Thermophilic Dehalococcoidia with unusual traits shed light on an unexpected past (original) (raw)

Introduction

The phylum Chloroflexota, previously known as the “green non-sulfur bacteria” or Chloroflexi, is a diverse lineage in the Terrabacteria [1, 2], a major clade of bacteria whose ancestors likely colonized land early in Earth’s history [3]. Originally, the phylum consisted of a single class encompassing two orders of anoxygenic phototrophs and heterotrophs [[4](/articles/s41396-023-01405-0#ref-CR4 "Garrity GM, Holt JG. Thermomicrobia class nov. In: Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund BP, Kämpfer P, Rainey FA, et al. (editors). Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118960608.cbm00050

            ."), [5](/articles/s41396-023-01405-0#ref-CR5 "Cole JK, Gieler BA, Heisler DL, Palisoc MM, Williams AJ, Dohnalkova AC, et al. Kallotenue papyrolyticum gen. nov., sp. nov., a cellulolytic and filamentous thermophile that represents a novel lineage (Kallotenuales ord. nov., Kallotenuaceae fam. nov.) within the class Chloroflexia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:4675–82.")\], yet successful cultivation efforts have expanded the known breadth of the phylum, which now includes members with diverse physiological capacities, including respiration of oxygen, nitrate, ferric iron, and chlorinated organics; chemolithotrophic nitrite, carbon monoxide, or ferrous iron oxidation; fermentation; anoxygenic photosynthesis; and diazotrophy \[[5](#ref-CR5 "Cole JK, Gieler BA, Heisler DL, Palisoc MM, Williams AJ, Dohnalkova AC, et al. Kallotenue papyrolyticum gen. nov., sp. nov., a cellulolytic and filamentous thermophile that represents a novel lineage (Kallotenuales ord. nov., Kallotenuaceae fam. nov.) within the class Chloroflexia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:4675–82."),[6](#ref-CR6 "Moe WM, Yan J, Nobre MF, da Costa MS, Rainey FA. Dehalogenimonas lykanthroporepellens gen. nov., sp. nov., a reductively dehalogenating bacterium isolated from chlorinated solvent-contaminated groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:2692–7."),[7](#ref-CR7 "Sorokin DY, Vejmelkova D, Lücker S, Streshinskaya GM, Rijpstra WIC, Damste JSS, et al. Nitrolancea hollandica gen. nov., sp. nov., a chemolithoautotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a bioreactor belonging to the phylum Chloroflexi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:1859–65."),[8](#ref-CR8 "Mehrshad M, Rodriguez-Valera F, Amoozegar MA, López-García P, Ghai R. The enigmatic SAR202 cluster up close: shedding light on a globally distributed dark ocean lineage involved in sulfur cycling. ISME J. 2018;12:655–68."),[9](#ref-CR9 "Gaisin VA, Ivanov TM, Kuznetsov BB, Gorlenko VM, Grouzdev DS. Draft genome sequence of Chloroflexus sp. strain isl-2, a thermophilic filamentous anoxygenic phototrophic bacterium isolated from the Strokkur geyser, Iceland. Genome Announc. 2016;4:e00714–16."),[10](/articles/s41396-023-01405-0#ref-CR10 "Lee PKH, He J, Zinder SH, Alvarez-Cohen L. Evidence for nitrogen fixation by “Dehalococcoides ethenogenes” strain 195. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7551–5.")\].

Despite successes cultivating diverse Chloroflexota, molecular surveys have shown that most Chloroflexota have not yet been cultivated. For example, the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) [11] lists 12 classes and 73 orders, of which only four classes and eleven orders are represented by axenic cultures. These yet-uncultivated Chloroflexota lineages are abundant in a variety of biomes including marine [12,13,14,15], intertidal [14], and freshwater [14, 16, 17] environments, and extreme environments such as hypersaline mats [18], desert soil crusts [19], and geothermal springs [20]. An environmental meta-analysis showed Chloroflexota to be among the most abundant bacteria represented in both metagenomes [21] and metatranscriptomes from many biomes, including geothermal springs, the terrestrial subsurface, and bioreactors, with the metatranscriptomes suggesting high metabolic activity in situ [22]. Given the metabolic diversity, broad environmental distribution, abundance, and relative lack of axenic cultures of Chloroflexota, greater efforts are needed to better understand their physiology, ecology, and evolutionary history, particularly those belonging to lineages with few or no isolates.

One such lineage is the order Tepidiformales, previously described under the partially synonymous names GTDB order o_UBA2991, TK10, TK17, TK30, and OLB14. The first 16S rRNA gene sequences representing this order were recovered from marine sponges [23] where they are often part of the core microbiome [24]. Subsequently, additional sequences were retrieved from geothermal springs [25, 26], marine and freshwater environments, and soils. The lack of a cultured representative for this lineage prevented formal taxonomic description until recently, with the isolation of Tepidiforma bonchosmolovskayae from a geothermal spring as the sole cultivated member [27]. However, with only a single cultured representative, this group remains understudied, and its characteristics, diversity, and evolution largely unknown.

Here we report the isolation of two new species of Tepidiforma from hot springs, and provide insights into their physiology, ecology, and evolutionary history. Phylogenomic analyses placed this lineage as an order within the class Dehalococcoidia, and showed that it is widely distributed, with high prevalence in sediments and soils. A combination of cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET), exometabolomics, and stable isotope probing coupled with cavity ring-down spectroscopy and nanometer-scale secondary ion mass spectrometry (nanoSIMS), revealed three unusual traits among members of the Chloroflexota/Dehalococcoidia, namely flagellar motility, a peptidoglycan-containing cell envelope, and metabolic activity on aromatics and plant-associated compounds, including recalcitrant organic matter. We then traced flagellar motility and peptidoglycan biosynthesis to the ancestor of the class and documented their loss, followed by expansion and diversification of the Dehalococcoidia in the global oceans.

Results and discussion

Two new Tepidiforma species expand on a small number of cultivated Dehalococcoidia

Two bacterial strains were isolated from terrestrial geothermal springs by plating benthic mat and sediment slurries onto R2A medium and were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing as members of the recently described genus Tepidiforma [27]. Strain YIM 72310T was isolated from a microbial mat collected from Hamazui (Frog Mouth) Hot Spring in Rehai National Park, Tengchong, Yunnan Province, south-west China. Strain G233T was isolated from sediment collected ~20 cm below the water level from the source pool of Great Boiling Spring (GBS), Nevada, USA.

Genomes of all Tepidiforma species ranged between 2.74 and 2.77 Mbp (see Supplementary Note 1) and enabled identification of the new isolates as novel species in the genus Tepidiforma, with ANI values well below suggested species delineation guidelines [28]. These new species are herein proposed as Tepidiforma flava YIM 72310T and Tepidiforma thermophila G233T (Fig. 1). To address the phylogenetic and taxonomic position of the genus, a large-scale phylogenomic analysis of the Chloroflexota was performed, leveraging the GTDB release 202 [11], which contains 694 high-quality Chloroflexota genomes, with the majority (>650) represented by metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from uncultivated taxa. Of these, 392 high-quality species representatives were included in our phylogenomic reconstruction (Fig. S1 and Table S1), which used 120 conserved marker proteins that were concatenated, partitioned, and analyzed under individual evolutionary models, using maximum likelihood. This analysis resulted in a robust, well-supported phylogeny for the phylum (Fig. S1). Further discussion of the phylogenetic and taxonomic structure of the Chloroflexota is included in Supplementary Note 2. The two new species, T. bonchosmolovskayae, and 148 additional high-quality genomes (nine derived from isolates) were placed within the class Dehalococcoidia (Fig. 1b and Table S2). Together, these data support the designation of this lineage as the order Tepidiformales, containing a single family, Tepidiformaceae, in the class Dehalococcoidia (Fig. 1a, b).

Fig. 1: Phylogenetic placement and environmental distribution of Tepidiforma in the class Dehalococcoidia.

figure 1

a Subtree of the order Tepidiformales, extracted from the maximum-likelihood phylogeny for the Dehalococcoidia (b), with overall genome relatedness indices, Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and Average Amino Acid Identity (AAI), indicated for the two novel Tepidiforma species, T. thermophila and T. flava compared to other members of the order. Branch support was inferred from 1000 replicates each using Shimodaira-Hasegawa approximate Likelihood Ratio Test (SH-aLRT) and ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot) support and is indicated at nodes as (SH-aLRT/UFBoot). The scale bar indicates the number of amino acid changes per site. b Maximum-likelihood phylogeny for the class Dehalococcoidia, constructed from a concatenation of 120 conserved bacterial markers (Bac120 dataset), with partitioning per marker and application of independent evolutionary models per partition. Each taxon represents a single species-level group, using the highest quality genome as representative where cultivated representatives are lacking, and cultivated members of the Chloroflexota from other classes were included as outgroups. All genomes derived from isolates are indicated in bold (nine in Dehalococcoidia). The scale bar indicates the number of amino acid changes per site, and supported branches are indicated with dots at nodes (support from 1000 replicates using SH-aLRT and UFBoot). GenBank assembly accession numbers and GTDB associated taxon identifiers are indicated for each taxon included in the analysis. The order Tepidiformales (a) is shaded in red and indicated with red branches, while other orders from diverse environments within the class are shaded in gray, and the Marine Radiation is shaded in blue. Confidently identified SAR202 lineages are labeled in blue with an asterisk in the key and indicated with blue branches. Biomes from which genomes were recovered, or species were isolated from, are indicated by colored dots in the outer ring. c Global environmental distribution of the family Tepidiformaceae and genus Tepidiforma based on amplicon sequence variants from the Earth Microbiome Project.

Full size image

Environmental distribution and phylogenomics of Dehalococcoidia supports transitions into saline and marine habitats

Despite the class Dehalococcoidia being largely associated with marine environments [1, 29, 30], biome data associated with Dehalococcoidia genomes indicate a wide environmental distribution for this class and the order Tepidiformales (Fig. 1b). MAGs splitting from basal nodes (orders 1–15) are derived from diverse environments, consistent with a terrestrial origin of the Terrabacteria and phylum Chloroflexota, while shallow-branching taxa (orders 16–25) are almost exclusively from marine environments (Fig. 1b). This evolutionary pattern is mirrored in the order Tepidiformales, where taxa splitting at basal nodes are thermophilic isolates or MAGs from terrestrial thermal environments, and genomes at shallow-branching nodes (genera SLAK01 and UBA2991) were recovered from a hypersaline soda lake, marine water, or sponges (Fig. 1b).

To further interrogate the distribution of this lineage, we identified amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) from the Earth Microbiome Project (EMP) (see Supplementary Note 3). SILVA lineages OLB14 and TK30 were retained, while the neighboring lineages TK17, TK10, and N9D0 were excluded as they could not confidently be mapped to the family or order (Table S3). This analysis revealed insights into the geographic distribution of the Tepidiformaceae and their presence in different biomes, as defined through three levels within the EMP ontology (empo) (for explanation of the EMP database and empo categories, see Supplementary Note 3 and [31]). Based on EMP data, the Tepidiformaceae are globally distributed (Table S3 and S4), with the highest prevalence in the empo-2 categories non-saline (30%) (Fig. 1c), plant (22%), and saline (16%), albeit at low relative abundance (<1%) (Fig. S2 and Table S3, S4). At the level empo-3, the family was most prevalent in the plant rhizosphere (89%), followed by soils (65%), saline sediments (32%), and non-saline sediments (31%). However, the biome coverage of the EMP is limited, so this inventory should be treated as preliminary. For example, although Tepidiformaceae are prevalent in marine sponges (Fig. 1b), sponges are not included in the EMP animal microbiome dataset. Most members of the genus Tepidiforma were detected in alkaline pH soils or waters (8.65–9.22) or terrestrial geothermal springs with temperatures similar to the growth range for Tepidiforma isolates (35.8–68 °C) (Fig. S2 and Table S3, S4).

Our analyses provide strong evidence for the presence of older lineages in Dehalococcoidia (orders 1–15), including Tepidiformales (order 8), in diverse environments, with a major one-way radiation into the oceans (“Marine Radiation”, orders 16–25, including pelagic, sponge, and hydrothermal vent communities). Our interpretations contradict a recent analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences from Dehalococcoidia genomes [32], which proposed an earlier divergence of marine cluster 1, and subsequent divergence between marine cluster 2 (including the orders JdFR-54 [order 14 in Fig. 1] and GIF9 [order 11 in Fig. 1]), and a terrestrial cluster consisting of members of the Dehalococcoidales (order 10 in Fig. 1b). However, these marine “clusters” were not consistently monophyletic in 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic reconstructions [32] and they were not recovered in our genome-based analyses, as high-quality representatives of groups included in marine cluster 2 were not monophyletic (and not solely marine-associated), and representatives of marine cluster 1 were of too low quality to be included in our analyses. The results from this study do align with a previous hypothesis of a freshwater origin of major groups of pelagic Dehalococcoidia and their subsequent transition to saline/marine environments [17]. This interpretation is consistent with the predisposition of marine Dehalococcoidia, including the SAR202 lineage, to accumulate genes for the degradation of recalcitrant organic matter of terrestrial origin [15, 33] (see below), an unusual genomic remnant of a terrestrial ancestry.

Flagellar motility and cell ultrastructure are unique among known Chloroflexota and Dehalococcoidia

Phenotypic experiments and cryo-ET (Fig. 2) of the novel Tepidiforma species revealed traits that are unusual among cultivated Chloroflexota and Dehalococcoidia, including flagellar motility and cell envelopes containing peptidoglycan. Flagellar motility was observed in cultures of both novel isolates of Tepidiforma and reported previously for T. bonchosmolovskayae. Similarly, 2-dimensional cryo-EM images revealed a flagellum for strain YIM 72310T (Fig. 2b). These Tepidiforma isolates are the only members of the Chloroflexota known to possess flagella. Many cultivated members of the Chloroflexota are considered non-motile [7, 34, 35], although gliding motility in this phylum is well known, particularly in the filamentous Chloroflexia [9, 36,37,38,39]. Despite these observations based on isolates of Chloroflexota, environmental genomics studies have improved representation of the diversity across the phylum and revealed flagellar gene clusters in some Chloroflexota genomes [17, 36, 40,41,42]. However, direct evidence for flagella in members of the phylum is so far limited to the genus Tepidiforma (Fig. 2b and noted previously in [27]).

Fig. 2: Cryo-electron tomography of the strains G233T (T. thermophila) and YIM 72310T (T. flava).

figure 2

Cells of strains G233T (a) and YIM 72310T (b) are rod-shaped, with polyphosphate granules (1) and conical cell poles (2). ad The cell envelope (3) consists of the cytoplasmic membrane (5), a peptidoglycan layer (6), and an S-layer (7) with unusual protein complexes (8). A flagellum (4) is visible for YIM 72310T (b). e Uniform tetragonal lattice of the S-layer of YIM 72310T. f Sacculus (9) of strain YIM 72310T formed by cell lysis and enzymatic digestion with trypsin with rounded cell poles (10).

Full size image

Cryo-tomograms of the Tepidiforma strains also revealed, from in to out, a 7 nm cytoplasmic membrane, a 40 nm periplasm containing a ~20 nm layer suggestive of peptidoglycan, and an S-layer (Fig. 2c and d) (see Supplementary Note 4 for further description), consistent with transmission electron micrographs (TEMs) of T. bonchosmolovskayae cells [27]. Here, we present direct evidence that the cell envelopes of the new Tepidiforma strains do indeed contain peptidoglycan: (i) TEMs of purified sacculi [43] formed by cell lysis and enzymatic digestion with trypsin (Fig. 2f); (ii) inhibition of growth by β-lactam antibiotics (Fig. S3); and (iii) a cell-wall hydrolysate containing threonine, alanine, and proline as major amino acids, and glycine and valine as minor amino acids. However, no diaminopimelic acid (DAP) or lysine was identified from the hydrolysate. This unusual finding coupled with the annotation of the DAP-type peptidoglycan biosynthesis pathway may suggest the use of modified amino acids in their cell envelopes, justifying further inquiry.

Cryo-ET also revealed other structural features that are distinct from known organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia. Members of the order Dehalococcoidales range in cell shape from irregular discs (Dehalococcoides mccartyi [44, 45]) to irregular or slightly flattened cocci (Dehalogenimonas spp [6, 45, 46]). In contrast, cells of Tepidiforma are rod-shaped and range in size between 1.0 and 2.5 µm long by 0.2–0.4 µm wide and contain unusual cone-like structures at cell apices, similar to cells of T. bonchosmolovskayae. Sacculi lacked these cone-like structures, confirming they are likely formed by the S-layer and not peptidoglycan (Fig. 2f). The S-layer surrounding the cells was uniform and 2D Fourier transforms revealed a tetragonal lattice (Fig. 2e). This is similar to some cultivated Dehalococcoidaceae species [45], but unlike other Chloroflexota where hexagonal S-layers only cover cell apices [39].

Unusual protein complexes, spaced at ~9 nm, were observed on both sides of the S-layer (Fig. 2d). As several members of the class Dehalococcoidia respire organohalides [6, 32, 36, 44, 47,48,49], we considered the possibility that these protein complexes may represent a dehalogenation apparatus. However, no distinct densities were observed associated with the cytoplasmic membrane, and, like other members of this class outside of the Dehalococcoidales, the Tepidiforma genomes had no identifiable homologs of any components of the reductive dehalogenase protein complexes included in the Reductive Dehalogenase Database (RDaseDB [48]).

Both species also had intracellular polyphosphate granules at cell division planes that were ~200 nm in diameter (Fig. 2 and [27]) and genes involved in polyphosphate synthesis and degradation [50, 51] were present in all Tepidiforma genomes (see Supplementary Note 4 for details). Polyphosphate plays an important role in oligotrophic environments as an energy storage compound [16, 50, 51], regulates cell cycle exit during starvation [51], and is also known to be important for flagellar motility [50], possibly playing a role in synthesis, stability, or function of the flagellar motor [52].

Overall, the unusual traits of Tepidiforma, especially flagellar motility and peptidoglycan-containing cell envelopes, are unexpected for members of the phylum and class, respectively. For this reason, the phylogenetic distribution and evolutionary history of these traits, along with the metabolic capacity of the new Tepidiforma species, were further investigated.

Molecular remnants of flagellar motility are ancestral in Dehalococcoidia and pervasive in the Chloroflexota

To evaluate the distribution of flagellar genes in the Dehalococcoidia, all genomes for the class included in this study were compared. Genes encoding flagellar machinery were grouped (Fig. 3) into a core set of often co-occurring genes (teal-colored genes), regulatory genes (green-colored genes), and other genes that were intermittently present (gray-colored genes). All genomes (243) representing 140 species clusters, except for the sole high-quality representative of GCA_009391415.1 sp. 009392785, lacked the flgH and flgI genes that encode L-and P-rings, consistent with the monoderm Gram-positive cell envelope structure of Chloroflexota. The core gene set (>90% of the 25 genes) was frequently observed in the taxa splitting off at the basal nodes within the class (orders 1, 2, 3, 7), but individual genes were rarely present in other members of the class (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3: Distribution and evolution of motility within the class Dehalococcoidia.

figure 3

a Cladogram inferred from the Dehalococcoidia phylogenomic tree serving as evolutionary hypothesis for ancestral character state reconstruction. Orders from diverse environments are shaded in gray, while the Tepidiformales are shaded in red and indicated with red branches, and the Marine Radiation is shaded in blue, with SAR202 lineages indicated with blue branches and asterisks and blue text in the key. The presence of a core structural flagellar gene set (Group 1 genes) in genomes belonging to the class is indicated with gradations of teal in the inner track, while the presence of regulatory genes (Group 2 genes) is indicated in gradations of green in the middle track. Other motility genes that are intermittently found within the class are indicated in gray in the outer track. Predicted consensus gains (dots outlined with green) or losses (dots outlined with red) of the full or partial core structural set are indicated at nodes where predictions for individual genes agree. b Schematic of conserved flagellar genes found in the genomes of the Dehalococcoidia. Conserved structural and regulatory proteins are indicated based on their relative positions on the flagellum schematic while those components found intermittently are indicated in gray, and components being absent from the genomes are indicated in light yellow, specifically FlgH and FlgI, forming the L- and P-rings.

Full size image

From the observed distribution patterns, we reconstructed likely ancestral character states for these genes. The core flagellar gene set was predicted in the last common ancestor of the class, with a few partial or full gene losses in taxa branching at basal nodes (i.e., ancestors of orders 3–6 and 9, and within Tepidiformales), and a full loss of the cluster in the last common ancestor of orders 10–25, prior to the diversification of the lineages including the Dehalococcoidales and the Marine Radiation comprising orders 16–25 (Fig. 3a). Within the Tepidiformales and its sister order DSGV01, the core flagellar gene set was present in all genomes retrieved from geothermal environments, with partial losses of flagellar genes predicted at ecological transitions to cooler environments (e.g., genera SLAK01 and UBA2991).

As Tepidiforma is aerobic or microaerophilic and often associated with phototrophic mats, it is possible that flagellar motility could be selected for by changes in conditions during redox cycling in photosynthetic mats. Diel vertical migration via gliding motility of Chloroflexus aurantiacus [53] and other taxa within chlorophototrophic mats has been a topic of interest for nearly half a century [53]. In these settings, aerobes typically accumulate in the uppermost layers of mats at night [53], as lower layers become anoxic [54, 55]. In contrast, O2 supersaturation occurs within photosynthetic layers during high light, leading to accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [54], driving many microorganisms deeper into mats and sediments. All three members of the Tepidiforma could also potentially alleviate ROS-induced damage by using glutathione peroxidase, which is conserved in Tepidiforma, and superoxide dismutase, which is conserved in the Tepidiformales (Table S5).

Investigation of the genomic architecture and synteny of the flagellar genes revealed three gene clusters (Fig. 4). Cluster 1 (purple) consisted of genes associated with the flagellar filament and filament cap (fliC, fliD, and fliS); Cluster 2 (red) consisted of some fli and flg genes; while Cluster 3 (gold) contained the remainder of the fli and flg genes, along with mot and flh genes (Fig. 4a). Most of the more fragmented genomes could be shuffled to reflect a similar structure (Fig. 4b), except for SpSt-233 sp. 011053995, where assembled contigs did not reflect this organization, and the sister taxa SHYQ01 sp. 903917615 and SURF-43 sp. 004297315, which each contained an insertion in Cluster 1 (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4: Gene cluster architecture and evolutionary hypotheses for motility within the Dehalococcoidia.

figure 4

a Three non-contiguous gene clusters encoding motility genes were identified in Dehalococcoidia genomes. Both clusters 2 and 3 contained non-syntenic regions nested within the cluster, while fliE (cluster 2) and fliM (cluster 3) was irregularly present, and some genomes encoded multiple copies of fliC (cluster 1). b The genomic organization of gene clusters within Dehalococcoidia genomes, plotted against the evolutionary relatedness of the class as inferred from the phylogenomic tree. The branch leading to the ancestor of the Dehalococcoidales and the Marine Radiation is collapsed on the cladogram, as none of these genomes contained the consistent gene clusters observed in predicted motile Dehalococcoidia. c Summary cladograms for individual maximum-likelihood trees (Supplementary Data file 1) for representative sequences from each cluster (genes indicated in green in a). Branches supported with both SH-aLRT (>0.9) and UFBoot (>95%) are indicated with filled dots at nodes. Lineages belonging to the Dehalococcoidia are indicated with red branches. Lineages classified as belonging to classes in the Chloroflexota based on GTDB are reflected in black taxon names, and those lineages belonging to phyla outside of the Chloroflexota are indicated in gray taxon names.

Full size image

To gain insight into the evolutionary history of the flagellar genes within the class, proteins encoded by the different flagellar gene clusters were selected for phylogenetic analyses: flagellin FliC (Cluster 1), the flagellum-specific ATP synthase FliI (Cluster 2), the motor complex protein MotA, and the flagellar biosynthesis proteins FliP and FlhA (Cluster 3) (see Supplementary Note 5 for more detail). Phylogenetic analyses showed that Dehalococcoidia homologs consistently grouped with other members of the Chloroflexota, particularly in the classes Anaerolineae, Chloroflexia, FW602-bin22, UBA2235, and UBA6077. When other phyla grouped close to sequences from the Chloroflexota, these mostly belonged to other Terrabacteria [2], such as Actinobacteriota, Armatimonadota, Cyanobacteria, Eremiobacterota, and Firmicutes (syn. Bacillota). There were, however, some examples of putative horizontal transfer events between some Gracilicutes or Terrabacteria and Dehalococcoidia. For example, some FliC copies from Dehalococcoidia grouped closest to Proteobacteria sequences (syn. Pseudomonadota), while one lineage of FliI sequences from Dehalococcoidia grouped closest to sequences from the Planctomycetota (Fig. 4c). However, the widespread presence of these flagellar genes within the Chloroflexota suggests that flagellar motility may have been ancestral within the phylum, and was mainly inherited vertically with several losses, homologous replacements, and duplications occurring within the phylum. Overall, these phylogenies reflect a complex evolutionary history for flagellar genes in the Chloroflexota that warrants further investigation but may also reflect the limitations to robust reconstruction of evolutionary paths of single genes in deep time.

Peptidoglycan biosynthesis is an ancestral trait in the Dehalococcoidia

A layer suggestive of peptidoglycan, ranging between 20 and 30 nm in thickness, was visible by electron microscopy in all three cultivated Tepidiforma species, and was herein confirmed as peptidoglycan. The non-thermophilic Dehalococcoidia genera Dehalococcoides and Dehalogenimonas have either been reported to lack peptidoglycan in their cell envelopes [44, 45, 56], or no data are available regarding envelope architecture [6, 46, 47]. The apparent lack of peptidoglycan was previously also supported by the available genome data, as evidence for peptidoglycan biosynthesis has been absent from published genomes [1, 36, 57]. In addition, all Tepidiformales genomes lacked key genes for the synthesis of a Gram-negative outer membrane, supporting their designation as monoderms, matching the current paradigm for Chloroflexota genomes [40], and other members of the Terrabacteria [58].

To probe the likely cell envelope structure across Dehalococcoidia, we interrogated the genomes for peptidoglycan biosynthetic potential. Nearly all genes associated with the DAP-type peptidoglycan biosynthesis pathway were present in orders 1–9 (Fig. 5, purple genes), including the Tepidiformales (order 8). In addition, the genes ddl, bacA, bcrC, and uppS were widely present within the class (Fig. 5a), suggesting DAP-type peptidoglycan biosynthesis might be ancestral within the class. This hypothesis was supported by ancestral character state reconstructions (see Supplementary Note 5), which showed a single loss of the core DAP-type peptidoglycan biosynthesis genes at the last common ancestor of orders 10–25 (Fig. 5a; including the Dehalococcoidales and the Marine Radiation)—the same node at which flagellar motility was lost.

Fig. 5: Distribution and evolution of peptidoglycan biosynthesis within the class.

figure 5

a Cladogram inferred from the Dehalococcoidia phylogenomic tree serving as evolutionary hypothesis for ancestral character state reconstruction. Orders from diverse environments are shaded in gray, while the Tepidiformales are shaded in red and indicated with red branches, and the Marine Radiation is shaded in blue, with SAR202 lineages indicated with blue branches and asterisks and blue text in the key. The presence of three sets of conserved genes is indicated on the cladogram. Group 1 genes encode proteins for the central DAP-type peptidoglycan biosynthetic pathway (purple), Group 2 (pink), and Group 3 (gray) genes encode proteins involved in peptidoglycan synthesis and other metabolic pathways for amino acids and secondary metabolites. The full Group 1 gene set is predicted as present in the ancestor to the class (purple dot with green outline), with a full loss of Group 1 genes predicted at the node reflecting an ancestor to orders 10–25. b Diagram of the DAP-type peptidoglycan biosynthetic pathway, and the relative position of enzymes encoded by the different gene sets within the pathway.

Full size image

Tepidiforma isolates exhibit broad heterotrophic activity, including degradation of aromatics

Physiologies within the Dehalococcoidia, both known and predicted, differ markedly. Though cultivated members of the class are best known for reductive dehalogenation [6, 44,45,46,47,48] or consortial degradation of recalcitrant organic carbon, syntrophic interactions have been suggested based on MAGs [13, 32, 49] and known reductive dechlorination reactions [59]. For example, some marine Dehalococcoidia that encode genes involved in the degradation of aromatic and plant-derived organic compounds have been predicted to partially degrade terrestrial recalcitrant organic carbon (e.g., alicyclic compounds [15]), where the products can then be used by other community members [15, 33, 57, 60, 61].

To determine whether the new Tepidiforma species play a role in the metabolism of recalcitrant organic matter and improve our general understanding of the metabolic capacity of Tepidiforma, routine physiological characterization and omics-informed growth experiments were coupled with exometabolomics and targeted stable isotope experiments. Both strains only grew chemoorganotrophically under oxic conditions (Table S8), and their genomes encoded no known homologs of genes for autotrophy, phototrophy, or use of alternative terminal electron acceptors, including organohalides (Table S6S8; see Supplementary Note 6 for details), unlike the organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidales, and many anaerobic marine Dehalococcoidia that encode the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway [1, 29]. In contrast, the closest relative, T. bonchosmolovskayae was described as a facultative chemolithoautotroph capable of using siderite (FeCO3) as the electron donor, yet no carbon fixation pathway was proposed [27]. In addition, unlike T. bonchosmolovskayae [27], neither novel strain was capable of growth on any of the compounds tested as sole carbon sources (Table S9, S10, S11, and Supplementary Note 6), but several stimulated growth (Table S11) when added to undefined nutrient-rich media (2R2AW broth), which could indicate metabolic dependencies on other community members in situ. As such, two additional experiments were conducted to probe the metabolism of organic molecules: (i) exometabolomics experiments for both strains grown in R2A broth, where extracellular metabolites produced or consumed were detected with strict metabolite identification standards and statistical filtering (Fig. S4, Table S1217); (ii) growth in 2R2AW broth with added 13C-labeled substrates followed by measurements of mineralization of organic substrate to 13CO2 and intracellular incorporation using isotope imaging (Figs. 6, S5, and S6). The 13C-labeled substrates tested (i.e., amino acids, xylose, galactose, ribose, pyruvate, acetate, vanillate, lignin, hemicellulose, cellulose, and catechol) in the latter experiments were chosen based on genome-enabled predictions or by exometabolomics experiments.

Fig. 6: Metabolism of strain YIM 72310T as determined from physiological tests, isotopically labeled 13CO2 production and assimilation assays, exometabolomics and genomic predictions.

figure 6

a Growth stimulation tests performed through addition of carbon sources to 2R2AW at a concentration of 0.05% w/v, after 8 days of growth as measured by optical density at 600 nm. Statistically significant stimulation (indicated with an asterisk) was determined based on unpaired _t_-tests (p < 0.05) compared to controls for the respective experiments. b Average relative 13CO2 production from growth on 13C-labeled substrates (triplicate incubations ± standard deviations). Statistical significance (indicated with asterisks) was determined through comparison to the negative control, with no 13C-labeled substrates, with Dunn tests. c Assimilation of 13C-labeled substrates was calculated from nanoSIMS analyses of individual cells (see Supplementary Note S7). Substrate biomass assimilation of individual cells, shown in each data point was calculated using Cnet and plotted with a boxplot overlay for the average percent incorporation and the upper and lower quartile ranges. Significant assimilation of 13C (indicated with asterisks) was determined through comparison to the negative control with Dunn tests. d Dot matrix summarizing the metabolic capabilities of YIM 72310T. Substrates and products identified through exometabolomics are indicated with yellow dots, while supporting evidence based on 13CO2 production (blue dots) and assimilation (pink dots) experiments, genomic predictions (purple dots) and growth tests (green, orange, and gray dots) are also indicated. P1 Pyruvate, first carbon atom is labeled with 13C; P2,3 Pyruvate, second and third carbon atoms are labeled with 13C, FAs fatty acids, IAA indole-3-acetic acid, PAA phenylacetic acid, AAs amino acids, Nts nucleotides, Nt nucleotide.

Full size image

Based on growth (Fig. 6a and d, Table S1011, Supplementary Note 6), exometabolomics (Fig. 6d, S4, and Table S1213), and experiments with 13C-labeled substrates (Fig. 6b, c, and d, and Fig. S5), volatile fatty acids and their precursors or derivatives were consistently used for growth and/or energy generation. This was particularly evident for acetate, which stimulated growth (Fig. 6a and Table S11) and was both oxidized to 13CO2 (Fig. 6b and S5) and incorporated (Fig. 6c) (see Supplementary Note 7). The lack of a complete glyoxylate cycle encoded by Tepidiforma genomes (Table S67 and [27]) is consistent with their inability to use acetate as a sole carbon source (Table S9), and suggests its stimulatory effect on growth could be due to the production of acetyl-CoA or incorporation into membrane fatty acids. With this in mind, Tepidiforma could utilize acetate released by cohabiting acetogens in nature, similar to the well-documented utilization of acetate among other Chloroflexota [62, 63]. Although pyruvate did not stimulate growth, 13CO2 was produced and 13C was incorporated from both 13C1-pyruvate and 13C2,3-pyruvate (Fig. 6), and pyruvate was reported to support heterotrophic growth by T. bonchosmolovskayae [27]. The high levels of 13C1-pyruvate converted to 13C-CO2 were consistent with strong pyruvate dehydrogenase activity and tight coupling of glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Although neither succinate nor propionate stimulated growth of either strain, succinate served as substrate for both strains in exometabolomics experiments (Fig. 6d, Table S1213), providing some evidence for cross-feeding interactions similar to those reported previously for Roseiflexus in hot spring microbial mats [55, 64]. Furthermore, exometabolomics demonstrated metabolism of lactate and other volatile fatty acids during growth on R2A, and the formation of halos around colonies grown on solid R2A medium amended with polysorbate [65] indicated that both strains could hydrolyze polysorbate (Tween) 40 and 60. Together, these data suggest that, like other Chloroflexota, fatty acids and their precursors and/or derivatives play an important role in sustaining growth of Tepidiforma species [27].

Although no sugars stimulated growth, other experiments showed that several sugars are utilized. Based on genomic data, we predicted ribose could be transported and used for nucleotide biosynthesis via the non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway and indeed label from 13C1-ribose was recovered as 13CO2 (Fig. 6b) and in biomass (Fig. 6c). In addition, xylose was consumed during exometabolomics experiments by both strains, while only small amounts of 13C incorporation from 13C-xylose was detected by nanoSIMS. Some limited and sporadic evidence for the utilization of other sugar mono- or dimers was detected from the different experiments (e.g., 13CO2 production and 13C incorporation during growth in the presence of 13C-galactose Fig. 6c), however, these results could not be corroborated by other growth experiments or through genomic predictions. Several glycoside hydrolases (GHs) were predicted for both YIM 72310T and G233T (Table S1819), particularly belonging to GH family 13, which contains various enzymes including amylases and pullulanases known to depolymerize starch, glycogen, and other polysaccharides; however, none of the polysaccharides tested (i.e., dextrin, starch, and polysaccharides in yeast extract) could be used as sole carbon sources, stimulated growth, or reduced growth when excluded from the medium (Tables S911). Yet, some 13C from both hemicellulose and cellulose were incorporated into biomass, suggesting a role for Tepidiforma in consortial degradation of polysaccharides, consistent with the growth of T. bonchosmolovskayae on plant polysaccharides such as starch and dextrin [27], and similar to other cellulolytic Chloroflexota [5]. Yet, since these hemicellulose and cellulose preparations are derived from plant matter, the exact source of the assimilated carbon atoms could be further investigated.

Plant biomass also contains aromatic compounds, including those that are integral to the structure of lignin. Broad metabolism of phenolics and other aromatic compounds was observed with both growth stimulation and exometabolomics experiments (Tables S1113) (Fig. 6). However, despite the apparent use of aromatics by both strains during exometabolomic experiments, some related compounds accumulated during growth. For example, hippuric acid may be hydrolyzed by hippurate hydrolase (EC 3.5.1.32) to benzoic acid, while cinnamate is likely converted to benzoic acid and acetate through β-oxidation, with further processing of benzoic acid to salicylate through benzoate oxidoreductase. Similarly, _p_-coumaric acid may undergo β-oxidation to produce 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, while 3-hydroxybenzyl alcohol may be dehydrogenated to 3-hydroxybenzaldehyde, and further processed to 3-hydroxybenzoic acid through 3-hydroxybenzyl-alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.97) and benzaldehyde dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.1.28). Thus, these substrates are only partially or inefficiently metabolized, pointing to a possible role in consortial degradation of lignin or other recalcitrant organic matter [15] of plant and/or microbial origin in geothermal springs. However, vanillin stimulated growth, apparently via dehydrogenation to vanillate (inferred from exometabolomics) and subsequent mineralization, although not statistically significant, providing more compelling evidence for a direct role in lignin metabolism, particularly as growth on lignin was reported for T. bonchosmolovskayae [27]. Our growth experiments on 13C-lignin, catechol, and vanillate indicated mineralization of these compounds (Figs. S6, S5, and S6), but no intracellular incorporation was detected, though lignin and catechol adhered to the cell surface (Fig. S5), confounding nanoSIMS experiments (see Supplementary Note 7). These results are broadly consistent with the consortial nature of efficient lignin biodegradation in general [66], although high temperatures in geothermal systems might also alleviate enzymatic, kinetic, or thermodynamic bottlenecks for some of these reactions in situ [67]. Although limited genomic evidence is available to support these reactions, possibly due to difficulty in annotating proteins of novel organisms, the confirmed broad activity on these compounds is consistent with the proposed metabolism of aromatic compounds by yet-uncultivated marine Dehalococcoidia, specifically the SAR202 cluster (Fig. 1b, including orders 18 [partially synonymous with SAR202-III/_Monstramariales_], 19 [syn. SAR202-VII], 23 [syn. SAR202-VI], and 25 [syn. SAR202-II], indicated in blue and an asterisk in the key) [15, 33] and the Dsr clade [33, 57]; however, the distributions and phylogenies of enzymes associated with these degradation pathways are complex, with horizontal acquisition of these genes being pervasive (Fig. S7, S8, and Supplementary Note 5).

Plant stress hormones (i.e., azelaic acid and jasmonic acid) also served as substrates for both strains in exometabolomics experiments, while the plant growth hormones indole-3-acetic acid and phenylacetic acid (i.e., auxins) were produced (Table S1213). Although not supported by genomic evidence, indole-3-acetic acid may be produced from 3-(2-methylaminoethyl)indole (a substrate consumed during exometabolomics experiments) using activities similar to monoamine oxidase (EC 1.4.3.4), and indole-3-pyruvic acid using activities similar to indole-3-pyruvate monooxygenase (EC 1.14.13.168), while 2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid can be converted to phenylacetic acid via phenylacetate-2-hydroxylase (EC 1.14.14.54). The metabolism of these plant stress hormones, coupled with the prevalence of Tepidiformaceae in rhizosphere samples in the EMP database (Fig. S2, Table S34), provides for a possibility that Tepidiformaceae might promote plant growth or stress tolerance. However, neither cis-jasmone nor syringic acid stimulated growth of either strain of Tepidiforma (Table S11), and quantitative PCR experiments at Great Boiling Spring demonstrated that Tepidiforma inhabits exclusively high-temperature sediments and is not a significant inhabitant of riparian plant root tissue, rhizoplane, or rhizosphere (Table S20). This does not preclude the possibility that yet-uncultivated members of the Tepidiformaceae could repurpose these traits for plant-growth promotion.

Several lines of evidence supported the utilization of additional substrates for growth of the new Tepidiforma strains. For both strains, exclusion of yeast extract or casamino acids from the medium resulted in less growth (Table S10), and incorporation of carbon from 13C-labeled algal amino acids was observed (Fig. 6c). Several amino acids and derivatives were also identified as substrates for growth during exometabolomics experiments (Table S1213). This is consistent with the use of peptides and other amino acid-containing substrates like yeast extract and peptone by T. bonchosmolovskayae [27] and other Chloroflexota [34, 35, 62, 68].

Overall, the large number of compounds used by the Tepidiforma strains, but lack of growth on defined sole carbon sources under the conditions used here is consistent with the complex nutritional profiles of other Chloroflexota [34, 44, 62]. This general pattern suggests broad heterotrophic activity and metabolic interdependency with cohabiting microorganisms in nature.

Conclusions

This study combines the isolation and characterization of two novel thermophilic Dehalococcoidia with a comprehensive evolutionary and comparative genomic investigation of the class. Flagellar motility and a peptidoglycan-containing cell envelope were two notable traits observed in the new strains, confirming the genus Tepidiforma as the sole cultivated taxon with flagellar motility in the Chloroflexota and peptidoglycan within the Dehalococcoidia. Despite the previous view that these traits are absent in the Dehalococcoidia/Chloroflexota, we show that they are, in fact, ancestral within the class, and were lost preceding the successful adaptive radiations of the Dehalococcoidales and the Marine Radiation that are the most widespread and abundant Dehalococcoidia on modern Earth. As both flagellar motility and peptidoglycan biosynthesis are energy-intensive, their loss during genome reductions, as evidenced by overall smaller genomes within these orders (Table S2), presumably lowered genetic load and increased fitness of the progenitor of this lineage in niches where flagellar motility and peptidoglycan were not selected for, namely the marine pelagos. Motility is rare among pelagic oligotrophs with small cell size due to nutrient limitations and the high effect of Brownian motion on small cells, resulting in inefficient swimming at a high energy cost [69,70,[71](/articles/s41396-023-01405-0#ref-CR71 "Noell SE, Brennan E, Washburn Q, Davis Ii EW, Hellweger FL, Giovannoni SJ. Differences in the regulatory strategies of marine oligotrophs and copiotrophs reflect differences in motility. Environ Microbiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16357

            .")\]. Many modern pelagic _Dehalococcoidia_ fit this paradigm because MAGs have often been recovered from small cell size fractions (<0.45 µm).

The adaptive radiation of the Dehalococcoidia into the oceans would have substantially altered the microbial communities inhabiting the deep sea. Rough estimates for the divergence of well-sampled classes of Chloroflexota range between 1000 and 1500 Mya [72], and preliminary dating analyses placed the divergence between cultivated members of the Dehalococcoidaceae (i.e., Dehalogenimonas and Dehalococcoides) at ~500 Mya [32, 72]. This would place the marine radiation between 500 and 1000 Mya, which is similar to marine transitions documented in other microbial lineages, particularly marine ammonia-oxidizing archaea [73, 74], and may have coincided with the Neoproterozoic Oxygenation of the oceans and associated changes in redox-active metal solubility [15, 73, 74]. However, a recent molecular dating analysis focused on diversification of prokaryotes in the ocean, placed the date of divergence of the SAR202 lineage (composed of several orders within the class Dehalococcoidia) prior to the Great Oxidation Event, likely during an oxygen oasis [[75](/articles/s41396-023-01405-0#ref-CR75 "Martinez-Gutierrez CA, Uyeda JC, Aylward FO. A timeline of bacterial and archaeal diversification in the ocean. bioRxiv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.27.514092

            .")\]. Future evolutionary studies of key marine microbiota, like the recent multi-gene dating analysis \[[75](/articles/s41396-023-01405-0#ref-CR75 "Martinez-Gutierrez CA, Uyeda JC, Aylward FO. A timeline of bacterial and archaeal diversification in the ocean. bioRxiv. 2022. 
              https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.27.514092
              
            .")\], should strive to refine these dates coupled with expanded taxon representation to better understand the relationship between multiple adaptive radiations of marine prokaryotes and Earth-system changes that may have enabled them.

Protologues

Description of Tepidiforma flava sp. nov

Tepidiforma flava (fla’va. L. fem. adj. flava yellow, the color of colonies)

This species has the following characteristics in addition to those described for the genus. Colonies grow well on R2A medium and weak on Thermus 162 medium and T5 agar. Colonies are small, circular, convex, and pale yellow in color on all test agar media after 3 days. The temperature range for growth is 45–65 °C, with an optimum at 55–60 °C. The pH range for growth is 6–8, with an optimum at pH 7. Growth is observed at and below 1.0% (w/v) NaCl concentration. Cells are motile, and sheared flagella were observed by cryo-electron microscopy and genomes encode genes required for flagellar biosynthesis. Cell envelopes contain a cytoplasmic membrane, peptidoglycan, and an S-layer, and cell growth is inhibited by ampicillin at concentrations ≥4 µg/ml and carbenicillin at ≥8 µg/ml. Positive for oxidase and catalase. Milk coagulation and peptonization, starch hydrolysis, cellulose hydrolysis, and H2S production are negative. Tweens 40 and 60 are hydrolyzed, but Tweens 20 and 80 are not. None of the following compounds can either be used as sole carbon sources or stimulate growth: azelaic acid, cis-jasmone, citrate, dextrin, D-fructose, D-galactose, D-ribose, D-xylose, fumarate, malate, maltose, mannitol, melibiose, oxalate, p-coumaric acid, propionate, pyruvate, raffinose, succinate, sucrose, and syringic acid. Acetate and vanillin cannot be used as sole carbon sources but stimulate growth, while significantly lower growth is observed with the exclusion of yeast extract and casamino acids from the growth medium. Whole-cell hydrolysates contain glucose, mannose, ribulose, galactose, and arabinose. Strictly aerobic; unable to ferment or respire anaerobically in all experiments conducted. The major fatty acid profile (>5% of total fatty acids) contains C20:0, C18:0, C16:0, and 10-methyl C16:0.

The type strain is YIM 72310T ( = CGMCC 1.13591T = KCTC 52670T), isolated from Hamazui (Frog Mouth) Hot Spring at Rehai National Park, Tengchong, Yunnan Province, south-west China. The genomic DNA G + C content of the type strain is 71.1%. The GenBank assembly accession number for the complete genome assembly is GCA_027594505.1.

Description of Tepidiforma thermophila sp. nov

Tepidiforma thermophila (ther.mo’phi.la. Gr. n. therme heat; Gr. fem. adj. phila loving; N.L. fem. adj. thermophila heat-loving)

This species has the following characteristics in addition to those described for the genus. Colonies grow well on R2A medium and weak on Thermus 162 medium and T5 agar. Colonies are small, circular, convex, and pale yellow in color on all test agar media after growth for 3 days. The temperature range for growth is 45–65 °C, with an optimum at 55–60 °C. The pH range for growth is 6–8, with an optimum at pH 7. Growth is observed at and below 1.0% (w/v) NaCl concentration. Cells are motile, and genomes encode genes required for flagella biosynthesis. Cell envelopes consist of a cytoplasmic membrane, peptidoglycan, and an S-layer. Positive for oxidase and catalase. Milk coagulation and peptonization, starch hydrolysis, cellulose hydrolysis, and H2S production are negative. Tweens 40 and 60 are hydrolyzed, but Tweens 20 and 80 are not. None of the following compounds can either be used as sole carbon sources or stimulate growth: azelaic acid, cis-jasmone, citrate, dextrin, D-fructose, D-galactose, D-ribose, D-xylose, fumarate, malate, maltose, mannitol, melibiose, oxalate, p-coumaric acid, propionate, pyruvate, raffinose, succinate, sucrose, syringic acid, and vanillin. Acetate cannot be used as a sole carbon source but does stimulate growth. Exclusion of yeast extract from the growth medium significantly reduces growth. Whole-cell hydrolysates contain glucose, mannose, ribulose, galactose, and arabinose. Strictly aerobic; unable to ferment or respire anaerobically in experiments that were conducted. The major fatty acid profile (>5% of total fatty acids) contains C20:0, anteiso-C14:0, C18:0, and C16:0.

The type strain is G233T ( = CGMCC 1.13589T = KCTC 52669T), isolated from Great Boiling Spring in Nevada, USA. The genomic DNA G + C content of the type strain is 69.4%. The GenBank assembly accession number for the complete genome assembly is GCA_002563855.1.

Methods

Sample collection and strains isolation

The sample from which strain YIM 72310T was isolated was collected from Hamazui (Frog Mouth) Hot Spring (HMZ; pH 7.2, temperature 68 °C), located in the Rehai Geothermal Field in Tengchong County, Yunnan Province, China, at 24°57′12.6′′N, 98°26′17.5″E. The sample from which strain G233T was isolated was collected from Great Boiling Spring (GBS), located in northwestern Nevada, U.S.A., at 40°39′41′′N, 119°21′58′′W, corresponding to site E (pH 7.24, temperature 62 °C) described previously [76]. Detailed site description, sediment mineralogy, water chemistry, and microbial community composition at the sampling locations have been determined on several sampling trips and have been reported elsewhere [76, 77]. Sediment and microbial mat samples were collected with sterile spatulas and spoons, and samples were homogenized in pre-sterilized aluminum pans. Homogenized samples were dispensed into 15 ml polypropylene tubes and transported to the lab in the dark without temperature control. Once in the lab, sediment slurries were serially diluted, plated directly onto Reasoner’s 2 A (R2A) agar (containing 0.5 g proteose peptone (Difco #3), 0.5 g casamino acids, 0.5 g yeast extract, 0.5 g dextrose, 0.5 g potato starch, 0.3 g K2HPO4, 0.3 g sodium pyruvate, 0.05 g MgSO4.7H20, and 20.0 g agar per liter deionized water), and incubated in the dark at 60 °C. Isolated colonies were re-streaked several times to obtain axenic cultures. The purified strains were routinely cultured on either R2A or a double concentration R2A supplemented with Wolfe’s Vitamin solution according to Dodsworth et al. [35], hereafter referred to as 2R2AW, at 55–60 °C and maintained as a glycerol suspension (20% v/v) at −80 °C (see Supplementary Note 1 for supplemental methods for physiological testing and DNA extraction procedures).

Genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation

Short-read sequence data for strain YIM 72310T was generated at Novogene (Novogene, Beijing, China, http://www.novogene.cn/) using a HiSeq 2000 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and resulting paired-end reads were assembled using SOAP_denovo_ [78]. Long-read sequence data for strain YIM 72310T was generated with Oxford Nanopore Technology (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) and assembled with Flye v. 2.8.2 [79]. The assembly generated with short-read sequence data was aligned to the long-read assembly for error correction using the “map to reference” function with default settings in Geneious v. 7.0.6 (https://www.geneious.com). The genome sequence of strain G233T was generated at the Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) sequencing technology [80]. All raw reads for strain G233T were assembled using HGAP version 2.3.0 [81]. The DNA G + C content for both strains was calculated from the genome sequences. Protein-coding sequences of both strains were annotated using multiple annotation pipelines (see Supplementary Note 1 for full methods).

Phylogenomics and genome comparisons

To obtain a robust phylogenomic framework for the phylum Chloroflexota, all publicly available genomes for the phylum incorporated in the GTDB [11] release 202, were identified. Of these, the highest quality genome for species-level groups with high-quality genomes available were selected as species representatives [>90% completeness and <5% contamination estimated with CheckM [82] in GTDB], and were used for phylogenomic inference (See Table S1 for detailed genome information). This was done by identifying and aligning the bac120 phylogenetic markers through the GTDB Toolkit v. 1.4.1 (GTDB-Tk [83]). Individual alignments of markers were subjected to model testing, concatenation, and partitioning, and a maximum-likelihood phylogeny was constructed as described in the Supplementary Note 2. This process was also repeated for the class Dehalococcoidia, after removal of markers from the dataset that were systematically absent from the genomes within the class. Pairwise Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and Average Amino Acid Identity (AAI) calculations, and other comparative genomics were performed as described in the Supplementary Note 2.

Geographic and environmental distribution

The geographic distribution of Tepidiformaceae and Tepidiforma was defined by applying the GTDB [11] release 202 taxonomy to classify 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) from the Earth Microbiome Project (EMP) [31] release 1. For EMP data, sample processing, sequencing, and core amplicon data analysis were performed by the Earth Microbiome Project (www.earthmicrobiome.org), and all amplicon sequence data and metadata have been made public through the EMP data portal (qiita.microbio.me/emp). Chloroflexota genome assembly accession numbers were obtained from the GTDB and 16S rRNA gene sequences were extracted from assemblies. Sequences longer than 500 nt were retained. GTDB Chloroflexota 16S rRNA gene sequences were searched against SILVA [84]. Chloroflexota 16S rRNA gene sequences in the 138 SSU NR 99 database, and a _Chloroflexota-_specific, genome-calibrated QIIME2 [85] classifier was constructed as described in Supplementary Note 3. EMP biom files were used to obtain ASVs and resulting ASVs were classified with the Chloroflexota classifier (see Supplementary Note 3 for specific method). The proportion of Tepidiformaceae and Tepidiforma present in each EMP sample was displayed using the R packages ggplot v. 2 3.3.3 and cowplot v. 1.1.1.

Light and electron microscopy

Cell morphology was investigated using cells grown on R2A at 60 °C that were harvested prior to reaching maximum turbidity. Phase-contrast micrographs of the two strains were recorded with a Zeiss Axioplan 2 imaging microscope. To obtain high-resolution images of strains YIM 72310T and G233T, cells were imaged with cryo-electron microscopy (2D, cryo-EM) and cryo-electron tomography (3D, cryo-ET). Briefly, 1 ml of cell culture was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 2 min to pellet insoluble components in the media. The remaining solution was then run through a 70 μm nylon filter (Fisher Scientific) and then centrifuged at 3000 × g for 5 min. The resulting cell pellet was resuspended in 20 μl of cell media. Cryo-EM grids were prepared using an automated Leica EM GP plunge freezer with the sample chamber set at 21 °C and 95% humidity. 3 μl of the cell solution was pipetted onto freshly glow-discharged copper R2/2 200 grids (Quantifoil), pre-blotted for 60 s, blotted for 2 s, plunged into liquid ethane, and stored in liquid nitrogen. The grids were imaged on a 120 kV Talos L120C transmission-electron microscope at the Netherlands Center for Electron Nanoscopy (NeCEN). For cryo-ET, bacterial cultures were mixed with 20 nm colloidal gold and plunge frozen with a Vitrobot Mark IV (ThermoFisher Scientific) onto R2/2 EM grids. Tilt series were collected using SerialEM [86] on a Titan Krios 300 kV transmission electron microscope (ThermoFisher Scientific) equipped with a Falcon 34 direct electron detector. Data collection conditions were −6 µm defocus, 120 e−/Å total dose, +/− 60° oscillations, with 1° tilt increments. 3D reconstructions were calculated using IMOD with the back-weighted projection method.

To purify the sacculi, a 500 ml culture of Tepidiforma flava YIM 72310T grown for 8 days was cooled on ice and pelleted at 5000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. Cells were resuspended in 12 ml of ice-cold 100 mM NaCl and added dropwise to 10 ml 4% SDS. An additional 10 ml of 8% SDS was added to bring the final concentration to 4%. The mixture was stirred in a water bath at 80 °C for 60 min. The suspension was split evenly into two centrifuge tubes and spun at 43,000 × g for 30 min at 20 °C then resuspended in 40 ml ultrapure water. This wash was repeated another 5 times, then combined and resuspended in 9 ml 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8). Subsequently, MgSO4 (10 mM) and DNase I (10 µg/ml) were added and tubes were incubated at 30 °C for 30 min without shaking, followed by addition of RNase A (20 µg/ml), and incubation for an additional 30 min with shaking at 225 rpm. Trypsin (1 mg/ml) was added, and the suspension was further incubated with shaking at 30 °C overnight. The digestion was washed with ultrapure water and pelleted at 43,000 × g at room temperature for 30 min. The pellet was resuspended in 10 ml 4% SDS and stirred at 95 °C for 30 min. The mixture was topped off with ultrapure water and centrifuged at 43,000 × g at room temperature for 30 min, then resuspended in ultrapure water and EDTA (8 mM) was added. The mixture was washed an additional four times and resuspended in 1 ml ultrapure water. The sacculi prep was stored at −80 °C prior to imaging. 4 µl of the sacculi preparation was loaded and plotted off 3 × onto Formvar caron 200 mesh copper grids, incubated for 1 min and washed 3 times with dH2O. Samples were stained with 0.5% uranyl acetate for 30 s and washed 3 times with dH2O. Negative stain TEM images were collected at ×6700 magnification on a 120 kV Talos L 120 C microscope equipped with a Ceta camera.

Exometabolomics

Quantitative exometabolomics was performed using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as described previously [62]. Strains YIM 72310T and G233T were cultivated in 20 ml volumes of R2A in 165 ml serum bottles with an air headspace until the late-exponential phase of growth (4 days). Sterile controls of the growth medium were stored at 4 °C in the dark or were incubated along with the culture tubes to account for thermal degradation of medium components. To extract metabolites, 10 ml of the media samples were frozen and lyophilized (FreeZone 2.5 Plus, Labconco), followed by addition of 200 µl MeOH-containing 10 µM internal standard (5–50 µM of 13C,15N cell-free amino acid mixture, Sigma #767964) to each sample, brief vortexing, and water bath sonication for 10 min. After centrifuging at 3000 rcf for 5 min, samples were sonicated for an additional 5 min followed by centrifugation for a further 5 min. The supernatant was removed and centrifuge-filtered through a 0.22 µm PVDF membrane (Millipore, Ultrafree-CL GV, #UFC40GV0S) for 2.5 min at 2500 rcf, transferred to amber glass LC-MS vials, and diluted 1:9 with MeOH in preparation for LC-MS analysis.

Filtered extracts were analyzed by LC-MS/MS on an Agilent 1290 LC stack, with MS and MS/MS data collected using a Q Exactive Orbitrap MS (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) with ESI source. Full MS spectra was collected from m/z 70-1050 at 70 000 FWHM resolution, with MS/MS fragmentation data acquired using 10, 20, and 30 V collision energies at 17,500 FWHM resolution. MS instrument parameters included sheath gas flow rate of 50 (au), auxiliary gas flow rate of 20 (au), sweep gas flow rate of 2 (au), 3 kV spray voltage and 400 °C capillary temperature. Normal phase chromatography was performed using a HILIC column (Millipore SeQuant ZIC-HILIC, 150 × 2.1 mm, 5 µm, # 50454) at 40 °C and using a 2 µl injection volume for each sample. The column was equilibrated with 100% buffer B (95:5 ACN:H2O w/ 5 mM ammonium acetate) for 1.5 min at 0.45 ml/min, diluting buffer B down to 65% with buffer A (100% H2O w/ 5 mM ammonium acetate) for 13.5 min, down to 0% B over 3 min while increasing flow to 0.6 ml/min and followed by isocratic elution in 100% buffer A for 5 min. Samples consisted of eight biological replicates each and three extraction controls, with sample injection order randomized and an injection blank of 100% MeOH run between each sample.

Metabolites were identified based on exact mass and retention time (RT) coupled with comparing MS/MS fragmentation spectra to that of purchased standards run using the same LC-MS methods and instrumentation (details of LC-MS/MS gradient, conditions and metabolite identifications are provided in Tables S14S17). LC-MS data were analyzed using a custom Python code [87]. A set of criteria were used to evaluate each of the detected peaks and assign a level of confidence, indicated by a score from 0 to 3, in the compound identification. Compounds given a positive identification had matching retention time and m/z to a compound standard run using the same methods and in many cases had matching MS/MS fragmentation spectrum to either an outside database (METLIN) or collected on a Q Exactive Orbitrap MS. Metabolites given a positive identification had detected m/z ≤ 5 ppm or 0.001 Da from theoretical as well as RT ≤ 0.5 min compared to a standard run using the same LC-MS method, with the highest level of positive identification (score of 3) also having matching MS/MS fragmentation spectra. An identification was invalidated when collected MS/MS fragmentation spectra did not match the standard. Metabolites with at least one mean peak height intensity (au) > 105 were analyzed statistically using a Shapiro–Wilk test (p > 0.05) of normality followed by a Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05), both performed using R version 3.4.3.

13C stable isotope experiments

10 ml of 2R2AW broth in 25 ml Balch tubes with an air headspace and closed with gas-impermeable aluminum seals with silicone septa were supplemented in triplicate with 13C-labeled (specific carbon atom labeled, or all carbon atoms labeled (U)) algal amino acids (U), xylose (U), galactose (U), ribose (U), pyruvate (1-13C and 2,3-13C), acetate (1-13C), lignin (U), hemicellulose (U), cellulose (U), vanillate (U), catechol (U), and 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate (U) at 0.1% w/v, and catechol (0.025% w/v) (99 atom fraction %; Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Andover, MA, United States), and lignin (0.05% w/v) (97 atom fraction %; IsoLife bv, Wageningen, Netherlands). Media were inoculated with exponential-phase YIM 72310T cultures at 2% v/v and incubated at 58.5 °C for 8 days. To measure 13CO2 production from 13C-labeled substrates, headspace samples were analyzed with cavity ring-down spectroscopy using a Picarro G2201 -i Isotopic Analyzer (Picarro Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) (see Supplementary Note 7 for full methods description). To measure assimilation of 13C-labeled substrates into microbial biomass, 13C isotope incorporation was measured in individual cells using the CAMECA NanoSIMS 50 at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and the data were used to estimate substrate incorporation (see Supplementary Note 7 for full methods description). Killed controls of 13C-labeled lignin and -catechol were also included by growing YIM 72310T in 2R2AW containing no labeled substrate for 8 days, followed by paraformaldehyde fixation. The killed cells were incubated an additional day with labeled lignin and catechol, then centrifuged and resuspended as before, and analyzed as described in Supplementary Note 7.

Data availability

Genome sequence data for the two novel isolates have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and are available under the GenBank assembly accession numbers GCA_027594505.1 (Tepidiforma flava YIM 72310T) and GCA_002563855.1 (Tepidiforma thermophila G233T). For exometabolomics, all raw data is available under the MassIVE dataset MSV000090480 accessible through GNPS at https://massive.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/dataset.jsp?task=895e11f85bac44f2828880c77ff4ef8f, and metabolite identification data are available under the FigShare collection “Exometabolomics analysis for MassIVE dataset MSV000090480” at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6236283.v1. All other data are included as supplemental material to this paper.

References

  1. Wasmund K, Schreiber L, Lloyd KG, Petersen DG, Schramm A, Stepanauskas R, et al. Genome sequencing of a single cell of the widely distributed marine subsurface Dehalococcoidia, phylum Chloroflexi. ISME J. 2014;8:383–97.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Coleman GA, Davín AA, Mahendrarajah TA, Szánthó LL, Spang A, Hugenholtz P, et al. A rooted phylogeny resolves early bacterial evolution. Science 2021;372:eabe0511.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Battistuzzi FU, Hedges SB. A major clade of prokaryotes with ancient adaptations to life on land. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;26:335–43.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Garrity GM, Holt JG. Thermomicrobia class nov. In: Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund BP, Kämpfer P, Rainey FA, et al. (editors). Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118960608.cbm00050.
  5. Cole JK, Gieler BA, Heisler DL, Palisoc MM, Williams AJ, Dohnalkova AC, et al. Kallotenue papyrolyticum gen. nov., sp. nov., a cellulolytic and filamentous thermophile that represents a novel lineage (Kallotenuales ord. nov., Kallotenuaceae fam. nov.) within the class Chloroflexia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:4675–82.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Moe WM, Yan J, Nobre MF, da Costa MS, Rainey FA. Dehalogenimonas lykanthroporepellens gen. nov., sp. nov., a reductively dehalogenating bacterium isolated from chlorinated solvent-contaminated groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:2692–7.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Sorokin DY, Vejmelkova D, Lücker S, Streshinskaya GM, Rijpstra WIC, Damste JSS, et al. Nitrolancea hollandica gen. nov., sp. nov., a chemolithoautotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a bioreactor belonging to the phylum Chloroflexi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:1859–65.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Mehrshad M, Rodriguez-Valera F, Amoozegar MA, López-García P, Ghai R. The enigmatic SAR202 cluster up close: shedding light on a globally distributed dark ocean lineage involved in sulfur cycling. ISME J. 2018;12:655–68.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Gaisin VA, Ivanov TM, Kuznetsov BB, Gorlenko VM, Grouzdev DS. Draft genome sequence of Chloroflexus sp. strain isl-2, a thermophilic filamentous anoxygenic phototrophic bacterium isolated from the Strokkur geyser, Iceland. Genome Announc. 2016;4:e00714–16.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  10. Lee PKH, He J, Zinder SH, Alvarez-Cohen L. Evidence for nitrogen fixation by “_Dehalococcoides ethenogenes_” strain 195. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7551–5.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  11. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;50:D785–D94.
    Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
  12. Morris RM, Rappé MS, Urbach E, Connon SA, Giovannoni SJ. Prevalence of the _Chloroflexi_-related SAR202 bacterioplankton cluster throughout the mesopelagic zone and deep ocean. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:2836–42.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  13. Wasmund K, Algora C, Müller J, Krüger M, Lloyd KG, Reinhardt R, et al. Development and application of primers for the class Dehalococcoidia (phylum Chloroflexi) enables deep insights into diversity and stratification of subgroups in the marine subsurface. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17:3540–56.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Wang Y, Sheng H-F, He Y, Wu J-Y, Jiang Y-X, Tam NF-Y, et al. Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of Illumina tags. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:8264–71.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  15. Landry Z, Swan Brandon K, Herndl Gerhard J, Stepanauskas R, Giovannoni SJ. SAR202 genomes from the dark ocean predict pathways for the oxidation of recalcitrant dissolved organic matter. mBio 2017;8:e00413–17.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  16. Zhang J, Yang Y, Zhao L, Li Y, Xie S, Liu Y. Distribution of sediment bacterial and archaeal communities in plateau freshwater lakes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:3291–302.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Mehrshad M, Salcher MM, Okazaki Y, Nakano S-I, Šimek K, Andrei A-S, et al. Hidden in plain sight—highly abundant and diverse planktonic freshwater Chloroflexi. Microbiome 2018;6:176.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  18. Ley RE, Harris JK, Wilcox J, Spear JR, Miller SR, Bebout BM, et al. Unexpected diversity and complexity of the Guerrero Negro hypersaline microbial mat. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3685–95.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  19. Mogul R, Vaishampayan P, Bashir M, McKay CP, Schubert K, Bornaccorsi R, et al. Microbial community and biochemical dynamics of biological soil crusts across a gradient of surface coverage in the central Mojave desert. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:01974.
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Yamada T, Sekiguchi Y. Cultivation of uncultured Chloroflexi subphyla: significance and ecophysiology of formerly uncultured Chloroflexi “Subphylum I” with natural and biotechnological relevance. Microbes Environ. 2009;24:205–16.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Nayfach S, Roux S, Seshadri R, Udwary D, Varghese N, Schulz F, et al. A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:499–509.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Lloyd KG, Steen AD, Ladau J, Yin J, Crosby L, Neufeld, et al. Phylogenetically novel uncultured microbial cells dominate Earth microbiomes. mSystems 2018;3:e00055–18.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  23. Hentschel U, Hopke J, Horn M, Friedrich AB, Wagner M, Hacker J, et al. Molecular evidence for a uniform microbial community in sponges from different oceans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:4431–40.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  24. Hardoim CCP, Costa R. Temporal dynamics of prokaryotic communities in the marine sponge Sarcotragus spinosulus. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:3097–112.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Kochetkova TV, Toshchakov SV, Zayulina KS, Elcheninov AG, Zavarzina DG, Lavrushin VY, et al. Hot in Cold: Microbial life in the hottest springs in permafrost. Microorganisms 2020;8:1308.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  26. Dodsworth JA, Hungate BA, Hedlund BP. Ammonia oxidation, denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium in two US Great Basin hot springs with abundant ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:2371–86.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Kochetkova TV, Zayulina KS, Zhigarkov VS, Minaev NV, Chichkov BN, Novikov AA, et al. Tepidiforma bonchosmolovskayae gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic Chloroflexi bacterium from a Chukotka hot spring (Arctic, Russia), representing a novel class, Tepidiformia, which includes the previously uncultivated lineage OLB14. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:1192–202.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  29. Kaster A-K, Mayer-Blackwell K, Pasarelli B, Spormann AM. Single cell genomic study of Dehalococcoidetes species from deep-sea sediments of the Peruvian Margin. ISME J. 2014;8:1831–42.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  30. Vuillemin A, Kerrigan Z, D’Hondt S, Orsi WD. Exploring the abundance, metabolic potential and gene expression of subseafloor Chloroflexi in million-year-old oxic and anoxic abyssal clay. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96:fiaa223.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  31. Thompson LR, Sanders JG, McDonald D, Amir A, Ladau J, Locey KJ, et al. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 2017;551:457–63.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  32. Yang Y, Zhang Y, Cápiro NL, Yan J. Genomic characteristics distinguish geographically distributed Dehalococcoidia. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:546063.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  33. Colatriano D, Tran PQ, Guéguen C, Williams WJ, Lovejoy C, Walsh DA. Genomic evidence for the degradation of terrestrial organic matter by pelagic Arctic Ocean Chloroflexi bacteria. Commun Biol. 2018;1:90.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  34. Yamada T, Sekiguchi Y, Hanada S, Imachi H, Ohashi A, Harada H, et al. Anaerolinea thermolimosa sp. nov., Levilinea saccharolytica gen. nov., sp. nov. and Leptolinea tardivitalis gen. nov., sp. nov., novel filamentous anaerobes, and description of the new classes Anaerolineae classis nov. and Caldilineae classis nov. in the bacterial phylum Chloroflexi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:1331–40.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Dodsworth JA, Gevorkian J, Despujos F, Cole JK, Murugapiran SK, Ming H, et al. Thermoflexus hugenholtzii gen. nov., sp. nov., a thermophilic, microaerophilic, filamentous bacterium representing a novel class in the Chloroflexi, Thermoflexia classis nov., and description of Thermoflexaceae fam. nov. and Thermoflexales ord. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:2119–27.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Hug LA, Castelle CJ, Wrighton KC, Thomas BC, Sharon I, Frischkorn KR, et al. Community genomic analyses constrain the distribution of metabolic traits across the Chloroflexi phylum and indicate roles in sediment carbon cycling. Microbiome 2013;1:22.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  37. Morohoshi S, Matsuura K, Haruta S. Secreted protease mediates interspecies interaction and promotes cell aggregation of the photosynthetic bacterium Chloroflexus aggregans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2015;362:fnu046.
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Fukushima S-i, Morohoshi S, Hanada S, Matsuura K, Haruta S. Gliding motility driven by individual cell-surface movements in a multicellular filamentous bacterium Chloroflexus aggregans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363:fnw056.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Gaisin VA, Kooger R, Grouzdev DS, Gorlenko VM, Pilhofer M. Cryo-electron tomography reveals the complex ultrastructural organization of multicellular filamentous Chloroflexota (Chloroflexi) bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:01373.
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Sutcliffe IC. Cell envelope architecture in the Chloroflexi: a shifting frontline in a phylogenetic turf war. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:279–82.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Ward LM, Hemp J, Pace LA, Fischer WW. Draft genome sequence of Leptolinea tardivitalis YMTK-2, a mesophilic anaerobe from the Chloroflexi class Anaerolineae. Genome Announc. 2015;3:e01356–15.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  42. Denef VJ, Mueller RS, Chiang E, Liebig JR, Vanderploeg HA. Chloroflexi CL500-11 populations that predominate deep-lake hypolimnion bacterioplankton rely on nitrogen-rich dissolved organic matter metabolism and C1 compound oxidation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:1423–32.
    Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
  43. Vollmer W, Blanot D, De Pedro MA. Peptidoglycan structure and architecture. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:149–67.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Löffler FE, Yan J, Ritalahti KM, Adrian L, Edwards EA, Konstantinidis KT, et al. Dehalococcoides mccartyi gen. nov., sp. nov., obligately organohalide-respiring anaerobic bacteria relevant to halogen cycling and bioremediation, belong to a novel bacterial class, Dehalococcoidia classis nov., order Dehalococcoidales ord. nov. and family Dehalococcoidaceae fam. nov., within the phylum Chloroflexi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:625–35.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Sexton DL, Chen G, Kara Murdoch F, Hashimi A, Löffler FE, Tocheva EI. Ultrastructure of organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia revealed by cryo-electron tomography. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022;88:e01906–21.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  46. Bowman KS, Nobre MF, da Costa MS, Rainey FA, Moe WM. Dehalogenimonas alkenigignens sp. nov., a chlorinated-alkane-dehalogenating bacterium isolated from groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:1492–8.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Key TA, Bowman KS, Lee I, Chun J, Albuquerque L, da Costa MS, et al. Dehalogenimonas formicexedens sp. nov., a chlorinated alkane-respiring bacterium isolated from contaminated groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1366–73.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Molenda O, Jácome LAP, Cao X, Nesbø CL, Tang S, Morson N, et al. Insights into origins and function of the unexplored majority of the reductive dehalogenase gene family as a result of genome assembly and ortholog group classification. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2020;22:663–78.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Robles A, Yellowman TL, Joshi S, Mohana Rangan S, Delgado AG. Microbial chain elongation and subsequent fermentation of elongated carboxylates as H2-producing processes for sustained reductive dechlorination of chlorinated ethenes. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55:10398–410.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Wang L, Yan J, Wise MJ, Liu Q, Asenso J, Huang Y, et al. Distribution patterns of polyphosphate metabolism pathway and its relationships with bacterial durability and virulence. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:00782.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  51. Racki LR, Tocheva EI, Dieterle MG, Sullivan MC, Jensen GJ, Newman DK. Polyphosphate granule biogenesis is temporally and functionally tied to cell cycle exit during starvation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E2440–E9.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  52. Fraley CD, Rashid MH, Lee SSK, Gottschalk R, Harrison J, Wood PJ, et al. A polyphosphate kinase 1 (ppk1) mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibits multiple ultrastructural and functional defects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:3526–31.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  53. Doemel W, Brock TD. Structure, growth, and decomposition of laminated algal-bacterial mats in alkaline hot springs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977;34:433–52.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  54. Jensen SI, Steunou A-S, Bhaya D, Kühl M, Grossman AR. In situ dynamics of O2, pH and cyanobacterial transcripts associated with CCM, photosynthesis and detoxification of ROS. ISME J. 2011;5:317–28.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Kim Y-M, Nowack S, Olsen MT, Becraft ED, Wood JM, Thiel V, et al. Diel metabolomics analysis of a hot spring chlorophototrophic microbial mat leads to new hypotheses of community member metabolisms. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:00209.
    Article Google Scholar
  56. Maymó-Gatell X, Chien Y-T, Gossett JM, Zinder SH. Isolation of a bacterium that reductively dechlorinates tetrachloroethene to ethene. Science. 1997;276:1568–71.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Wasmund K, Cooper M, Schreiber L, Lloyd KG, Baker BJ, Petersen DG, et al. Single-cell genome and group-specific dsrAB sequencing implicate marine members of the class Dehalococcoidia (phylum Chloroflexi) in sulfur cycling. mBio 2016;7:e01356–15.
    Article Google Scholar
  58. Rinke C, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A, Ivanova NN, Anderson IJ, Cheng J-F, et al. Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 2013;499:431–7.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Yang Y, Sanford R, Yan J, Chen G, Cápiro NL, Li X, et al. Roles of organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia in carbon cycling. mSystems 2020;5:e00757–19.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  60. De Long EF, Preston CM, Mincer T, Rich V, Hallam SJ, Frigaard N-U, et al. Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean’s interior. Science 2006;311:496–503.
    Article Google Scholar
  61. Varela MM, Van Aken HM, Herndl GJ. Abundance and activity of _Chloroflexi_-type SAR202 bacterioplankton in the meso- and bathypelagic waters of the (sub)tropical Atlantic. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:1903–11.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Thomas SC, Payne D, Tamadonfar KO, Seymour CO, Jiao J-Y, Murugapiran SK, et al. Genomics, exometabolomics, and metabolic probing reveal conserved proteolytic metabolism of Thermoflexus hugenholtzii and three candidate species from China and Japan. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:632731.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  63. van der Meer MTJ, Schouten S, Bateson MM, Nübel U, Wieland A, Kühl M, et al. Diel variations in carbon metabolism by green nonsulfur-like bacteria in alkaline siliceous hot spring microbial mats from Yellowstone National Park. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:3978–86.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  64. Revsbech NP, Trampe E, Lichtenberg M, Ward DM, Kühl M, Spormann AM. In situ hydrogen dynamics in a hot spring microbial mat during a diel cycle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:4209–17.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  65. Gonzalez C, Gutierrez C, Ramirez C. _Halobacterium vallismorti_s sp. nov. An amylolytic and carbohydrate-metabolizing, extremely halophilic bacterium. Can J Microbiol. 1978;24:710–5.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Janusz G, Pawlik A, Sulej J, widerska-Burek U, Jarosz-Wilkołazka A, Paszczyński A. Lignin degradation: microorganisms, enzymes involved, genomes analysis and evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017;41:941–62.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  67. Kirk TK, Farrell RL. Enzymatic “combustion”: the microbial degradation of lignin. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1987;41:465–501.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Kawaichi S, Ito N, Kamikawa R, Sugawara T, Yoshida T, Sako Y. Ardenticatena maritima gen. nov., sp. nov., a ferric iron-and nitrate-reducing bacterium of the phylum ‘_Chloroflexi_’ isolated from an iron-rich coastal hydrothermal field, and description of Ardenticatenia classis nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:2992–3002.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Mitchell JG. The influence of cell size on marine bacterial motility and energetics. Micro Ecol. 1991;22:227–38.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  70. Stocker R. Marine microbes see a sea of gradients. Science 2012;338:628–33.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Noell SE, Brennan E, Washburn Q, Davis Ii EW, Hellweger FL, Giovannoni SJ. Differences in the regulatory strategies of marine oligotrophs and copiotrophs reflect differences in motility. Environ Microbiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16357.
  72. Kumar S, Suleski M, Craig JM, Kasprowicz AE, Sanderford M, Li M, et al. TimeTree 5: An Expanded Resource for Species Divergence Times. Mol Biol Evol. 2022;39:msac174.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  73. Ren M, Feng X, Huang Y, Wang H, Hu Z, Clingenpeel S, et al. Phylogenomics suggests oxygen availability as a driving force in Thaumarchaeota evolution. ISME J. 2019;13:2150–61.
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  74. Yang Y, Zhang C, Lenton TM, Yan X, Zhu M, Zhou M, et al. The evolution pathway of ammonia-oxidizing archaea shaped by major geological events. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:3637–48.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  75. Martinez-Gutierrez CA, Uyeda JC, Aylward FO. A timeline of bacterial and archaeal diversification in the ocean. bioRxiv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.27.514092.
  76. Cole JK, Peacock JP, Dodsworth JA, Williams AJ, Thompson DB, Dong H, et al. Sediment microbial communities in Great Boiling Spring are controlled by temperature and distinct from water communities. ISME J. 2013;7:718–29.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Hedlund BP, Cole JK, Williams AJ, Hou W, Zhou E, Li W, et al. A review of the microbiology of the Rehai geothermal field in Tengchong, Yunnan Province, China. Geosci Front. 2012;3:273–88.
    Article Google Scholar
  78. Li Y, Hu Y, Bolund L, Wang J. State of the art de novo assembly of human genomes from massively parallel sequencing data. Hum Genom. 2010;4:271.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  79. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:540–6.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Eid J, Fehr A, Gray J, Luong K, Lyle J, Otto G, et al. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 2009;323:133–8.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2013;10:563–9.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  82. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  83. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 2020;36:1925–7.
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  84. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:7188–96.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  85. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  86. Mastronarde DN. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J Struct Biol. 2005;152:36–51.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  87. Yao Y, Sun T, Wang T, Ruebel O, Northen T, Bowen BP. Analysis of metabolomics datasets with high-performance computing and metabolite atlases. Metabolites 2015;5:431–42.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jeremy A. Dodsworth and Senthil K. Murugapiran for assistance with sampling and Jeremy A. Dodsworth for critical review of the paper; Arinola L. Adegboruwa and Chrisabelle R. Mefferd for assistance with cultivation experiments; and Leanna Little Dog, for help in performing quantitative PCR for detecting Tepidiforma in Great Boiling Spring. The work (proposal: https://doi.org/10.46936/10.25585/60000691, and https://doi.org/10.46936/10.25585/60007554) conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (https://ror.org/04xm1d337), a DOE Office of Science User Facility, is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Work carried out at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) was done under Contract DE-AC52-07NA2734. Funding for this project was provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation (DEB 1557042), NASA (80NNSC17KO548), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 92251302, 91951205, and 31970122). Part of this project was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant to EIT (RGPIN 04345) and Post Graduate Scholarship (552674) to AH. For EMP data included in geographical distribution analysis, sample processing, sequencing, and core amplicon data analysis were performed by the Earth Microbiome Project (www.earthmicrobiome.org), and all amplicon sequence data and metadata have been made public through the EMP data portal (qiita.microbio.me/emp).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA
    Marike Palmer, Jonathan K. Covington, En-Min Zhou, Scott C. Thomas, Cale O. Seymour, Dengxun Lai & Brian P. Hedlund
  2. State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Resources and Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-Sen University, 510275, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
    En-Min Zhou, Jian-Yu Jiao, Lan Liu, Wen-Dong Xian, Meng-Meng Li & Wen-Jun Li
  3. Key Laboratory of Microbial Diversity in Southwest China of Ministry of Education, Yunnan Institute of Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, 650091, Kunming, People’s Republic of China
    En-Min Zhou, Neeli Habib & Xiao-Yang Zhi
  4. Department of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, 10010, USA
    Scott C. Thomas
  5. Department of Microbiology, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan
    Neeli Habib
  6. Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA
    Juliet Johnston, Jennifer Pett-Ridge, Peter K. Weber & Xavier Mayali
  7. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Life Sciences Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Ameena Hashimi & Elitza I. Tocheva
  8. Institute of Biology, Centre for Microbial Cell Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
    Alise R. Muok & Ariane Briegel
  9. The Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
    Leslie P. Silva, Benjamin P. Bowen, Katherine Louie, Tanja Woyke & Trent R. Northen
  10. Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
    Leslie P. Silva, Benjamin P. Bowen, Katherine Louie, Tanja Woyke & Trent R. Northen
  11. Life and Environmental Sciences, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, 95343, USA
    Jennifer Pett-Ridge & Tanja Woyke
  12. Innovative Genomics Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
    Jennifer Pett-Ridge
  13. Nevada Institute of Personalized Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA
    Brian P. Hedlund

Authors

  1. Marike Palmer
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Jonathan K. Covington
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. En-Min Zhou
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Scott C. Thomas
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Neeli Habib
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Cale O. Seymour
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Dengxun Lai
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Juliet Johnston
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Ameena Hashimi
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Jian-Yu Jiao
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Alise R. Muok
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. Lan Liu
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. Wen-Dong Xian
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. Xiao-Yang Zhi
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  15. Meng-Meng Li
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  16. Leslie P. Silva
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  17. Benjamin P. Bowen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  18. Katherine Louie
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  19. Ariane Briegel
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  20. Jennifer Pett-Ridge
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  21. Peter K. Weber
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  22. Elitza I. Tocheva
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  23. Tanja Woyke
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  24. Trent R. Northen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  25. Xavier Mayali
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  26. Wen-Jun Li
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  27. Brian P. Hedlund
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MP, JKC, and BPH conceived of the study. JKC, E-MZ, NH, LL, WDX, MML, W-JL, and BPH conceived and performed isolation and cultivation experiments. SCT, LPS, BPP, KL, TW, TRN, MP, and BPH were involved in conceiving, generating, visualizing, and interpreting exometabolomics experiments. MP, COS, DL, JYJ, XYZ, and JJ performed bioinformatics analyses. JJ, PKW, JP-R, and XM, performed nanoSIMS and/or Picarro analyses, visualization, and/or interpretation. ARM, AB, AH, and EIT performed TEM, cryo-electron tomography, visualized results, and interpreted data. MP and BPH wrote, reviewed, and edited the initial drafts of the paper, and all authors critically reviewed and contributed to the final version of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toMarike Palmer or Brian P. Hedlund.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palmer, M., Covington, J.K., Zhou, EM. et al. Thermophilic Dehalococcoidia with unusual traits shed light on an unexpected past.ISME J 17, 952–966 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01405-0

Download citation