different side-studies of unique effects and scales. The equations for EM are listed elsewhere as Maxwell-Heaviside equations or more recently as New-EM (Distinti), but are also relevant in quantum mechanics as all particle ‘masses’ are measured in electronvolts. Charge is measured in Q (Coulombs) or as tension (V, voltage). Flux is measured in current (I, amperes) for electricity and gauss for magnetism.
ESTREMO/WFXRT: Extreme Physics In the Transient and Evolving Cosmos
Proceedings of …, 2006
We present a mission designed to address two main themes of the ESA Cosmic Vision Programme: the Evolution of the Universe and its Violent phenomena. ESTREMO/WFXRT is based on innovative instrumental and observational approaches, out of the mainstream of ...
Waves of the future: Superior inferences from collocated seismic and electromagnetic experiments
Tectonophysics, 1998
The advent of high-quality seismological studies of the Earth's continental lithosphere has been paralleled by an explosion in both the quality and quantity of concomitant high-resolution electromagnetic studies. The latter were inspired by technological and intellectual advances during the last decade in the acquisition, processing, modelling and inversion of particularly natural-source magnetotelluric (MT) data. The complementary nature of seismics and MT leads to rejection of hypotheses that may be tenable if only one of them is applied. Equally, inferences supported by both have stronger conviction. Perhaps most useful is when apparent incompatibilities must be reconciled by re-examination of both datasets. This is demonstrated through examples of magnetotelluric and seismic reflection studies undertaken in the last decade in many tectonic environs, from Palaeoproterozoic collision zones to passive margins to active collision zones. Some aspects of MT are explained, particularly the method's sensitivity and resolution of geoelectric directionality and dimensionality. New directions are proposed whereby greater utility of the joint datasets can occur, both at the outset during data acquisition, and in the interpretation phase in modelling and inversion. Also, laboratory measurements of seismic, electrical and rheological properties of the same rock sample will make integrated interpretation more tenable.