Direct and moderation effects on U.S. apparel manufacturers’ engagement in network ties (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Mixed Method Exploration of Building Network Ties in the Apparel Industry
2020
Small-sized apparel manufacturing businesses who operate apparel design, development, and production businesses often experience inadequate knowledge in navigating the complex apparel industry. Key concepts in social capital theory suggest that social interactions and people-oriented organizational cultures advance knowledge sharing and network ties. This mixed method exploration of small-sized Colorado-based apparel manufacturers sought to address the research question: Is external knowledge available, and if so, do aspects of social capital play a role in the process? Study 1 involved a qualitative investigation with interviews and business documents suggesting low levels of knowledge sharing, and challenges in learning aspects of the industry. For Study 2, a quantitative analysis was conducted using stepwise multiple regression with independent variables measured by Likert-like scales involving knowledge absorptive capacity, social interaction, and people-oriented organizational ...
Forms of Network Resource: Knowledge Access and the Role of Inter‐Firm Networks
International Journal of Management Reviews, 2010
The leveraging of inter-firm networks is increasingly considered to be a strategic resource that can potentially be shaped by managerial action. In recent years, scholars have turned to the concept of social capital to understand how the transfer of knowledge occurs within and across firms. However, this has resulted in an overstretching of the social capital concept. The aim of this paper is to refine and add specificity to the current broad application of the social capital concept. It is argued that although the social capital concept explains investments in networks based on a network logic relating to sociability and socialization, it does not explain investments in networks based on a logic relating to economic expectations. These expectations result in network participation that is more calculative than networks containing social capital. The paper introduces the notion of 'network capital' to explain the resources contained within inter-firm networks that do not necessarily equate with the type of trust and obligations associated with social capital. Network capital is defined as an investment in calculative relations through which firms gain access to knowledge to enhance expected economic returns. It is argued that while network capital can be strategically managed, particularly to influence knowledge flow, the nature of social capital is such that it is very difficult to manage. It is concluded that the network capital-social capital framework opens a number of avenues in terms of future research, especially in relation to the extended resource-based view of the firm and theories of open innovation.
European Management Journal, 2011
We combine theory and empirical evidence to develop and test three related claims about how ties strength and structural equivalence affect interorganizational performance similarity. First, network partners attain similar levels of performance because direct network ties facilitate information and resource sharing, and the diffusion of organizational practices. Organizations occupying similar network positions attain similar levels of performance because they face similar competitive constraints. Second, because mechanisms underlying performance similarity implied by direct network ties and similarity in network positions are different, strength of network ties and network position affect different dimensions of organizational performance. Third, we expect that tie strength will affect aspects of performance that are more likely to be influenced by processes activated by the direct contact between network partners. We expect structural equivalence to affect more strongly those aspects of organizational performance that are more directly influenced by competition. An analysis of interorganizational networks and organizational performance within a regional community of hospitals provides evidence in support of these claims. Models estimated on a sample of 8190 interorganizational dyads suggest that the effects of tie strength and structural equivalence on organizational performance are highly differentiated and contingent on specific aspects of performance. We show that these conclusions are robust with respect to a wide variety of other factors that may be responsible for performance similarity including competitive interdependence, structural homophily, and resource complementarity.
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2010
With the social context of collaborative networks becoming increasingly important, research has broadened the traditional concept of competitiveness to include and emphasize 'soft' elements, like social capital. The social capital concept can be attained in two different contexts: intra and inter-groups. The objective of this study is to identify inter-organizational social capital elements and the relationship with collaborative network competitiveness. We intend to provide answers to these questions: (i) what are the elements that explain inter-organizational social capital? (ii) how are these elements related to competitiveness? (iii) what organizational characteristics facilitate social capital formation? A survey was conducted in the enterprises from the Brazilian Wine Industry Cluster. The data were analyzed using factorial analysis and bivariate correlations. The results point out three social capital factors that correspond to the social capital dimensions found in literature: structural, relational and cognitive. The research shows that the correlations among social capital dimensions and competitiveness are strong and significant, specially the structural and relational dimensions. Finally, implications for research and managerial practice were discussed.
Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view
Strategic Management Journal, 2002
Defining social capital in terms of the information benefits available to a firm due to its strategic alliances we present a theory of social capital that conceptualizes it as a multidimensional construct. We draw from the literature to argue that social capital yields three distinctly different kinds of information benefits in the form of information volume, information diversity, and information richness. This extends current theoretical and empirical research by specifying and empirically demonstrating three interrelated yet distinct dimensions of social capital. Firms vary in their levels of social capital not just on their structural position in an alliance network but also in the dynamics that underlie alliance formation and maintenance. More importantly, the different dimensions of social capital theoretically provide differential benefits. We establish the construct validity of our proposed three-dimensional conceptualization of social capital using longitudinal data on the population of strategic alliances formed during the period 1980-94 by firms in the global steel industry. In addition, we establish predictive validity by demonstrating that the information dimensions have differential effects on firm performance, using firm nationality as a contingency.
Strategic Management Journal, 2007
This paper employs comparative longitudinal case study research to investigate why and how strong dyadic interfirm ties and two alternative network architectures (a ‘strong ties network’ and a ‘dual network’) impact the innovative capability of the lead firm in an alliance network. I answer these intrinsically cross-level research questions by examining how three design-intensive furnishings manufacturers managed their networks of joint-design alliances with consulting industrial design firms over more than 30 years. Initially, in order to explore the sample lead firms’ alliance behavior, I advance an operationalization of interorganizational tie strength. Next, I unveil the strengths of strong ties and the weaknesses of a strong ties network. Finally, I show that the ability to integrate a large periphery of heterogeneous weak ties and a core of strong ties is a distinctive lead firm’s relational capability, one that provides fertile ground for leading firms in knowledge-intensive alliance networks to gain competitive advantages whose sustainability is primarily based on the dynamic innovative capability resulting from leveraging a dual network architecture.
Social capital and knowledge management of organizational networks
The study of five types of organizational networks aims to understand how knowledge sharing and social capital are related together to management of organizational networks. Our research questions were (1) what are the enablers and obstacles for knowledge sharing, (2) what are the connections between enablers and obstacles of knowledge sharing and dimensions of social capital, and (3) what are the managerial implications for network management. Based on findings of this study, we assume that in knowledge management and in social capital development in organizational networks different dimensions of social capital may need different kinds of development efforts. The study showed that different network types had different kinds of knowledge sharing needs, and in part similar and different enablers or obstacles of knowledge sharing. Enhancing the development of relevant dimensions of social capital the effectiveness of these enablers may be intensified in the networks.
Are networks important in order to secure a firm's strategy? – A literature review
2017
Desde las investigaciones de Granovetter (1973) acerca de los lazos débiles y fuertes en una red de relaciones, se ha escrito numerosa literatura sobre el potencial de las redes para obtener más recursos, reducir la incertidumbre del entorno y, finalmente, asegurar las estrategias en las firmas. En este artículo presentamos la estrategia de una empresa como una plataforma desde donde construir con variadas herramientas y recursos clave, y también como una plataforma de desarrollo en tiempo real, ya que está constantemente influenciada por las redes. Las redes tienen poder y sus beneficios son el resultado de una adecuada comprensión del tema por parte de las empresas. Por ejemplo, la propia capacidad para aprender de ellas y saber movilizarlas cuando es necesario. Las redes no solo influyen en la cantidad y calidad de los recursos que una empresa pueda obtener, también son capaces de influir en el entorno a fin de facilitar la movilización de estos recursos en el momento adecuado.
The Impact of Network Centralization on Relational Capital
Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan
With an increasing degree of connections among firms forming network of economic activities, it is timely to assess the potential of these upon embedded firms. This article presents empirical evidence to that end. It distinguishes between decentralized and centralized network structure that illustrate the difficulties encountered in managing an inter-firm network structure. Although considerable studies has been performed in network issues affecting firms performance, very few research analyse the complicating attributes of a centralized network structure on its effects on firms performance. Thus this article described different attributes of the centralized network and its effects on firms’ relational capital outcomes. Using social network analysis methodology this study found that certain structural position occupied by firms in network impacts on its relational capital outcome. This study is significant as it’s contributed to prudent management of resources in managing com...