Popular Religion in China: The Imperial Metaphor.:Popular Religion in China: The Imperial Metaphor (original) (raw)
Related papers
How are Historical Texts to be Read? My Final Rejoinder to John N. Schumacher, S.J
Kritika Kultura, 2004
, considered "one of the most provocative books" for the 1990s decade in the 10-volume Southeast Asian History Readers, published by Iwanami-shoten in Japan. Dr. Quibuyen's professional experience ranges from teaching (University of the Philippines and the University of Hawaii at Manoa) to filmmaking and video production.
Chapman, A. (2016) Historical Interpretations
This chapter explores the nature of historical interpretation and the conceptual challenges that understanding plural interpretations can pose for pupils. A framework is proposed to enable both academic and popular cultural interpretations of the past to be considered comparatively in terms, inter alia, of their contexts, the conceptions of history that they express, their interpretive frameworks and their textual forms. The chapter outlines the kinds of conceptual understanding that pupils will need to develop in order to build rational explanations for variation in interpretation and criterial evaluations of plural historical interpretations.
2018
Bevir´s works open a window that introduces us in the discussion of contemporary exegesis through his work The history of political Philosophy 1 , specially, when he state: there are several contextual, historical approaches to texts 2 . Simultaneously, Bevir, offers us an interesting progression of the history of hermeneutics and the contextual approaches experienced during the first part of the XX century. In fact, starting the reflexion, Mark, showed the different conflicts that Cambridge School faced mainly lead by J.G.A Pocock and Quentin Skinner, and the Cambridge tradition that was working the interpretation issue. At the same time, he introduces us to Peter Laslett considering him as a kind of ¨contextualism father¨, and who had a strong influence over that generation, specially, for John Locke´s works. The inflection point in the discussion is related with the convinience of continuining to using the traditional method of interpretation or the consideration to transiting to a new one (adding a little more ¨rigor¨). While Laslett brought modernist empiricism to the history of political thought, many Cambridge historians remained more committed to elder approaches to the subjet 3 . As the reading progresses the reader can see that Skinner had interest to defend the contextualism trying to be more accurate in the analysis, we must grasp the author´s intention to address a particular question at a particular time 4 . Pocock, meanwhile, has consistenly adopted more structuralist vocabularies to suggest that language gives authors their very intentions 5 . So, for one side, we
Interlude III: On Interpretation
Theory Matters, 2016
The essays in Part III of this volume indicate to what extent critical theory draws on resources from beyond the realm of literary and cultural theory in the narrower sense, such as ecological thinking (Zapf), ethics (Attridge, Domsch, and Middeke), or complexity science (Walsh). While doing so, all contributions insisted on the particular cultural productivity of literature, which in turn inspires theoretical refl ections. All contributions in Part III thus provide good examples for the 'dispositional, as well as institutional, anchorage' (Brubaker 216) of literary and cultural theory highlighted at the end of Interlude II. The medium for this particular cultural productivity of literature is, of course, the text, just as it is, albeit with different rules, the medium for the particular cultural productivity of literary and cultural theory itself. If there is a unique selling point for the expertise accumulated in the disciplines of literary and cultural studies, it should be just this: that there is a long and very sophisticated tradition of refl ection on the role of texts in modern culture in terms of the features that can be described under the rubrics of philological comparison, rhetoric, form, or
2005
This thesis discusses one central problem: What happened to Indonesian historiography in the New Order (1966-98)? To analyze the problem, the author studies the connections between the major themes in his intellectual autobiography and those in the metahistory of the regime. Proceeding in chronological and thematic manner, the thesis comes in three parts. Part One presents the author’s intellectual autobiography, which illustrates how, as a member of the generation of people who grew up in the New Order, he came into contact with history. Part Two examines the genealogy of and the major issues at stake in the post-New Order controversy over the rectification of history. Part Three ends with several concluding observations. First, the historiographical engineering that the New Order committed was not effective. Second, the regime created the tools for people to criticize itself, which shows that it misunderstood its own society. Third, Indonesian contemporary culture is such that people abhor the idea that there is no one single truth.