Re: Final text of GPL v3 (original) (raw)
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Final text of GPL v3
- From: Sean Kellogg <skellogg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 00:24:58 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 200707010024.59940.skellogg@gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: 20070630185644.594f662e.frx@firenze.linux.it
- References: <1183167342.21261.45.camel@Skye> 20070630153129.GC31714@azure.humbug.org.au 20070630185644.594f662e.frx@firenze.linux.it
On Saturday 30 June 2007 09:56:44 am Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:31:29 +0100 Anthony Towns wrote:
Francesco is not a lawyer,
I explicitly wrote this disclaimer in my comment message ("The usual disclaimers: IANAL, IANADD."): I cannot understand why you seem to have such fun in pointing fingers at other people and repeating "he/she's not a lawyer!", "he/she's not a Debian developer!"...
Francesco... as I've said on this list before, "IANAL" is not a sufficient disclaimer. Nor is saying "this is not legal advice." There are laws, criminal laws, against the providing of legal advice by those who not certified by the Bar Association within the jurisdiction the advice is given in. There is no exception provided by adding disclaimers, there is only the question of whether or not legal advice was given.
You can raise questions as to whether something is, or is not, legal advice.
But definitive statements like "I wish it could, but I am afraid it
cannot..." in response to a question about the meaning of a particular term
in a legal document is arguably legal advice.
that isn't legal advice,
Since I explicitly noted that IANAL, it goes without saying that I cannot give legal advice.
This, of course, is patently false. Anyone can provide legal advice...
people do it all the time ("gee Bob, you should claim X on your taxes",
or "the judge will reduce your ticket if you show up in court", etc). You
don't have to be a lawyer to provide it, you just need to be a lawyer to do
so legally in those jursidictions that require certification. Of course, the
law is an awfully grey space, so there's lots of flexibility, and for the
most part lay-persons can get away with providing legal advice to their
friends because the relationship is clear. Here, on an email list
entitled "debian-legal" I think one might have a reasonable expectation that
actual lawyers were providing advice.
To that end, Mr. Towns' continued reminders that you are not, in fact, a lawyer, is helpful to those who may be mistaken that you are, as it would appear, providing legal advice.
-Sean
-- Sean Kellogg e: skellogg@gmail.com w: http://blog.probonogeek.org/
So, let go  ...Jump in  ...Oh well, what you waiting for?   ...it's all right   ...'Cause there's beauty in the breakdown
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Final text of GPL v3
* From: Ben Finney bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au - Re: Final text of GPL v3
* From: Gervase Markham gerv@mozilla.org - Re: Final text of GPL v3
* From: Mike Bird mgb@yosemite.net - Re: Final text of GPL v3
* From: Francesco Poli frx@firenze.linux.it - Stopping the HINALs, was: Final text of GPL v3
* From: MJ Ray mjr@phonecoop.coop - Re: Final text of GPL v3
* From: Josselin Mouette joss@debian.org
- Re: Final text of GPL v3
- Prev by Date:Re: Final text of GPL v3
- Next by Date:Re: Final text of GPL v3
- Previous by thread:Re: Final text of GPL v3
- Next by thread:Re: Final text of GPL v3
- Index(es):