Re: Why is firebird in Debian? (original) (raw)
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Why is firebird in Debian?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:40:46 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070720004046.GA10171@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070718235809.3945e9b2.frx@firenze.linux.it>
- References: <[🔎] 20070718235809.3945e9b2.frx@firenze.linux.it>
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
It is my opinion that the MPL license fails to meet the DFSG. This opinion seems to be shared by other debian-legal regulars:
The MPL is an accepted license for main. I'm sorry your opinion differs, and that the views of other non-DDs and non-maintainers on the matter have gone uncorrected and left the misleading impression that there's any question as to whether the MPL is suitable for main.
Cheers, aj
Attachment:signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is firebird in Debian?
* From: Walter Landry wlandry@ucsd.edu - Re: Why is firebird in Debian?
* From: Francesco Poli frx@firenze.linux.it - Re: Why is firebird in Debian?
* From: Josselin Mouette joss@debian.org - Re: Why is firebird in Debian?
* From: Dan Serban dserban@lodgingcompany.com
- Re: Why is firebird in Debian?
- References:
- Why is firebird in Debian?
* From: Francesco Poli frx@firenze.linux.it
- Why is firebird in Debian?
- Prev by Date:Re: Why is firebird in Debian?
- Next by Date:Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- Previous by thread:Re: Why is firebird in Debian?
- Next by thread:Re: Why is firebird in Debian?
- Index(es):