FREE Utilitarianism & Kantian Thinking Essay (original) (raw)

Ethics is one part of philosophy that will always be studied, and like most subjects in philosophy, will never be viewed the same by everyone. There are so many cultures that have so many different beliefs about the way a person's life should be lived out. Things like religion, poverty, and mental health all contribute to our beliefs in ethics. Some people believe that the mental state of a person or the motive for that person committing a crime should be factors when sentencing time comes. Others think that no matter the situation, a crime is a crime, and no compassion should be felt for the guilty. In the studies of philosophy these beliefs are put into two categories: utilitarian, witch would give leeway to the guilty depending on the circumstances, and Kantian, were a crime is a crime, no matter the motives involved. John Stuart Mill (1808-73) believed in an ethical theory known as utilitarianism. There are many formulations of this theory. One which is, "Everyone should !.
act in such a way to bring the largest possibly balance of good over evil for everyone involved." However, good is a relative term. Utilitarians disagreed on what good really is. Mill made a distinction between happiness and sheer sensual pleasure. He defines happiness in terms of higher order pleasure (i.e. social enjoyments). In his Utilitarianism (1861), Mill described this principle as follows: According to the Greatest Happiness Principle The ultimate end, end, in reference to and for the sake of all other things that are desirable, (whether we are considering our own good or that of other people), is an existence exempt as far as possible from pain, and is rich in enjoyments. Therefore, based on this statement, three ideas may be identified: (1) The goodness of an act may be determined by the consequences of that act. (2) Consequences are determined by the amount of happiness or unhappiness caused. (3) A "good" man is one who considers the other man's pleasure (or pain) as equally as his own.

1. Abortion

When it comes to the topics of (rule) Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics, they both have different views to what they believe about lives being of equal moral value. ... When talking about Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics, one of the things that separates the two views is the way in which they differentiate between moral considerablility. In the case of Utilitarianism ethics they define moral considerability as any being which is sentient. ... The Utilitarianism view of abortion varies depending on how conservative or liberal the views are but in general some types of abortion are allowed u...

2. Is Adultery Moral

Can thoughts of sexual acts with others constitute adultery, can elemental sexual attractions, and what about of whom one was thinking of while performing a sexual act. If thinking about someone other than a spouse is that adultery, and if sleeping with someone other than a spouse but thinking of that spouse is that adultery. ... From a Kantian perspective, his actions are immoral since he simply denied the autonomous contribution or opinion of the other members of his family. From a Consequentialist standpoint, his actions are still immoral in that he is acting ...

3. Are moral truths relative?

The discourse on moral truth then, as it is presented in the following reading, centers around relativism and its varied forms, rebuttals to the relativist mindset, and the theories of Kantian ethics and Utilitarianism which oppose the relativist agenda. ... Relativism attempts to deny this notion which is supported by the views put forth by Kantian ethics among others which will be reviewed shortly. ... Utilitarianism is the theory that actions are to be judged solely by their consequences, and that in assessing the consequences of an act, the only thing that matters is the amount of happin...

4. Ethics in Photojournalism

Utilitarianism moral ethics theory keeps the focus of right and wrong on outcomes of doing one action over the other. ... According to Kantian principle, it is that any person would not want and like to be misled by thinking that something is true, when in reality it is not. ...

5. Virtue Ethics and Great Philosophers

In the 17th and 18th century, virtue ethics was criticized on the basis that it was simply too obscure and impractical when getting down to applying itself to the absolutes of right or wrong in the way that theories such as Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics did. ... On the other hand, the philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre attempted to resurrect thinking about virtue. ...

6. Ethical Egoism

There is Utilitarianism, which believes a person should live life in a way that produces the most "good" in society. ... There is Kantian Ethics, which believes there are moral laws that apply to everyone. ... A person just has to embrace their selfishness and make decisions based on rational thinking. ...

7. an analysis of employee monito

The most popular, and seemingly best, way to analyze cases concerning the ethics of business is to use the stockholder approach as well as the theories of Kant and Utilitarianism. ... Kantian ethics state that all people deserve to be respected. ... Under no circumstances can a Kantian ethicist say employee monitoring is within the margins of what is morally correct. ... It would take a lot of thinking and research to develop a number system to rationally analyze the different aspects and outcomes under utilitarian ethics. ...

8. Ethics

I believe it is impossible to distinguish when any given person attains his or her own humanity; in other words, the time when we can stop thinking of them as an "it" or thing, and call them an actual person. ... Rather than simply being taken in the middle of the night, the more appropriate metaphor is probably something like telling the violinist you would do that for him ten years earlier, never thinking it would actually happen. ...

Got a writing question? Ask our professional writer!
Submit My Question