Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1 (original) (raw)
- To: 869692@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1
- From: Federico Brega <charon.66@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 21:16:08 +0200
- Message-id: <[๐] CAEkcnVTJ4TxPaaUYEsJGV4WLtCDZymO3fVtawa8LWvQsUeQyvA@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Federico Brega <charon.66@gmail.com>, 869692@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: 20170829182112.rpydg6go2ezmkhmt@belkar.wrar.name
- References: <150100447253.2381.5040213820357850751.reportbug@mercurius> <CAEkcnVToyXR=taZKA5hm-zsKmn6JxYseCJCcNJssx1X6JE_hew@mail.gmail.com> 20170829182112.rpydg6go2ezmkhmt@belkar.wrar.name <150100447253.2381.5040213820357850751.reportbug@mercurius>
Please update Standards-Version to he current version. Done. This triggers a warning in lintian, which only knows about 4.0.0 This warning is displayed also by other packages already in Debian and nobody put in place an override for this warning so I though I should do the same. Debian policy 4.1.0 ยง4.15 is about reproducibility, which I was already targeting, but it is not 100% clear how can I be sure that my package is reproducible. I built the package twice and the binary packages are identical, but I don't know if this is enough. Priority from extra to optional is now part of the policy so this is reflected in the changelog.
Shipping files like /usr/share/pixmaps/new.svg seems very wrong, they should be in a package-specific dir (and not under /usr/share/pixmaps). All icons are now moved in /usr/share/cyclograph/icons with the exception of the application icon, which is now also in 48x48 as required by freedesktop specifications. A couple more sizes have been provided in png format.
Qt frontend doesn't work: ImportError: cannot import name 'QtWebEngineWidgets' Added the missing dependency to qtwebengine
You shouldn't use the full icon paths in .desktop Icon, definitely not ones for 32x32. I ran desktop-file-validate and it mislead me to add the full path, The file extension should have been removed, and now they are.
Regards
Federico
Reply to:
- Prev by Date:Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]
- Next by Date:Bug#873822: marked as done (RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA])
- Previous by thread:Bug#872022: marked as done (RFS: evolution/3.22.6-1.1 [NMU])
- Next by thread:Bug#873822: marked as done (RFS: achilles/2-9 [QA])
- Index(es):