Value-initialization - cppreference.com (original) (raw)

This is the initialization performed when an object is constructed with an empty initializer.

[edit] Syntax

T () (1)
new T () (2)
Class**::Class(...)** : member () { ... } (3)
T object {}; (4) (since C++11)
T {} (5) (since C++11)
new T {} (6) (since C++11)
Class**::Class(...)** : member {} { ... } (7) (since C++11)

[edit] Explanation

Value-initialization is performed in these situations:

1,5) when a nameless temporary object is created with the initializer consisting of an empty pair of parentheses or braces(since C++11);

2,6) when an object with dynamic storage duration is created by a new expression with the initializer consisting of an empty pair of parentheses or braces(since C++11);

3,7) when a non-static data member or a base class is initialized using a member initializer with an empty pair of parentheses or braces(since C++11);

  1. when a named object (automatic, static, or thread-local) is declared with the initializer consisting of a pair of braces.

In all cases, if the empty pair of braces {} is used and T is an aggregate type, aggregate initialization is performed instead of value-initialization.

The effects of value-initialization are:

[edit] Notes

The syntax T object(); does not initialize an object; it declares a function that takes no arguments and returns T. The way to value-initialize a named variable before C++11 was T object = T();, which value-initializes a temporary and then copy-initializes the object: most compilers optimize out the copy in this case.

References cannot be value-initialized.

As described in function-style cast, the syntax T() (1) is prohibited if T names an array type, while T{} (5) is allowed.

All standard containers (std::vector, std::list, etc.) value-initialize their elements when constructed with a single size_type argument or when grown by a call to resize(), unless their allocator customizes the behavior of construct.

[edit] Example

#include #include #include #include   struct T1 { int mem1; std::string mem2; virtual void foo() {} // make sure T1 is not an aggregate }; // implicit default constructor   struct T2 { int mem1; std::string mem2; T2(const T2&) {} // user-provided copy constructor }; // no default constructor   struct T3 { int mem1; std::string mem2; T3() {} // user-provided default constructor };   std::string s{}; // class => default-initialization, the value is ""   int main() { int n{}; // scalar => zero-initialization, the value is 0 assert(n == 0); double f = double(); // scalar => zero-initialization, the value is 0.0 assert(f == 0.0); int* a = new int10; // array => value-initialization of each element assert(a[9] == 0); // the value of each element is 0 T1 t1{}; // class with implicit default constructor => assert(t1.mem1 == 0); // t1.mem1 is zero-initialized, the value is 0 assert(t1.mem2 == ""); // t1.mem2 is default-initialized, the value is "" // T2 t2{}; // error: class with no default constructor T3 t3{}; // class with user-provided default constructor => std::cout << t3.mem1; // t3.mem1 is default-initialized to indeterminate value assert(t3.mem2 == ""); // t3.mem2 is default-initialized, the value is "" std::vector v(3); // value-initialization of each element assert(v[2] == 0); // the value of each element is 0 std::cout << '\n'; delete[] a; }

Possible output:

[edit] Defect reports

The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards.

DR Applied to Behavior as published Correct behavior
CWG 178 C++98 there was no value-initialization; empty initializer invoked default-initialization (though new T() also performs zero-initialization) empty initializer invokevalue-initialization
CWG 543 C++98 value-initialization for a class object without anyuser-provided constructors was equivalent to value-initializing each subobject (which need not zero-initialize a member with user-provided default constructor) zero-initializesthe entire object,then calls thedefault constructor
CWG 1301 C++11 value-initialization of unions with deleteddefault constructors led to zero-initialization they aredefault-initialized
CWG 1368 C++98 any user-provided constructor causedzero-initialization to be skipped only a user-provideddefault constructorskips zero-initialization
CWG 1502 C++11 value-initializing a union without a user-provideddefault constructor only zero-initialized theobject, despite default member initializers performs default-initialization afterzero-initialization
CWG 1507 C++98 value-initialization for a class object without anyuser-provided constructors did not check the validityof the default constructor when the latter is trivial the validity of trivialdefault constructoris checked
CWG 2820 C++98 the default-initialization following the zero-initialization required a non-trivial constructor not required
CWG 2859 C++98 value-initialization for a class object might involvezero-initialization even if the default-initializationdoes not actually select a user-provided constructor there is nozero-initializationin this case

[edit] See also