Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:52:03 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070702195203.230b2604.frx@firenze.linux.it>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070702163113.GE6608@azure.humbug.org.au>
- References: <[🔎] gfhkl4-f04.ln1@argenau.downhill.at.eu.org> <[🔎] 20070701163856.0e296842.frx@firenze.linux.it> <[🔎] 20070702163113.GE6608@azure.humbug.org.au>
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:31:13 -0400 Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
Note that if we do stick to the view we've taken up until now, when we have a LGPLv3 only glibc in the archive, we'll no longer be able to distribute GPLv2-only compiled executables.
Unless the GPLv2-only work copyright holder(s) add(s) a special exception, similar to the one needed to link with the OpenSSL library, right?
This scenario is worrying me... :-(
-- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:<pgp050hTa303p.pgp>
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au - Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Walter Landry wlandry@ucsd.edu
- Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- References:
- LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Andreas Metzler ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org - Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Francesco Poli frx@firenze.linux.it - Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au
- LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Prev by Date:Re: Final text of GPL v3
- Next by Date:Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Previous by thread:Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Next by thread:Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Index(es):