Behavioural Approach to Management (original) (raw)

Last Updated : 20 May, 2026

The Behavioural Approach to Management emphasises the importance of human behaviour in organisations and views employees as the most valuable organisational resource. It focuses on understanding how individual behaviour, group relationships, motivation, leadership, communication, and attitudes affect performance and productivity. According to this approach, managerial effectiveness depends not only on technical efficiency but also on the ability to understand and manage people.

Key Factors Influencing Employee Performance and Productivity

This approach developed as a reaction to the limitations of classical management theories, which mainly stressed rules, authority, specialisation, and efficiency. Behavioural theorists argued that such approaches ignored the social and psychological needs of employees. They highlighted that workers are social beings influenced by emotions, group norms, interpersonal relationships, and job satisfaction. When these factors are neglected, it often results in low morale, resistance, absenteeism, and poor performance.

The behavioural approach promotes participative management, democratic leadership, effective communication, and teamwork. It believes that employees perform better when they feel recognised, involved, and valued. By creating a supportive work environment and focusing on employee satisfaction and motivation, organisations can achieve higher productivity, improved industrial relations, and long term organisational success.

Evolution of Behavioural Approach to Management

The Behavioural Approach to Management evolved as a response to the limitations of the classical management theories, which focused mainly on structure, authority, and efficiency. Early management thinkers believed that productivity could be improved primarily through formal rules, division of labour, and monetary incentives. However, practical experience showed that these factors alone were insufficient to explain employee behaviour and performance.

• During the early twentieth century, researchers began to observe that social and psychological factors played a significant role in influencing employee productivity.
• The Hawthorne Studies highlighted the importance of human relations, group behaviour, and employee morale at the workplace.
• Management thinkers realised that employees respond not only to financial incentives but also to recognition, participation, and supportive supervision.
• This led to a shift in focus from jobs and structures to people and relationships within organisations.
• Over time, the behavioural approach developed by integrating concepts from psychology, sociology, and human relations, making management more people oriented and practical.

Thus, the behavioural approach marked an important transition from mechanical views of management to a more human centred and socially aware perspective.

Features of Behavioural Approach to Management

**Focus on individuals: The behavioural approach emphasizes the individuals who perform jobs within an organisation rather than solely focusing on the job itself.

**Influence of social and psychological factors: The Hawthorne Experiments conducted by Elton Mayo revealed the significant impact of social and psychological factors on employee morale and productivity. This finding highlighted the importance of considering these factors in management.

**Human relations movement: The pioneers of the behavioural approach, associated with the human relations movement, emphasized that management involves working with and through people. Interpersonal relations and understanding individual socio-psychological motives were considered crucial.

**Neglect of group behaviour: While the human relations movement concentrated on the individual, it tended to neglect the behavioural patterns of groups within an organisation.

**Development of organisational behaviour: Due to the neglect of group behaviour, the field of organisational behaviour emerged. It focuses on the study of attitudes, behaviour, and performance of both individuals and groups within an organisational setting.

**Multidimensional and interdisciplinary nature: The behavioural approach is multidimensional and interdisciplinary. It draws knowledge from various behavioural sciences such as psychology, sociology, and anthropology to explain and predict human behaviour. Therefore, it is also known as the behavioural science approach.

**Contributions from sociologists and psychologists: Several notable sociologists and psychologists have made lasting contributions to the development of the behavioural approach, including E.J. Roethlisberger, Abraham H. Maslow, Douglas McGregor, Frederick Herzberg, Rensis Likert, Kurt Lewin, Keith Davis, Chris Argyris, Dubin Selznik, L.R. Sayles, and George Homans.

Uses of Behavioural Approach to Management

Some of the uses of Behavioural Approach are given below:

**Development of management thought: The behavioural approach has significantly contributed to the development of management thought by highlighting the crucial role of the human element in organisations. It recognizes that managers primarily deal with human beings and their success depends on effectively managing the human element.

**Correcting distortions of the classical approach: The behavioural approach rectifies the limitations of the purely mechanistic and technological nature of the classical approach. It emphasizes the importance of understanding individual psychology and group behaviour in achieving organisational effectiveness.

**Recognition of leadership: The behavioural approach acknowledges leadership as a critical factor in management success. It recognizes the quality of leadership and its influence on employee behaviour and performance.

Limitations of Behavioural Approach to Management

The following are the limitations of Behavioural Approach to Management:

**Overemphasis on social and industrial psychology: One limitation is that the behavioural approach tends to almost equate management with the study of social and industrial psychology. It may neglect other important dimensions of management that are not solely related to psychology.

**Discounting theory and lacking scientific validity: The conclusions drawn from the behavioural approach may discount theoretical foundations and rely heavily on radical empiricism. This approach may exhibit a clinical bias and lack scientific validity in some cases.

**Neglect of the economic dimension of work satisfaction: The behavioural approach may overlook the economic dimension of work satisfaction. It might not adequately consider the impact of financial incentives and rewards on employee motivation and behaviour.

**Short-sighted perspective on conflict: The text suggests that the behavioural approach fails to recognize the creative role of conflict and takes a short-sighted perspective. It may focus more on group-oriented approaches and be anti-individualistic in its analysis of organisational dynamics.

Comparison with Classical Approach

The classical approach to management primarily focuses on organisational structure, formal authority, rules, and efficiency. It assumes that employees are mainly motivated by economic rewards and that strict supervision and control are necessary for achieving organisational goals. While this approach improved productivity in early industrial organisations, it largely ignored the human and social aspects of work.

In contrast, the behavioural approach emerged to address these limitations by emphasizing the importance of human behaviour, motivation, leadership, and interpersonal relationships. It recognises employees as social beings with psychological needs and highlights the role of participation, communication, and supportive leadership in improving performance.

This comparison shows how the behavioural approach provides a more human centred and realistic perspective on management compared to the classical approach.

Related Articles

• Classical Approach to Management
• Systems Approach to Management
• Benchmarking