Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty (original) (raw)
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- From: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@freenet.de>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:01:00 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070713150100.GR3558@freenet.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070701163856.0e296842.frx@firenze.linux.it>
- References: <[🔎] gfhkl4-f04.ln1@argenau.downhill.at.eu.org> <[🔎] 20070701163856.0e296842.frx@firenze.linux.it>
############################################################
ATTENTION: I am currently NOT in Strasbourg because
haveing the last 4 weeks of my military
service and can not reply in short delays.
############################################################
Hello *,
Am 2007-07-01 16:38:56, schrieb Francesco Poli:
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:58:08 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
LGPLv3 libraries could not be used in GPLv2-only programs.
I'm afraid that this incompatibility is still true.
AFAIUI, when you redistribute a GPLv2-only program in compiled form, the GPLv2 insists that the libraries the program links with (excluding system libraries...) are available under GPLv2.
But an LGPLv3-only or LGPLv3-or-later library is available under GPLv3, not under GPLv2.
All this, assuming that the FSF's legal theory of linking is correct: this theory has never been tested in court, AFAIK, hence we do not know if it would hold. However, we have to assume that it's correct, to be on the safe side.
Disclaimers: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD.
Question:
I have coded some programs which are explicit under GPL v2 since I do not like v3 (I have my reasons) but I am using a LIB which is currently under LGPL v2.
Now the new version of this LIB is v3.
What should I do?
Push the source of the LIB v2 into my executable since I can not distribute the same LIB (physical) because namespace conflicts ?
It seems that I am using 7 libs which will switch to LGPL v3 and I am already using parts of libc-client (I do not want to use the pop3 part in any case and have some restrictions made to the source). Should I pull out all needed functions and put it into my own source?
Two of those 7 LIB's are a WebDAV and a Calendar client library.
This stuff is realy confusing...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
-- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##################### Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi 0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: "Anthony W. Youngman" debian@thewolery.demon.co.uk
- Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- References:
- LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Andreas Metzler ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org - Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
* From: Francesco Poli frx@firenze.linux.it
- LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Prev by Date:Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- Next by Date:Debian Logo license infringement
- Previous by thread:Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Next by thread:Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty
- Index(es):