Maciej W. Rozycki - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59 (original) (raw)
This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki"
- To: Erik Christiansen
- Cc: Michael Eager , Alexandre Oliva , Ian Lance Taylor , "Joseph S. Myers" , Daniel Jacobowitz , Paolo Bonzini , gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org, newlib at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:58:40 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
- References: <45CB1C16.10407@lu.unisi.ch> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702081251340.12368@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20070208131821.GA2860@nevyn.them.org> <45CB28BB.8050805@lu.unisi.ch> <20070208141800.GA6649@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702081442160.25268@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <m37iuslmod.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45CB5453.3080109@eagercon.com> <or64ab9ajc.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <45CC20D0.2010200@eagercon.com> <20070209083424.GA7770@dd.nec.com.au>
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Erik Christiansen wrote:
--build seems to be a synonym for --host, so its only useful purpose that I've imagined so far is to specify a native build if configure fails to detect that to the user's satisfaction. (And that could be done with --host, if that did not spuriously trigger a cross.)
The "--build" option lets you specify your non-canonical name of the build system, e.g. if you want to have your native binutils installed under /usr/i386-linux/bin rather than /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin (in addition to /usr/bin that is).
Maciej
- References:
- Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Paolo Bonzini - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Joseph S. Myers - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Daniel Jacobowitz - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Paolo Bonzini - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Daniel Jacobowitz - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Joseph S. Myers - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Ian Lance Taylor - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Michael Eager - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Alexandre Oliva - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Michael Eager - Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
* From: Erik Christiansen
- Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |