Bug#876027: marked as done (RFS: libcgicc/3.2.19-0.2 [NMU] -- C++ class library for writing CGI applications) (original) (raw)




Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:23:23 +0000 (UTC) with message-id 339853808.6688087.1505723003273@mail.yahoo.com and subject line Re: Bug#876027: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.19-0.2 [NMU] -- C++ class library for writing CGI applications has caused the Debian Bug report #876027, regarding RFS: libcgicc/3.2.19-0.2 [NMU] -- C++ class library for writing CGI applications to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.)

-- 876027: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876027 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcgicc"

It builds those binary packages:

libcgicc-dev - C++ class library for writing CGI applications (development files libcgicc-doc - C++ class library for writing CGI applications (documentation)

libcgicc3 - C++ class library for writing CGI applications (library)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcgicc

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libcgicc/libcgicc_3.2.19-0.2.dsc

More information about cgicc can be obtained from http://www.gnu.org/software/cgicc/.

Changes since the last upload:

* Move the old-style config file to the multi-arch directory under /usr/lib

(Closes: #874225).

I have deferred the package by 10 days to give the maintainer the opportunity to intervene, should he wish to do so.

Regards, Thomas Pircher

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

Hello,

yes, you have a good point there... I have uploaded a new version that just removes the -fdebug-prefix-map option from the old-style config file.

I didn't get the sed regex, so it is fine for me :p (I'm joking, it is fine for me)

Let me know if there are any other problems.

multi-arch was mispelled in changelog, will sponsor in deferred/10 and pinging the bug report

G.

--- End Message ---


Reply to: