Re: LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives (original) (raw)
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives
- From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13🔞17 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070709201817.GD4800@volo.donarmstrong.com>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87fy3xil60.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
- References: <[🔎] 9543b3a40707071020u5ddde90cvfd8ab17f0b373e13@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 87zm27n2hh.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <[🔎] 20070708005703.GU4800@volo.donarmstrong.com> <[🔎] 87fy3xil60.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
- Don Armstrong:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007, Ben Finney wrote:
An email has been judged sufficient for many Debian packages, if it unambiguously specifies all of the above, and is clearly from the copyright holder. Copy and paste into the 'debian/copyright' file the part of the message that has all that information, along with that message's 'date', 'from', 'message-id' fields.
Yeah; bonus points if the message is GPG signed by a key which is in and multiply connected to strongly connected set.
Yeah, as if this made it a particularly authoritative source for any kind of legal statement. 8-)
Short of having a notarized signed statement, it's the best we can do; while there are obviously methods of exploiting it, it's clearly better than just an e-mail. Most importantly, it allows us to have a reasonable belief that the copyright holder has actually licensed us to distribute the work.
Don Armstrong
-- Where I sleep at night, is this important compared to what I read during the day? What do you think defines me? Where I slept or what I did all day? -- Thomas Van Orden of Van Orden v. Perry
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives
* From: Florian Weimer fw@deneb.enyo.de
- Re: LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives
- References:
- LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives
* From: "Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso" jordigh@gmail.com - Re: LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives
* From: Ben Finney bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au - Re: LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives
* From: Don Armstrong don@debian.org - Re: LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives
* From: Florian Weimer fw@deneb.enyo.de
- LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives
- Prev by Date:Re: whichwayisup: CC-v3.0 licenses do not meet the DFSG
- Next by Date:GPL v3 app with copied GPLv2 or later source and linked against LGPL-2 or later libraries
- Previous by thread:Re: LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives
- Next by thread:Re: LiDIA's statement of GPL only in mailing list archives
- Index(es):