Gabapentin Research Papers - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

BACKGROUND: Many clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of gabapentin and pregabalin administration in the perioperative period as an adjunct to reduce acute postoperative pain. However, very few clinical trials have examined... more

BACKGROUND: Many clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of gabapentin and pregabalin administration in the perioperative period as an adjunct to reduce acute postoperative pain. However, very few clinical trials have examined the use of gabapentin and pregabalin for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). We (1) systematically reviewed the published literature pertaining to the prevention of CPSP (Ն2 months after surgery) after perioperative administration of gabapentin and pregabalin and (2) performed a meta-analysis using studies that report sufficient data. A search of electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, IPA, and CINAHL) for relevant English-language trials to June 2011 was conducted. METHODS: The following inclusion criteria for identified clinical trials were used for entry into the present systematic review: randomization; double-blind assessments of pain and analgesic use; report of pain using a reliable and valid measure; report of analgesic consumption; and an absence of design flaws, methodological problems or confounders that render interpretation of the results ambiguous. Trials that did not fit the definition of preventive analgesia and did not assess chronic pain at 2 or more months after surgery were excluded. RESULTS: The database search yielded 474 citations. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the 11 trials, 8 studied gabapentin, 4 of which (i.e., 50%) found that perioperative administration of gabapentin decreased the incidence of chronic pain more than 2 months after surgery. The 3 trials that used pregabalin demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of CPSP, and 2 of the 3 trials also found an improvement in postsurgical patient function. Eight studies were included in a meta-analysis, 6 of the gabapentin trials demonstrated a moderateto-large reduction in the development of CPSP (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.98; P ϭ 0.04), and the 2 pregabalin trials found a very large reduction in the development of CPSP (pooled OR 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.79; P ϭ 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The present review supports the view that perioperative administration of gabapentin and pregabalin are effective in reducing the incidence of CPSP. Better-designed and appropriately powered clinical trials are needed to confirm these early findings.

Aim: To find out whether preoperative gabapentin use had a favorable effect on long term postoperative pain in patients undergoing inguinal herniorraphy. Methods: Sixty male subjects -aged between 20-40 years- who were scheduled for... more

Aim: To find out whether preoperative gabapentin use had a favorable effect on long term postoperative pain in patients undergoing inguinal herniorraphy.
Methods: Sixty male subjects -aged between 20-40 years- who were scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernioraphy under spinal anesthesia were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: gabapentin group (n=30) received single dose 1.2 g p.o. gabapentin one hour before surgery and placebo group received a placebo capsule instead. Spinal anesthesia was performed with heavy bupivacaine and all operations were
performed by the same surgeon with the same technique. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated during sitting and lying with visual analogue scale. Assessment of postoperative pain on the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months was carried out with an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS); 0 indicating 'no pain' and 10 indicating 'worst pain imaginable'. Patients who had NRS scores greater than 0 were further evaluated also with regard to the impact of pain on their daily activities.
Results: When compared with placebo group, gabapentin group displayed significantly lower VAS scores (lying and sitting) and total tramadol consumption on the postoperative 8th, 12th, 16th, 20th and 24th hours (p<0.05) and higher postoperative patient satisfaction scores (p<0.05). NRS scores on the postoperative 1st, 3rd and 6th months were lower in group 1 than in group 2 (p<0.05). The number of patients whose daily activities were adversely affected by pain was smaller in gabapentin group on the first month; however the two groups were found to be similar on the 3rd and 6th months.
Conclusion: We imply that preoperative single dose gabapentin decreases the intensity of acute postoperative pain, tramadol consumption, the incidence and intensity of pain in the postoperative six months of inguinal herniorraphy.

BACKGROUND: Many clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of gabapentin and pregabalin administration in the perioperative period as an adjunct to reduce acute postoperative pain. However, very few clinical trials have examined... more

BACKGROUND: Many clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of gabapentin and pregabalin administration in the perioperative period as an adjunct to reduce acute postoperative pain. However, very few clinical trials have examined the use of gabapentin and pregabalin for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP). We (1) systematically reviewed the published literature pertaining to the prevention of CPSP (Ն2 months after surgery) after perioperative administration of gabapentin and pregabalin and (2) performed a meta-analysis using studies that report sufficient data. A search of electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, IPA, and CINAHL) for relevant English-language trials to June 2011 was conducted. METHODS: The following inclusion criteria for identified clinical trials were used for entry into the present systematic review: randomization; double-blind assessments of pain and analgesic use; report of pain using a reliable and valid measure; report of analgesic consumption; and an absence of design flaws, methodological problems or confounders that render interpretation of the results ambiguous. Trials that did not fit the definition of preventive analgesia and did not assess chronic pain at 2 or more months after surgery were excluded. RESULTS: The database search yielded 474 citations. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Of the 11 trials, 8 studied gabapentin, 4 of which (i.e., 50%) found that perioperative administration of gabapentin decreased the incidence of chronic pain more than 2 months after surgery. The 3 trials that used pregabalin demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of CPSP, and 2 of the 3 trials also found an improvement in postsurgical patient function. Eight studies were included in a meta-analysis, 6 of the gabapentin trials demonstrated a moderateto-large reduction in the development of CPSP (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.98; P ϭ 0.04), and the 2 pregabalin trials found a very large reduction in the development of CPSP (pooled OR 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.79; P ϭ 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The present review supports the view that perioperative administration of gabapentin and pregabalin are effective in reducing the incidence of CPSP. Better-designed and appropriately powered clinical trials are needed to confirm these early findings.

A facile preparation of 2-aminomethyl-2-tricyclo[3.3.1.1(1,7)]decaneacetic acid hydrochloride 5 (AdGABA) is described. The synthesis of AdGABA involves the hydrogenation of 2-cyano-2-tricyclo[3.3.1.1(1,7)]decaneacetic acid 11, which was... more

A facile preparation of 2-aminomethyl-2-tricyclo[3.3.1.1(1,7)]decaneacetic acid hydrochloride 5 (AdGABA) is described. The synthesis of AdGABA involves the hydrogenation of 2-cyano-2-tricyclo[3.3.1.1(1,7)]decaneacetic acid 11, which was synthesized by two different synthetic routes. AdGABA was found to antagonize the pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) and semicarbazide (SCZ) induced tonic convulsions and exhibits analgesic activity in the hot plate test on mice. Although its mechanism of action is quite similar to that proposed previously for gabapentin (interaction with the alpha2delta subunit of the voltage gated Ca2+ channels), further studies were undertaken in order to clarify the precise mechanism of the anticonvulsant and analgesic effects of AdGABA on a molecular level.

Background: Storm phobia in companion dogs is a common disorder that significantly impacts dogs’ welfare. Gabapentin, the action of which is only partially understood, is widely used for its antiepileptic and analgesic prop- erties. Only... more

Background: Storm phobia in companion dogs is a common disorder that significantly impacts dogs’ welfare. Gabapentin, the action of which is only partially understood, is widely used for its antiepileptic and analgesic prop- erties. Only recently, the veterinary community began to use gabapentin to address phobia and anxiety in dogs. This study tested gabapentin to lower fear responses of dogs during a thunderstorm event.
Methods: Eighteen dogs suffering from storm phobia completed our double- blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Each dog’s behaviour was evaluated twice by his owner: once under placebo, once under gabapentin. The treat- ment was orally administered at least 90 min before the exposure. Gabapentin was given at a dose ranging from 25 to 30 mg/kg.
Results: Our results indicate a significant reduction of the fear responses of dogs under gabapentin. The adverse effects were rare, and the most frequent amongst them was ataxia.
Conclusion: In this trial, gabapentin appears to be an efficient and safe molecule that should be considered as part of the treatment plan of storm phobia in dogs.

Background: It is well known that pain is subjective symptom and postoperative pain continues prevalence worldwide, because despite all the progress has not yet been able to eradicate completely. Objective: To evaluate the adjuvant effect... more

Background: It is well known that pain is subjective symptom and postoperative pain continues prevalence worldwide, because despite all the progress has not yet been able to eradicate completely. Objective: To evaluate the adjuvant effect on postoperative pain intensity 600 mg of gabapentin administered preoperatively in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy at St. Thomas Hospital from April to August 2014. Methods: An experimental study cohort prospective randomized, controlled, double blind study in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy was performed under general anesthesia. Were randomized into two groups: gabapentin group-gabapentin 600 mg (2 hours preoperative) + analgesia morphine through pump patient controlled analgesia (PCA)-and control group-analgesia with morphine via PCA pump; morphine dose was calculated based on weight ranges to 0.016 mg/kg/h. Pain intensity scale with verbal numeric scale (VNS) of 11 points at 2, 6 and 24 hours were evaluated, the number of rescues administered postoperatively was quantified and the prevalence of adverse events in both groups was measured. Results: Seventy-two patients splitted into two homogeneous groups were recruited, the average age was 44.72 ± 6.17 years in gabapentin group and 49.36 ± 9.31 years in control group. As for postoperative pain was statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05), a difference was found in the VNS of 11 points, 4.27 ± 2.32, 1.94 ± 1.95 and 0.77 ± 1.28 in gabapentin group and 7.13 ± 2.41, 4.5 ± 2.37 y 3.25 ± 2.18 in control group at 2, 6 and 24 hours respectively; the amount of ransom administered by PCA pump during the first 24 postoperative hours was measured was 6.72 ± 5.7 for gabapentin group and 24.13 ± 47.01 for control group, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05); the prevalence of adverse effects was not statistically significant between groups. Conclusion: These results indicate that gabapentin at doses of 600 mg preoperative is a valid therapeutic option in preoperative analgesia for abdominal hysterectomy. Note that we have yet to elucidate the optimal effective dose and to present lower incidence of adverse effects.

The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of gabapentin (GBP) and different doses of rapamycin (RAPA) in an induced sciatic nerve (SN)-injury rat model. Materials and Methods: The study consisted of 7 groups:... more

The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of gabapentin (GBP) and different doses of rapamycin (RAPA) in an induced sciatic nerve (SN)-injury rat model. Materials and Methods: The study consisted of 7 groups: Control, Sham, High-dose rapamycin (RAPA-H), Low-dose rapamycin (RAPA-L), GBP, DMSO and DMSO+nerve injury (DMSO+NI). Medical treatment was administered intraperitoneally for 30 days after the induction of SN injury. Results: Significant differences (p<0.001 for all) were found in comparisons between the groups in terms of axon diameter, axon number, and neurofilament (NF) and S100 immunointensity. Among the treatment groups, the highest mean axon diameter value, close to that of the Control group, was seen in the RAPA-L group. In terms of axon number, the value closest to that of the Control group was measured in the GBP group. The NF and S100 immunodensity in the RAPA-L group was similar to that of the GBP group. The S100 immunodensity in the RAPA-L group was closest to that of the Control group. The highest conduction velocity and distal latency values were recorded in the RAPA-L group. Conclusion: The histological and electrophysiological findings observed in this study suggest that RAPA-L treatment is a promising alternative to GBP.

The closure related to the COVID-19 pandemic impacted on the management of separation-related disorder in a dog. Eight weeks before the first COVID-19 pandemic closure, the patient, an 8-year-old female neutered cross breed dog weighing 6... more

The closure related to the COVID-19 pandemic impacted on the management of separation-related disorder in a dog. Eight weeks before the first COVID-19 pandemic closure, the patient, an 8-year-old female neutered cross breed dog weighing 6 kg, was presented for nonstop barking when separated from her owners, 8 hours a day, 5 days each week. Before the first consultation, 4 years of training based on desensitization without medication helped the patient but never lowered the barking beyond two hours a day, which remains way too high to provide a correct quality of life to this dog. The patient welfare was at stake, and the neighborhood complains were growing. The patient was prescribed fluoxetine at 20 mg (3.3 mg/kg) PO q24 h. and trazodone PRN before separation at 25 mg (4.2 mg/kg) PO. A behavioral modification plan based on extinction and calm reinforcement was prescribed. Eight weeks after the treatment onset, just before the first COVID-19 pandemic closure, the dog improved significantly, lowered daily barking up to 15 minutes. During all the successive closures (i.e., one year), the dog was never left alone. When the closures ended, the barking relapsed, straight at the first separation event, reaching 1 to 2 hours daily, even though the fluoxetine had never been interrupted. Therefore, gabapentin was pre- scribed PRN before separation at 100 mg (16.6 mg/kg) in place of trazodone that triggered excitation in the patient when it was previously tried. The behavioral plan was completed with additional conditioning learning before sep- aration. The dog improved quickly to a short tolerable time of barking (i.e., 5 to 10 minutes). This outcome remains stable by the time the paper is written i.e., 3 months after the end of the closure. The patient’s evolution emphasizes two important topics in the treatment of separation-related disorder: firstly, medication is needed for most cases to lower the level of emotional reaction, and secondly, interruption in the exposition to the fearful context may have rebound effects when the context will be encountered again. The long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic remains unknown on both human and dog’s welfare. More extensive studies should be conducted to measure its impact on separation-related disorder in dogs.

Objective: Pain control in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is achieved using anticonvulsivants, mainly carbamazepine. When this drug cannot be used, other drugs like gabapentin (GBP) have been used to provide adequate pain control. To improve... more

Objective: Pain control in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is achieved using anticonvulsivants, mainly carbamazepine. When this drug cannot be used, other drugs like gabapentin (GBP) have been used to provide adequate pain control. To improve the therapeutic effect of GBP, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of associating GBP with ropivacain (ROP) analgesic block of facial trigger points in TN patients. Design: Thirty-six TN patients were randomly assigned during 4 weeks to 1 of the following protocols: Protocol I-daily oral GBP administered in a titrated dose; Protocol II-ROP applied as analgesic block to TN trigger points once a week; Protocol III-daily oral GBP plus ROP once a week. Protocol II had to be discontinued in 7/12 patients owing to insufficient pain control. Pain intensity was evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and disability was assessed by Sickness Impact Profile. Results: When compared with Protocol I, Protocol III (GBP+ROP) patients showed (1) a reduction of VAS score after 7 and 28 days of treatment, an effect that was still present 6 and 12 months later; (2) a faster reduction of VAS score using a significantly lower dose of GBP; (3) a smaller total and daily GBP dose at the end of the treatment, which resulted in a total absence of adverse side effects; and (4) an improvement of the functional well-being measured by the Sickness Impact Profile. The number needed to treat (NNT) (GBP+ROP vs. GBP protocols) to obtain 1 GBP+ROP-treated patient with at least 50% pain relief was 1.71 (day 7) and 2.40 (day 28). Conclusions: The association of GBP and ROP is safe, without side effects and results in an important clinical benefit associated to an improvement of the functional health status of TN patients when compared with GBP alone. This may constitute a therapeutic alternative for pain control in TN patients who cannot be treated with carbamazepine.

The suppression of neurovegetative response to laryngoscopy and intubation has been tried out using several pharmacological agents, such as opioids, local anaesthetics, β-blockers and α2 agonists. Gabapentin an anticonvulsant, while... more

The suppression of neurovegetative response to laryngoscopy and intubation has been tried out using several pharmacological agents, such as opioids, local anaesthetics, β-blockers and α2 agonists. Gabapentin an anticonvulsant, while esmolol is a cardioselective β1 blocker and a class II antiarrhythmic, they have shown to attenuate pressor response to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation individually. Given these variable characteristics of two drugs, the present study, a prospective randomized double blind aimed to compare their efficacy against haemodynamic response during intubation and laryngoscopy.

Although acute pain in patients with herpes zoster can be severe and has a substantial impact on healthrelated quality of life, there have been no randomized clinical trials of oral medications specifically for its ongoing treatment. A... more

Although acute pain in patients with herpes zoster can be severe and has a substantial impact on healthrelated quality of life, there have been no randomized clinical trials of oral medications specifically for its ongoing treatment. A randomized clinical trial was conducted in which 87 subjects P50 years of age with herpes zoster within 6 calendar days of rash onset and with worst pain in the past 24 h P 3 on a 0-10 rating scale initiated 7 days of treatment with famciclovir in combination with 28 days of treatment with either controlled-release (CR) oxycodone, gabapentin, or placebo. Subjects were evaluated for adverse effects of treatment, acute pain, and health-related quality of life. The results showed that CR-oxycodone and gabapentin were generally safe and were associated with adverse events that reflect well-known effects of these medications. Discontinuing participation in the trial, primarily associated with constipation, occurred more frequently in subjects randomized to CR-oxycodone (27.6%) compared with placebo (6.9%). Treatment with CR-oxycodone reduced the mean worst pain over days 1-8 (p = 0.01) and days 1-14 (p = 0.02) relative to placebo but not throughout the entire 28-day treatment period as pain resolved in most subjects. Gabapentin did not provide significantly greater pain relief than placebo, although the data for the first week were consistent with a modest benefit. By demonstrating that CR-oxycodone is safe, generally adequately tolerated, and appears to have efficacy for relieving acute pain, the results of this clinical trial provide a foundation for evidence-based treatment for acute pain in herpes zoster.

The combination of opioids and central nervous system depressants such as benzodiazepines and barbiturates has an additive effect on the frequency of oversedation and respiratory depression requiring naloxone use in hospitalized patients.... more

The combination of opioids and central nervous system depressants such as benzodiazepines and barbiturates has an additive effect on the frequency of oversedation and respiratory depression requiring naloxone use in hospitalized patients. Gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin) are frequently prescribed with opioids for their opioid-sparing and adjuvant analgesic effects. There is limited literature on the risk of respiratory depression due to the combination of opioids and gabapentinoids requiring naloxone administration. This retrospective study evaluated patients who were prescribed opioids and at least one dose of naloxone between March 1, 2014 and September 30, 2016. The primary objective of this study was to compare the frequency of respiratory depression among patients who received naloxone and opioids (non-gabapentinoid group) with those who received naloxone, opioids, and gabapentinoids (gabapentinoid group). Secondary objectives included comparing the association of ove...

Background and Objective: Pain after tonsillectomy is one of the most common complications. This study was done to compare the effect of Gabapentin and promethazine as premedication to reduce pain after tonsillectomy. Methods: This... more

Background and Objective: Pain after tonsillectomy is one of the most common complications. This study was done to compare the effect of Gabapentin and promethazine as premedication to reduce pain after tonsillectomy.
Methods: This clinical trial study was performed on 104 patients aged 7-15 years who were candidate for tonsillectomy. Patients were randomly divided into gabapentin and promethazine groups. The first group received oral gabapentin 20 mg/kg/bw, and the second group was treated with promethazine syrup 0.5 mg/kg/bw one hour before anesthesia. Pain score was recorded based on the MOPS index and recorded and compared during 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.
Results: The mean±SD of pain severity in the intervention group with promethazine at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery were 1.35±0.84, 0.9±0.87, 0.25±0.52, 0.04±0.19, respectively. Pain severity was 1.58±0.98, 1.13±0.91, 0.69±0.27, and 0.06±0.24 in gabapentin group, respectively. There was no significant difference between pain score of two groups in 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery.
Conclusion: Gabapentin and promethazine as premedication have a similar analgesic effect in patients after tonsillectomy.
Keywords: Tonsillectomy [MeSH], Gabapentin [MeSH], Promethazine [MeSH], Pain [MeSH],

In the present study, gabapentin (GBP), an anticonvulsant drug used as an analgesic to control the neuropathic pains, was incorporated with cellulose acetate (CA) and gelatin (Gel) in order to develop a potential scaffold for neural... more

In the present study, gabapentin (GBP), an anticonvulsant drug used as an analgesic to control the neuropathic pains, was incorporated with cellulose acetate (CA) and gelatin (Gel) in order to develop a potential scaffold for neural tissue engineering applications. The wet-electrospinning method was used to produce the drug-loaded three-dimensional scaffolds from CA/Gel [1:1 (w/w)] solution in the water/ethanol (3:7) (v/v) coagulation baths containing 3%, 6% and 12% (w/v) of GBP. The scaffolds were evaluated regarding their morphology, contact angle, porosity, tensile strength and cellular response. The scaffold obtained from 6% (w/v) GBP bath was chosen as the optimum scaffold for further in vivo study in a sciatic nerve defect model in Wistar rats. The results of sciatic functional index, hot plate latency, weight-loss percentage of the wet gastrocnemius muscle and the histopathological examination using hematoxylin-eosin staining demonstrated that the GBP-containing scaffold significantly enhanced the regeneration of the created injury, which demonstrates its applicability for neural tissue engineering applications.

Gabapentin has shown to be effective in animals and humans with acute postoperative and chronic pain. Yet the mechanisms by which gabapentin reduces pain have not been fully addressed. The current study performed in vivo microdialysis in... more

Gabapentin has shown to be effective in animals and humans with acute postoperative and chronic pain. Yet the mechanisms by which gabapentin reduces pain have not been fully addressed. The current study performed in vivo microdialysis in the locus coeruleus (LC) in normal and spinal nerve ligated (SNL) rats to examine the effect of gabapentin on extracellular glutamate concentration and its mechanisms of action with focus on presynaptic GABA-B receptors, astroglial glutamate transporter-1 (GLT-1), and interactions with α2δ subunits of voltage-gated Ca 2+ channels and endogenous noradrenaline. Basal extracellular concentration and tissue content of glutamate in the LC were greater in SNL rats than normal ones. Intravenously administered and LC-perfused gabapentin increased extracellular glutamate concentration in the LC. The net amount of glutamate increased by gabapentin is larger in SNL rats compared with normal ones, although the percentage increases from the baseline did not differ. The gabapentin-related α2δ ligand pregabalin increased extracellular glutamate concentration in the LC, whereas another α2δ ligand, 3-exo-aminobicyclo [2.2.1] heptane-2-exo-carboxylic acid (ABHCA), did not. Selective blockade by the dihydrokainic acid or knock-down of GLT-1 by the small interfering RNA abolished the gabapentin-induced glutamate increase in the LC, whereas blockade of GABA-B receptors by the CGP-35348 and depletion of noradrenalin by the dopamine-β-hydroxylase antibody conjugated to saporin did not. These results suggest that gabapentin induces glutamate release from astrocytes in the LC via GLT-1-dependent mechanisms to stimulate descending inhibition. The present study also demonstrates that this target of gabapentin in astrocytes does not require interaction with α2δ subunits in neurons.