The NANETS Consensus Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma & Medullary Thyroid Cancer (original) (raw)

• Journal List
• HHS Author Manuscripts
• PMC3419007

Pancreas. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 Aug 14.

Published in final edited form as:

PMCID: PMC3419007

NIHMSID: NIHMS395864

Herbert Chen

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin

Rebecca S. Sippel

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin

Karel Pacak

Reproductive Biology and Medicine Branch, Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Herbert Chen, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin;

Communications to: Herbert Chen, M.D., Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, H4/722 CSC, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-7375. Phone: (608)263-1387, FAX: (608)263-7652, ude.csiw.yregrus@nehc Or Karel Pacak, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc., Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology Branch, NICHD, Building 10, CRC, 1-East, Room 1-3140, 10 Center Drive, MSC-1109, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1109, vog.hin.liam@lerak, Fax: 1-301-402-0884; Phone: 1-301-402-4594

Abstract

Pheochromocytomas, intra-adrenal paraganglioma, and extra-adrenal sympathetic and parasympathetic paragangliomas are neuroendocrine tumors derived from adrenal chromaffin cells or similar cells in extra-adrenal sympathetic and parasympathetic paraganglia, respectively. Serious morbidity and mortality rates associated with these tumors are related to the potent effects of catecholamines on various organs, especially those of the cardiovascular system. Before any surgical procedure is done, pre-operative blockade is necessary to protect the patient against significant release of catecholamines due to anesthesia and surgical manipulation of the tumor. Treatment options vary with the extent of the disease with laparoscopic surgery being the preferred treatment for removal of primary tumors.

Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a malignancy of the thyroid C-cells or parafollicular cells. Thyroid c-cells elaborate a number of peptides and hormones, such as calcitonin, CEA, and chromogranin A. Some or all of these markers are elevated in patients with MTC and can be used to confirm the diagnosis as well as to follow patients longitudinally for recurrence. MTC consists of a spectrum of disease that ranges from extremely indolent tumors that are stable for many years to aggressive types associated with a high mortality rate. Genetic testing for RET mutations has allowed identification of familial cases and prophylactic thyroidectomy for cure. The only curative treatment is complete surgical resection.

PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA AND PARAGANGLIOMA

Introduction

In 2004 the World Health Organization defined a pheochromocytoma as an intra-adrenal paraganglioma, whereas closely related tumors of extra-adrenal sympathetic or parasympathetic paraganglia are classified as extra-adrenal paragangliomas. In general, about 80% of pheochromocytomas are located in the adrenal medulla1. Extra-adrenal sympathetic paragangliomas in the abdomen most commonly arise from chromaffin tissue around the inferior mesenteric artery (the organ of Zuckerkandl) and aortic bifurcation, less commonly from any other chromaffin tissue in the abdomen, pelvis, and thorax2. Extra-adrenal parasympathetic paragangliomas are most commonly found in the neck and head.

Pheochromocytomas and sympathetic extra-adrenal paragangliomas almost all produce, store, metabolize, and secrete catecholamines or their metabolites. Head and neck paragangliomas, however, rarely produce significant amounts of catecholamines (less than 5%).

Main signs and symptoms of catecholamine excess include hypertension, palpitations, headache, sweating and pallor. Less common signs and symptoms are fatigue, nausea, weight loss, constipation, flushing and fever. According to the degree of catecholamine excess, patients may present with myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, stroke or other vascular manifestations (e.g. any organ ischemia). Similar signs and symptoms are produced by numerous other clinical conditions and therefore pheochromocytoma is often referred to as the ‘great mimic’.

Epidemiology

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are rare and occur in about 0.05% to 0.1% of patients with sustained hypertension. However, this probably accounts for only 50% of people harboring pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma because about half the patients with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma have paroxysmal hypertension or normotension. The prevalence of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma can be estimated to lie between 1:6500 and 1:2500 with the annual incidence in the US of 500 to 1600 cases per year.

Pathology and molecular genetics

All pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas display similar basic histopathological characteristics although some differences between familial tumors have been described. According to the 2004 WHO criteria3, malignancy is defined by the presence of metastases, not local invasion (although a significant invasion is considered by some pathologists as the sign of malignancy). There is currently no consensus on the adoption of a formal scoring system for these tumors.

Improvements in genetics, diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytomas have changed the approaches to these tumors in recent years. The formerly used rule of 10% for pheochromocytoma (10% malignant, 10% bilateral, and 10% extra-adrenal) has been increasingly challenged4. At present it is estimated that at least 24–27% of pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas are associated with known genetic mutations, in children this prevalence may be as high as 40%5–10.

Pheochromocytomas may occur sporadically or as part of hereditary syndrome. According to the latest studies, among patients with non-syndromic pheochromocytoma, up to about 24% of tumors may be hereditary5, 10, 11. Hereditary pheochromocytoma is associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN-2A or MEN-2B), neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1), von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome, and familial paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas due to germ-line mutations of genes encoding succinate dehydrogenase subunits B, C, and D (SDHB, SDHC, SDHD) (Tables 1,​2). In general, the traits are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern11.

Table 1

Characteristics in various pheochromocytomas

Table 2

Presence of various tumors in hereditary syndromes associated with pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas

The panel at the First International Symposium on Pheochromocytoma recommended that it is neither appropriate nor currently cost-effective to test every disease-causing gene in every patient with a pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. To choose a proper genetic test the biochemical profile of catecholamine secretion, age of the patient, localization of the primary tumor and previous family history must be carefully evaluated and included in the genetic algorithm. Specifically, MEN-2- and NF-1-related pheochromocytoma always secrete epinephrine, VHL-related pheochromocytomas always secrete norepinephrine, and elevation of dopamine together with norepinephrine is seen in some SDHB-related paragangliomas. In contrast to MEN-2, VHL- and NF-1 tumors that are almost always found in the adrenal gland, SDHB-related tumors are found in extra-adrenal localizations. In those patients with malignant disease secondary to an extra-adrenal paraganglioma, almost 50% had SDHB mutations12. Some studies suggested that more than 2/3 of patients with SDHB-related pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma will develop metstatic disease13, 14. Family history is often helpful in MEN-2, VHL, and NF-1 tumors but only 10% of the currently investigated patients with SDHB mutations have a positive family history for pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma13 (Table 1).

Imaging and Biochemical Markers

Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma relies on biochemical evidence of catecholamine production by the tumor. Biochemical testing should be performed in symptomatic patients, patients with an adrenal incidentaloma and those who have a hereditary risk for developing a pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma.

Catecholamines are metabolized within chromaffin cells to metanephrines (norepinephrine to normetanephrine and epinephrine to metanephrine, respectively) and this intra-tumoral process occurs independently of catecholamine release. In line with these concepts, numerous independent studies have now confirmed that measurements of fractionated metanephrines (i.e. normetanephrine and metanephrine measured separately) in urine or plasma provide superior diagnostic sensitivity over measurement of the parent catecholamines (Table 3)15–17. However, to preserve high diagnostic sensitivity it is strongly recommended to obtain blood samples in the supine position18.

Table 3

Sensitivity and specificity of biochemical tests for the detection of pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma.

Therefore, current recommendations are that initial testing for pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma must include measurements of fractionated metanephrines in plasma, urine, or both, as available21. Blood sampling should be performed at a supine position after about 15–20 mins of i.v. catheter insertion. Food, caffeinated beverages, strenuous physical activity, or smoking are not permitted at least about 8–12 hours before the testing. The elevation of plasma metanephrines of more than 4-fold above the upper reference limit is associated with close to 100% probability of the tumor22. The actual level of the abnormal result should therefore be used to determine the need for immediate tumor localization studies versus additional biochemical investigations.

Should additional biochemical testing be necessary, the possibility of false-positive results due to medications, clinical conditions (as described above), or inadequate sampling conditions (e.g. blood sampling while seated) should first be considered and eliminated22. In patients with plasma metanephrine values above the upper reference limit and less than 4-fold above that limit, the clonidine suppression test combined with measurements of plasma catecholamines and normetanephrine may prove useful22.

Either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for initial tumor localization, with MRI preferred in children and pregnant or lactating women due to concerns regarding radiation exposure. Recent data suggest that adrenergic blockade in pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma patients as a specific precautionary measure prior to intravenous nonionic contrast enhanced CT imaging is not necessary (unpublished observations). CT and MRI have excellent sensitivity for detecting most catecholamine-producing tumors, these anatomical imaging approaches lack the specificity required to unequivocally identify a mass as a pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma23. The specificity of functional imaging using [123I]-labeled meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy ([123I]-MIBG) offers an approach that overcomes the specificity limitations of anatomical imaging. Reduced sensitivity of MIBG scans in familial paraganglioma syndromes, malignant disease and extra-adrenal paragangliomas has been described24–28. Newer compounds such [18F]-fluorodopamine ([18F]-FDA), [18F]-fluoro-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F]-FDOPA), and [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]-FDG) have emerged for use in positron emission tomography (PET). The superiority of [18F]-FDA PET imaging over [131I]-MIBG scintigraphy, especially in malignant tumors, has been reported29. [18F]-FDOPA PET imaging has been described to outperform [123I]-MIBG scintigraphy in the detection of pheochromocytoma30. However, the sensitivity of [18F]-FDOPA for metastatic paragangliomas is limited31. Studies have revealed that most pheochromocytomas show uptake of [18F]-FDG in PET imaging32, 33. Recently, [18F]-FDG was demonstrated to be a superior tool in the evaluation of metastatic SDHB-associated adult pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma34. It is recommended that functional imaging be used on all pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, except adrenal pheochromocytomas, that are less than 5 cm in size and associated with elevations of plasma or urine metanephrine (practically all epinephrine-producing pheochromocytomas are found in the adrenal gland or are recurrences of previously resected adrenal tumors).

Management of local-regional disease

Surgery is the primary treatment of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma and laparoscopic surgery is now the technique of first choice for resection adrenal and extra-adrenal tumors. Observational studies have clearly shown that the laparoscopic procedure decreases postoperative morbidity, hospital stay, and expense as compared to the conventional transabdominal technique for tumor removal. Due to the high incidence of bilateral adrenal disease in hereditary pheochromocytoma, partial adrenalectomies are advocated in these patients thereby avoiding morbidity associated with medical adrenal replacement. It remains controversial whether partial adrenalectomies should be considered in patients with a sporadic unilateral pheochromocytoma. However, open surgical approaches could still be necessary in selected patients with locally invasive or malignant disease35.

Although follow-up is especially important for patients identified with mutations of disease-causing genes, there is currently no method based on pathological examination of a resected tumor to rule out potential for malignancy or recurrence. Thus, long-term periodic follow-up remains recommended for all cases of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Genetic testing will increasingly be the key factor in estimating the life-long risk for development of recurrent disease, contralateral disease or malignant dedifferentiation and thus affect follow-up protocols.

Management of hormonal syndromes

Intra-operative risks must be kept to a minimum by appropriate pre-operative medical treatment to block the effects of catecholamines for at least 10–14 days before surgery36, 37. Adequate pre-operative α-blockade has been proven to reduce the number of peri-operative complications to less than 3%38. All patients with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma (even those with apparent normal levels of catecholamines) should receive appropriate preoperative medical management to block the effects of released catecholamines. Phenoxybenzamine (Dibenzyline), an α-adrenoceptor blocker, is most commonly used for preoperative control of blood pressure. The drug is initially administered orally at a dose of 10–20 mg twice daily. Alternatives to phenoxybenzamine for preoperative blockade of catecholamine-induced vasoconstriction include calcium channel blockers and selective competitive α1-adrenoceptor blocking agents, such as terazosin (Hytrin) and doxazosin (Cardura) that have shorter half-lives and lower the risk for postoperative hypotension. A β-adrenoceptor blocker may be used for preoperative control of tachyarrhythmias or angina. However, loss of β-adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilatation in a patient with unopposed catecholamine-induced vasoconstriction can result in dangerous increases in blood pressure. Therefore, β-adrenoceptor blockers should never be employed without first blocking α-adrenoceptor mediated vasoconstriction. Volume contraction associated with chronic vasoconstriction can be seen in patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Therefore, pre-operative volume expansion achieved by saline infusion or increased water intake is recommended to reduce post-operative hypotension39.

Management of advanced disease

Palliative surgery is usually performed in order to release tumor pressure on surrounding tissues or to decrease tumor mass. Decreased tumor burden can lead to a significant decrease in catecholamine secretion and organ damage as well as alpha and beta blockade dosage. Reduced tumor burden can also facilitate subsequent radiotherapy or chemotherapy. However, a survival advantage of surgical debulking is not proven. In some patients with organ metastatic lesions (not if numerous or very small), radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation are current attractive options.

[131I]-MIBG is used for patients in whom [123I]-MIBG scintigraphy is positive (only about 1/3 of patients will respond). Biochemical or symptom response rates as high as 67% and 89%, respectively, have been published40. Multicenter studies are required to reach consensus on the efficacy of high-dose versus fractionated usually medium doses of [131I]-MIBG and of monotherapy versus combination with other radionuclides or modes of chemotherapy. In patients with rapidly growing tumors, even if [123I]-MIBG scintigraphy shows positive lesions, chemotherapy is a preferable treatment option (only about 1/3 of patients will respond).

Chemotherapy, with a combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristin and dacarbazine (CVD), can provide tumor regression and symptom relief in up to 50% of patients, but the responses are usually short and in only 30% of patients41. Chemotherapy is preferred in patients with negative [123I]-MIBG scintigraphy and in those with rapidly progressing tumors.

The effect of [177-Lu-DOTA]-Octreotate in malignant paragangliomas or pheochromocytomas has only been described in case reports42. External-beam irradiation of bone metastases or radiofrequency and cryoablation may provide additional treatment alternatives in selected cases only. External radiation therapy may represent an appropriate approach to treat some bone lesions, especially those that are rapidly growing.

Conclusions and future looking statements

Future studies will have to investigate the different genotype-phenotype associations with consequent varying imaging performances and provide head-to-head comparisons of these methods in specific subsets of patients.

Clinical trials comparing high-dose [131I]-MIBG with smaller repeated doses or combinations with chemotherapeutic regimens are awaited. Treatment results, however, might vary considerably between patients with different underlying genetic mutations. This important observation of possible specific genotype-phenotype relationships is subject to further prospective and retrospective studies and will lead to more tailor-made treatment and follow-up approaches in the future.

MEDULLARY THYROID CANCER

Introduction

Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a malignancy of the thyroid C-cells or parafollicular cells. Thyroid c-cells elaborate a number of peptides and hormones, such as calcitonin, CEA, and chromogranin A. Some or all of these markers are elevated in patients with MTC and can be used to confirm the diagnosis as well as to follow patients longitudinally for recurrence. MTC consists of a spectrum of disease that ranges from extremely indolent tumors that are stable for many years to aggressive types associated with a high mortality rate.

Epidemiology

The majority of MTCs are sporadic and these patients most commonly present in the fifth or sixth decade with a palpable cervical lymph node or a solitary thyroid nodule43. However, up to 25% of MTC cases result from a germ-line activating mutation in the rearranged during transfection (RET) proto-oncogene44. Hereditary MTCs occur in the setting of the multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndrome type 2 (2A or 2B) or as familial MTC (FMTC) without associated endocrinopathies45.

MTC is present in virtually all of cases of MEN2A and is typically multifocal and bilateral46. The age of onset varies with the specific genetic mutation, but it usually presents in early adulthood. Pheochromocytomas can be seen in up to 50% of cases and they are frequently multifocal and associated with adrenal medullary hyperplasia. Pheochromocytomas can be detected by using either plasma or urine metanephrines levels. It is important to recognize and diagnose pheochromocytomas, because they should be resected prior to definitive surgery for MTC. Pre-operative alpha blockade should be utilized and laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the preferred operation for pheochromocytoma (as mentioned in the previous section). Hyperparathyroidism occurs in 20–35% of patients with MEN2A. Diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism is performed with serum calcium and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Parathyroidectomy is usually performed at the time of thyroidectomy. Although 4-gland hyperplasia necessitating a subtotal parathyroidectomy or total parathyroidectomy with forearm implantation often occurs, some patients with MEN2A will have single gland disease and intraoperative PTH testing can help guide the extent of surgery47. Some variants of MEN2A are also associated with either cutaneous lichen amyloidosis or Hirschsprung’s disease. Patient prognosis in MEN2A is predominantly based upon successful treatment of the MTC48.

In MEN2B, almost 100% of patients will develop MTC49. MTC occurs at a very young age and has a very aggressive course. Because of this, patients with MEN2B are rarely rendered disease free. Pheochromocytomas occur in 50% of patients. Other associated features of MEN2B include development of diffuse ganglioneuromas of the lips, tongues, eyelids, and gastrointestinal tract. These patients have a characteristic appearance including a marfanoid habitus, everted eyelids, and thick lips. These patients also have problems with megacolon, skeletal abnormalities, and markedly enlarged peripheral nerves. Due to the aggressive nature of the MTC in these patients, many die at a young age. Therefore, most of the MEN2B diagnoses are de-novo germline mutations.

In familial MTC (FMTC), patients develop isolated MTC without other endocrinopathies. There is significant overlap in the genetic mutations that lead to either FMTC or MEN2A. In order to consider a family to have FMTC and not MEN2A, there must be no evidence of either pheochromocytoma or hyperparathyroidism in more than ten carriers and multiple members need to be affected after the age of 50. Since MTC is often the first manifestation of MEN2A, with pheochromocytomas lagging significantly behind, distinguishing between MEN2A and FMTC can be difficult

Pathology and molecular genetics

Pathologically, MTC lesions are whitish-gray in color and firm to palpation. MTC appears microscopically as nests of uniform cells that have stromal amyloid. In sporadic MTC, the thyroid lesions are usually unifocal, but in hereditary disease tumors are frequently multifocal and bilateral. C-cell hyperplasia can be present in many patients with hereditary disease and is a precursor lesion. C-cell hyperplasia is defined as more than 6 C-cells per follicle or more than 50 C-cells per low power field.

Familial MTC is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern, with variable expressivity and penetrance. The genetic mutation is found in the RET (REarranged during Transfection) proto-oncogene, which in 1991 was mapped to chromosome 10q11.250. The RET gene encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor: a single point mutation is required for malignant transformation. In patients with hereditary disease, this point mutation is in the germline. In sporadic MTC cases, somatic mutations of RET have been discovered in 25–45% of cases. The most common germline mutation in MEN2A is in codon 634 (80% of patients). The most frequently associated germline mutation with MEN2B is in codon 918. Most patients with hereditary disease are now identified through genetic testing of at risk family members. Family members of patients with a germline mutation of the RET gene have a 50% chance of inheriting the mutation. In patients harboring a RET mutation, their lifetime risk of malignancy approaches 100%. Even in those with perceived sporadic MTC, there is a 6–10% chance of an occult germline RET mutation. Therefore, most recommend that all patients with a diagnosis of MTC should undergo RET mutation genetic analysis.

The aggressiveness of the MTC in hereditary disease is dependent upon the specific RET mutation48,51. Currently RET mutations are classified into 3 groups based aggressiveness of MTC or level of risk as shown in Table 452. Level 3 mutations (RET codons 883, 918, and 922) are the most aggressive. These patients can have metastasis in the first years of life46. Because of the high risk of malignant progression at very young age, thyroidectomy is recommended within the first 6 months and preferably within the first month of life. Level 2 mutations (RET codons 611, 618, 620, and 634 mutations) are considered high risk for aggressive MTC. Patients with level 2 RET mutations should undergo thyroidectomy before age 5. Level 1 mutations (RET codons 609, 768s, 790, 791, 804, and 891) are the lowest risk for aggressive MTC of all the RET mutations. In patients with level 1 RET mutations, MTC usually develops later in life and is more indolent. Since MTC is these patients is rarely reported prior to 10 years of age, many recommend waiting until that time to perform the thyroidectomy. However, since thyroidectomy can be cured if performed early and that there remains variability and unpredictability in some families, hence many suggest treating all patients with MEN2A the same and perform their prophylactic operation by age 5 whenever possible.

Table 4

RET Mutations associated with Hereditary MTC

Imaging and biochemical markers

The ability to genetically diagnose hereditary MTC with RET testing has virtually eliminated the need for biochemical and radiologic tests to determine which family members are at risk to develop MTC. Thus, genetic testing offers potential surgical intervention prior to the development of MTC. However, physicians still rely on biochemical and radiology tests to diagnoses sporadic MTC, and to follow patients with both hereditary and sporadic MTC for recurrent disease. C-cells elaborate a number of peptides and hormones. Calcitonin is the most common while other substances secreted by the C-cells include: carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), corticotrophin, somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and serotonin. Calcitonin has proven to be the most useful biochemical marker, because levels correlate with tumor burden53. An elevated or rising calcitonin level is often the first sign of recurrent or persistent disease. Calcitonin doubling-time has been shown to be accurate for determining prognosis54. Calcitonin levels may be slightly elevated in a small percent of normal patients, but most patients with an elevation >100 pg/ml (normal range <10 pg/ml) have a diagnosis of MTC. The degree of calcitonin elevation correlates well with tumor volume. Lymph node metastases are seen at calcitonin levels of 10–40 pg/ml. Distant metastases are seen with calcitonin levels of greater than 150 pg/ml and frequently > 1000 pg/ml. CEA is also used as a marker of disease, and may be preferentially expressed in less differentiated tumors. A preoperative serum CEA level>30 ng/ml is often suggests disease that has progressed outside of the thyroid. CEA levels>100 are highly associated with extensive lymph node involvement and distant metastasis. An increasing CEA level in the presence of a stable calcitonin is usually a sign of dedifferentiation of MTC and is associated with a worse prognosis. Chromogranin A is also elevated in patients with MTC and can be used to follow tumor progression.

Imaging studies are critical in the management of patients with sporadic MTC. Most patients with sporadic MTC will present with a thyroid mass. A neck ultrasound can be used to characterize the mass as well as to look for additional thyroid lesion as well as the presence of suspicious lymph nodes. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) can then be performed under ultrasound guidance of any thyroid mass or enlarged lymph nodes. MTC is characterized by the presence of small cells with minimal cytoplasm and abundance of stromal amyloid on cytology. To confirm the diagnosis of MTC, FNA slides can undergo immunostaining for calcitonin, chromogranin A, or CEA. Once the diagnosis of MTC is made, CT scans of the chest, mediastinum, and abdomen are usually performed as part of the metastatic workup. Distant metastases are present in 10–15% of patients at the time of diagnosis, with the most common locations being the mediastinum, liver, lungs, and bone. Metastatic lesions may be large and calcified and readily apparent on imaging, but can also display a military pattern of small micrometastases which are not seen on imaging. These small liver metastases are best visualized by laparoscopy55,56.

Management of local-regional disease

Prophylactic Surgery

Prophylactic surgery removes the at risk organ prior to it developing clinically significant disease. When determining the timing of prophylactic surgery, it is important to balance the risk of clinically significant disease with the risks of operative intervention. In hereditary MTC there is a clear age-related progression from C-cell hyperplasia to MTC and ultimately to nodal spread. However, the optimal timing of prophylactic thyroidectomy is not clear. Hopefully as we gain a better understanding of the phenotype-genotype relationships amongst the RET mutations, we will be better able to predict when disease is likely to develop and therefore plan operative intervention prior to that time.

The RET mutations associated with hereditary MTC are listed in Table 4 with guidelines as to when to perform a prophylactic thyroidectomy for each mutation52. In general it is reasonable to intervene in children with MEN2A and FMTC by age 5, while patients with MEN2B should be operated on during infancy whenever feasible. In a recent study looking at long-term follow-up of patients who have undergone prophylactic thyroidectomy, no patient with MEN2A who was operated on under the age of 7 has had evidence of recurrent disease, with over 5 years of follow-up57. If a family does not want to proceed with prophylactic surgery in a young child, then it is reasonable to follow the patient closely with stimulated plasma calcitonin levels, and then proceed with operation when there is a rise in the stimulated calcitonin levels.

The extent of surgery that is necessary in the prophylactic setting has been debated. Everyone agrees that at a minimum all patients should undergo a total thyroidectomy. The debate involves whether or not a central neck lymphadenectomy should be performed. Advocates of routine central neck dissection, argue that even in screened patients, clinically occult disease with nodal metastasis can be present in 6% of patients. They argue that the best opportunity to cure a patient is at their initial operation. With the use of routine autotransplantation of the parathyroid glands, the long-term complications of a central neck dissection can be minimized. Opponents of routine central neck dissection argue that while nodal disease has been seen in the occult setting, it is very rare in children under ten. They suggest that a more selective approach can be performed utilizing preoperative ultrasound and tumor markers to further risk stratify patients. With a normal preoperative ultrasound and serum calcitonin (basal and/or stimulated) and CEA level, the risk of occult nodal disease is very low and the potential benefits of a prophylactic neck dissection are outweighed by the risks of permanent hypoparathyroidism. In a recent series from Washington University where they have performed 85 prophylactic total thyroidectomies with bilateral central neck dissections (with routine parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation), they found 2 (2.4%) patients with nodal disease and 3 patients with permanent hypoparathyroidism (3.5%)57. While the incidence of nodal disease is low, those patients who have nodal disease at the time of their prophylactic dissection often end up having persistently elevated calcitonin levels and are not cured of their disease. In order to minimize the risks of this prophylactic operation, it is essential that these procedures be performed only by experienced surgeons.

Since the first prophylactic thyroidectomies were performed in the early 1990s, the risk of recurrence after a prophylactic thyroidectomy is still unknown. Preliminary results suggest that the risk of recurrence is very low, especially when surgery is performed prior to age 1057. However, since the long-term outcomes are not known, it is recommended that after a prophylactic thyroidectomy patients be followed every 1–2 years with plasma calcitonin and CEA levels. In addition, patients at risk for MEN2 need to be screened for the development of both pheochromocytoma (MEN2A and 2B) and hyperparathyroidism (MEN2A only), which can occur decades later.

Clinically Evident Disease

Patients who have clinically evident disease are best treated with a minimum of a total thyroidectomy and bilateral central neck dissection. Ipsilateral lateral neck dissection should be added if the primary tumor is greater than 1 cm in size or there is evidence of positive nodes in the central neck. A contralateral lateral neck dissection should be considered in patients with bilateral tumors or extensive lateral adenopathy on the side of the tumor.

Central neck nodal disease is present in up to 81% of patients with palpable tumors58. Addition of a central neck dissection improves cure rates over a thyroidectomy alone in patients with clinically evident MTC59. A central neck dissection consists of a complete clearing of all lymph nodes and fibrofatty tissue from the level VI compartment. Level VI extends from the hyoid bone superiorly to the innominate vessels inferiorly; laterally it is bound by the carotids. A level VI lymphadenectomy requires careful dissection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve along its entire length; it also requires meticulous dissection of the parathyroid glands. Many surgeons argue that it is impossible to do a complete central neck dissection without removing the parathyroids and/or their blood supply. Some surgeons routinely remove the parathyroid glands with the specimen and then carefully dissect them free from the nodal tissue and autotransplant them. If patients have sporadic MTC, familial MTC, or MEN2B then the autotransplant can be performed in the sternocleidomastoid. In patients with MEN2A, due to the risk of hyperparathyroidism in the remnant, the parathyroid tissue should be autotransplanted to the non-dominant forearm. Placement of the autograft in the forearm facilitates the work-up and management of any hyperparathyroidism that may develop. Autotransplanted parathyroid glands usually do not function for 4–8 weeks, so calcium and vitamin D replacement is required during this time.

The role of a lateral dissection in MTC is less clear. Ipsilateral nodal metastasis are present in 14–80% of patients60 and contralateral lateral nodal metastasis have been reported in 19%–49% of patients. Since there is a high incidence of lymph node disease, even in tumors <1 cm, some surgeons advocate a bilateral lateral neck dissection for all patients with MTC61. Unlike papillary thyroid cancer, where microscopic nodal disease may be effectively treated with radioactive iodine, the only effective treatment for MTC is surgical resection. While many patients with MTC have an indolent course, some patients suffer from a much more aggressive variant of disease and early surgical intervention gives them the best chance for a long-term cure. The significance of microscopic disease in the lymph nodes is not fully known, but a significant number of patients will have recurrent or persist disease based on the presence of an elevated calcitonin after primary operation. Despite an aggressive surgical resection of all neck lymph nodes, only 32% of patients with nodal disease at the time of there operation have undetectable calcitonin levels post-operatively.

The morbidity of a bilateral neck dissection can be significant, and because of this, many surgeons advocate a more selective approach to the lateral neck. Preoperative neck ultrasound is highly sensitive for detecting lateral lymphadenopathy. An ipsilateral lateral lymphadenectomy is advocated when ultrasound or physical exam suggests the presence of lateral lymphadenopathy, when central compartment lymph nodes are involved, or when the primary tumor is ≥1 cm. Contralateral lateral neck dissections are then added when patients have bilateral tumors or there is extensive lymphadenopathy on the primary tumor side. Contralateral lymph node involvement is almost never seen in the absence of ipsilateral lymph node disease, therefore in patients with a unifocal tumor and no ipsilateral lymph node disease, there is likely no benefit to a contralateral neck dissection. Lateral neck dissections can be performed at the time of the initial total thyroidectomy and central neck dissection, or can be done in a staged procedure after the initial operation. Interestingly, according to the SEER database, over half of patients treated for MTC over the last several decades had less than the recommendation operation, suggesting that many patients with persistent calcitonin elevations may have had an inadequate initial operation62. The staging of MTC is shown in Table 5.

Table 5

TNM Staging of Medullary Thyroid Cancer

Management of hormonal syndromes

Calcitonin levels, if marked elevated, can also cause symptoms including flushing, diarrhea, and weight loss. Patients with hormonal symptoms may benefit from medical treatment with somatostatin analogs. These patients may also benefit from cytoreductive surgery of unresectable disease. Surgery has been demonstrated to effectively palliate patients with incurable MTC63.

Management of advanced disease

Systemic chemotherapy

Conventional chemotherapy has shown limited efficacy in patients with MTC. Complete responses are very rare and partial responses have been seen in less than a third of patients. The side effect profile of traditional chemotherapy is often substantial, making this an unappealing option for many patients. Recently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting RET, EGFR, and VEGF have been utilized in clinical trials for patients with metastatic MTC. Limited efficacy was seen with imitanib mesylate (Gleevac)64. The RET inhibitor Vandetanib (Zactima), a RET inhibitor, has shown some initial encouraging results in patients with hereditary MTC including a few partial responses and many stable responsse by CT imaging, with a dramatic decrease in tumor markers (Wells SA, Jr., Gosnell, J.E., Gagel, R.F., Moley, J.F., et al. Vandetanib in metastatic hereditary medullary thyroid cancer: Follow-up results of an open-label phase II trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2007; 25(18S):6018.). Initial results with motesanib diphophate (AMG 706), a multikinase inhibitor that targets VEGF, PDGF, RET, and Kit receptors, may also shown promise (Sherman SI, Schlumberger, M.J., Droz, J., Hoffman, M, et al. Initial results from a phase II trial of motesanib diphophate (AMG 706) in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2007; 25(18S):6017.)

Radiation therapy

Radiation therapy can palliate local disease when surgery is not feasible. Radiation therapy is effective in treating pain from bony metastases. However, the role for radiation to treat MTC in the neck is questionable. External beam radiation causes extensive scarring and fibrosis within the neck making future surgical interventions both difficult and potentially dangerous. Since the benefits of radiation therapy are not clear, and its use limits future surgical intervention, its use should be reserved for cases of known residual disease in which complete surgical resection is not possible. Radioactive iodine treatment is part of the standard treatment for papillary thyroid cancer, it has no role in the management of MTC since C-cells are not of thyroid follicular origin, radioactive iodine is not taken up in the C-cells.

Surgery

Approximately 50% of patients with MTC will develop recurrent disease. Calcitonin, CEA, and/or chromogranin A testing are very sensitive ways for detecting either residual or recurrent disease. When the post-operative biochemical markers are elevated, a careful metastatic evaluation should be performed prior to proceeding with operative exploration. Since neck re-operations are associated with significant risks, reoperation should only be pursued if there is significant likelihood of benefit. Patients with inadequate initial operations or those with only locoregional disease in the neck, surgical resection can and should be considered. Palliative operations in the neck can relieve local compression and other associated symptoms63. Several studies have confirmed that reoperative neck operations can normalize calcitonin levels in about a third of patients65,66.

Conclusion and future looking statements

MTC is a NE cancer for which surgery is the only curative therapy. Genetic testing for RET mutations have allowed potential cure for the 25% of patients with hereditary MTC. However, for the majority of patients with sporadic MTC, the disease cannot be controlled with current therapies. Thus, future treatment will likely exploit knowledge about the mechanisms and pathways which regulate the growth and metastatic phenotype of MTC. Several signaling pathways, such as the phosphatidyl-inositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, glycogen synthase kinase-3, mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs), and Notch/Hairy Enhancer of Split-1 (HES-1)/achaete-scute complex like-1 (ASCL1) signaling pathway, have also been shown to play important roles in regulating the growth of MTC67–73. Drugs which modify these signaling pathways are currently in clinical trials for patients with MTC.

Contributor Information

Herbert Chen, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin.

Rebecca S. Sippel, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin.

Karel Pacak, Reproductive Biology and Medicine Branch, Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

References

1. Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, Pacak K. Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):665–675. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. DeLellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, Eng C. Tumours of Endocrine Organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]

4. Elder EE, Elder G, Larsson C. Pheochromocytoma and functional paraganglioma syndrome: no longer the 10% tumor. J Surg Oncol. 2005;89(3):193–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Neumann HP, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, et al. Germ-line mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1459–1466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Barontini M, Levin G, Sanso G. Characteristics of pheochromocytoma in a 4- to 20-year-old population. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1073:30–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. De Krijger RR, Van Nederveen FH, Korpershoek E, De Herder WW, De Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM, Dinjens WN. Frequent genetic changes in childhood pheochromocytomas. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1073:166–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Ludwig AD, Feig DI, Brandt ML, Hicks MJ, Fitch ME, Cass DL. Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma in children. Am J Surg. 2007;194(6):792–796. discussion 6-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Benn DE, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Reilly JR, et al. Clinical presentation and penetrance of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(3):827–836. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Favier J, Rustin P, et al. Mutations in the SDHB gene are associated with extra-adrenal and/or malignant phaeochromocytomas. Cancer Res. 2003;63(17):5615–5621. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Bryant J, Farmer J, Kessler LJ, Townsend RR, Nathanson KL. Pheochromocytoma: the expanding genetic differential diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(16):1196–1204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Brouwers FM, Eisenhofer G, Tao JJ, et al. High Frequency of SDHB Germline Mutations in Patients with Malignant Catecholamine-Producing Paragangliomas: Implications for Genetic Testing. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4505–4509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Timmers HJ, Kozupa A, Eisenhofer G, et al. Clinical presentations, biochemical phenotypes, and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with succinate dehydrogenase subunit B-associated pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(3):779–786. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Amar L, Bertherat J, Baudin E, et al. Genetic testing in pheochromocytoma or functional paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(34):8812–8818. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Lenders JW, Pacak K, Walther MM, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best? JAMA. 2002;287(11):1427–1434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Eisenhofer G, Lenders J, Linehan W, Walther M, Goldstein D, Keiser H. Plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine for detecting pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1872–1879. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Sawka AM, Jaeschke R, Singh RJ, Young WF., Jr A comparison of biochemical tests for pheochromocytoma: measurement of fractionated plasma metanephrines compared with the combination of 24-hour urinary metanephrines and catecholamines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(2):553–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Lenders JW, Willemsen JJ, Eisenhofer G, et al. Is supine rest necessary before blood sampling for plasma metanephrines? Clin Chem. 2007;53(2):352–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Weise M, Merke D, Pacak K, Walther MM, Eisenhofer G. Utility of plasma free metanephrines for detecting childhood pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:1955–1960. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Zelinka T, Eisenhofer G, Pacak K. Pheochromocytoma as a catecholamine producing tumor: implications for clinical practice. Stress. 2007;10(2):195–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Grossman A, Pacak K, Sawka A, et al. Biochemical diagnosis and localization of pheochromocytoma: can we reach a consensus? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1073:332–347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Walther MM, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: how to distinguish true- from false-positive test results. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(6):2656–2666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS. Functional imaging of endocrine tumors: role of positron emission tomography. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(4):568–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Lumachi F, Tregnaghi A, Zucchetta P, et al. Sensitivity and positive predictive value of CT, MRI and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in localizing pheochromocytomas: a prospective study. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27(7):583–587. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. van der Harst E, de Herder WW, Bruining HA, et al. [(123)I]metaiodobenzylguanidine and [(111)In]octreotide uptake in begnign and malignant pheochromocytomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(2):685–693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Van Der Horst-Schrivers AN, Jager PL, Boezen HM, Schouten JP, Kema IP, Links TP. Iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in localising phaeochromocytomas--experience and meta-analysis. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(2B):1599–1604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Bhatia KS, Ismail MM, Sahdev A, et al. 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy for the detection of adrenal and extra-adrenal phaeochromocytomas: CT and MRI correlation. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008;69(2):181–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Mackenzie IS, Gurnell M, Balan KK, Simpson H, Chatterjee K, Brown MJ. The use of 18-fluoro-dihydroxyphenylalanine and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning in the assessment of metaiodobenzylguanidine-negative phaeochromocytoma. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157(4):533–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Ilias I, Yu J, Carrasquillo JA, et al. Superiority of 6-[18F]-fluorodopamine positron emission tomography versus [131I]-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy in the localization of metastatic pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(9):4083–4087. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Hoegerle S, Nitzsche E, Altehoefer C, et al. Pheochromocytomas: detection with 18F DOPA whole body PET--initial results. Radiology. 2002;222(2):507–512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Timmers HJ, Hadi M, Carrasquillo JA, et al. The effects of carbidopa on uptake of 6-18F-Fluoro-L-DOPA in PET of pheochromocytoma and extraadrenal abdominal paraganglioma. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(10):1599–1606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Shulkin BL, Koeppe RA, Francis IR, Deeb GM, Lloyd RV, Thompson NW. Pheochromocytomas that do not accumulate metaiodobenzylguanidine: localization with PET and administration of FDG. Radiology. 1993;186(3):711–715. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Shulkin BL, Thompson NW, Shapiro B, Francis IR, Sisson JC. Pheochromocytomas: Imaging with 2-[Fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET. Nucl Med. 1999;212:35–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Timmers HJ, Kozupa A, Chen CC, et al. Superiority of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to other functional imaging techniques in the evaluation of metastatic SDHB-associated pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(16):2262–2269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Pacak KLJ, Eisenhofer G. Pheochromocytoma; Diagnosis, Localization and treatment. 2007 [Google Scholar]

36. Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Ahlman H, et al. Pheochromocytoma: recommendations for clinical practice from the First International Symposium. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3(2):92–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Pacak K. Preoperative management of the pheochromocytoma patient. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(11):4069–4079. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Goldstein RE, O'Neill JA, Jr, Holcomb GW, 3rd, et al. Clinical experience over 48 years with pheochromocytoma. Ann Surg. 1999;229(6):755–764. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Hack HA. The perioperative management of children with phaeochromocytoma. Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;10(5):463–476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. Gedik GK, Hoefnagel CA, Bais E, Olmos RA. 131I-MIBG therapy in metastatic phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35(4):725–733. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

41. Averbuch SD, Steakley CS, Young RC, et al. Malignant pheochromocytoma: effective treatment with a combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dacarbazine. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109(4):267–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

42. van Essen M, Krenning EP, Kooij PP, et al. Effects of therapy with [177Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3]octreotate in patients with paraganglioma, meningioma, small cell lung carcinoma, and melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(10):1599–1606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

43. Pelizzo MR, Boschin IM, Bernante P, Toniato A, Piotto A, Pagetta C, Nibale O, Rampin L, Muzzio PC, Rubello D. Natural history, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of medullary thyroid cancer: 37 years experience on 157 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:493–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

44. Moley JF, Lairmore TC, Phay JE. Hereditary endocrinopathies. Curr Probl Surg. 1999;36:653–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

45. Ball DW. Medullary thyroid cancer: therapeutic targets and molecular markers. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007;19:18–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

46. Roman S, Lin R, Sosa JA. Prognosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma: demographic, clinical, and pathologic predictors of survival in 1252 cases. Cancer. 2006;107:2134–2142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

47. Lal A, Bianco J, Chen H. Radioguided parathyroidectomy in patients with familial hyperparathyroidism. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2007;14:739–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

48. Sippel RS, Kunnimalaiyaan M, Chen H. Current management of medullary thyroid cancer. Oncologist. 2008;13:539–547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

49. Hansford JR, Mulligan LM. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and RET: from neoplasia to neurogenesis [Review] Journal of Medical Genetics. 2000;37:817–827. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

50. Hansford JR, Mulligan LM. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and RET: from neoplasia to neurogenesis [Review] Journal of Medical Genetics. 2000;37:817–827. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

51. Kouvaraki MA, Shapiro SE, Perrier ND, Cote GJ, Gagel RF, Hoff AO, Sherman SI, Lee JE, Evans DB. RET proto-oncogene: a review and update of genotype-phenotype correlations in hereditary medullary thyroid cancer and associated endocrine tumors. Thyroid. 2005;15:531–544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

52. Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A, Bilezikian JP, Beck-Peccoz P, Bordi C, Conte-Devolx B, Falchetti A, Gheri RG, Libroia A, Lips CJ, Lombardi G, Mannelli M, Pacini F, Ponder BA, Raue F, Skogseid B, Tamburrano G, Thakker RV, Thompson NW, Tomassetti P, Tonelli F, Wells SA, Jr, Marx SJ. Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:5658–5671. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

53. Cohen R, Campos JM, Salaun C, Heshmati HM, Kraimps JL, Proye C, Sarfati E, Henry JF, Niccoli-sire P, Modigliani E. Preoperative calcitonin levels are predictive of tumor size and postoperative calcitonin normalization in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Groupe d'Etudes des Tumeurs a Calcitonine (GETC) J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:919–922. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

54. Barbet J, Campion L, Kraeber-Bodere F, Chatal JF. Prognostic impact of serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen doubling-times in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:6077–6084. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

55. Quayle FJ, Benveniste R, DeBenedetti MK, Wells SA, Moley JF. Hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma in patients greater than 50 years old. Surgery. 2004;136:1116–1121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

56. Tung WS, Vesely TM, Moley JF. Laparoscopic detection of hepatic metastases in patients with residual or recurrent medullary thyroid cancer. Surgery. 1995;118:1024–1029. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

57. Skinner MA, Moley JA, Dilley WG, Owzar K, DeBenedetti MK, Wells SA., Jr Prophylactic thyroidectomy in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1105–1113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

58. Moley JF, DeBenedetti MK. Patterns of nodal metastases in palpable medullary thyroid carcinoma: recommendations for extent of node dissection. Ann Surg. 1999;229:880–887. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

59. Greenblatt DY, Elson D, Mack E, Chen H. Initial lymph node dissection increases cure rates in patients with medullary thyroid cancer. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2007;30:108–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

60. Machens A, Hauptmann S, Dralle H. Increased risk of lymph node metastasis in multifocal hereditary and sporadic medullary thyroid cancer. World J Surg. 2007;31:1960–1965. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

61. Scollo C, Baudin E, Travagli JP, Caillou B, Bellon N, Leboulleux S, Schlumberger M. Rationale for central and bilateral lymph node dissection in sporadic and hereditary medullary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:2070–2075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

62. Kebebew E, Greenspan FS, Clark OH, Woeber KA, Grunwell J. Extent of disease and practice patterns for medullary thyroid cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:890–896. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

63. Chen H, Roberts JR, Ball DW, Eisele DW, Baylin SB, Udelsman R, Bulkley GB. Effective long-term palliation of symptomatic, incurable metastatic medullary thyroid cancer by operative resection. Ann Surg. 1998;227:887–895. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

64. de Groot JW, Zonnenberg BA, Ufford-Mannesse PQ, de Vries MM, Links TP, Lips CJ, Voest EE. A phase II trial of imatinib therapy for metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:3466–3469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

65. Moley JF, DeBenedetti MK, Dilley WG, Tisell LE, Wells SA. Surgical management of patients with persistent or recurrent medullary thyroid cancer. J Intern Med. 1998;243:521–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

66. Moley JF, Wells SA, Dilley WG, Tisell LE. Reoperation for recurrent or persistent medullary thyroid cancer. Surgery. 1993;114:1090–1095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

67. Van Gompel JJ, Kunnimalaiyaan M, Holen K, Chen H. ZM336372, a Raf-1 activator, suppresses growth and neuroendocrine hormone levels in carcinoid tumor cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2005;4:910–917. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

68. Ning L, Jaskula-Sztul R, Kunnimalaiyaan M, Chen H. Suberoyl Bishydroxamic Acid Activates Notch1 Signaling and Suppresses Tumor Progression in an Animal Model of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

69. Kunnimalaiyaan M, Vaccaro AM, Ndiaye MA, Chen H. Inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta, a downstream target of the raf-1 pathway, is associated with growth suppression in medullary thyroid cancer cells. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2007;6:1151–1158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

70. Kunnimalaiyaan M, Ndiaye M, Chen H. Apoptosis-mediated medullary thyroid cancer growth suppression by the PI3K inhibitor LY294002. Surgery. 2006;140:1009–1014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

71. Kunnimalaiyaan M, Vaccaro AM, Ndiaye MA, Chen H. Overexpression of the NOTCH1 intracellular domain inhibits cell proliferation and alters the neuroendocrine phenotype of medullary thyroid cancer cells. Journal of biological Chemistry. 2006;281:39819–39830. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

72. Sippel RS, Carpenter JE, Kunnimalaiyaan M, Chen H. The role of human achaete-scute homolog-1 in medullary thyroid cancer cells. Surgery. 2003;134:866–871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

73. Greenblatt DY, Cayo MA, Adler JT, Ning L, Haymart MR, Kunnimalaiyaan M, Chen H. Valproic acid activates Notch1 signaling and induces apoptosis in medullary thyroid cancer cells. Ann Surg. 2008;247:1036–1040. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]