[llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target? (original) (raw)
Derek Schuff via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 19 16:31:17 PDT 2018
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Next message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Also this is a good time to discuss buildbots. We're willing to support a continuous builder that runs WebAssembly-specific stuff if that would be useful. Currently we have wasm-specific code in clang and lld (but since clang doesn't conditionally compile target support, that's already being tested), as well as LLVM proper. My understanding is that all of the bots on the default waterfall include a subset of the targets, so it would make sense to add e.g. a clang-wasm-linux or llvm-wasm-linux bot. Assuming that's true, do folks think it would be best to add something to http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ or would there be a better idea?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:59 PM Dan Gohman via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
Hi Eric,
We've been waiting until we stabilize various key interfaces, including the builtin functions, the C ABI, and the .o file format., as we'd like to avoid having users using packaged versions of LLVM producing C/C++ source files or .o/.a files that end up being incompatible with newer versions of LLVM. To my knowledge, all of the major issues are fixed now, and the only remaining blocker is that we need to decide what to do here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43675 (Rename imported/exported memory symbol _to linearmemory) Dan
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: Hi All,
WebAssembly has been around for a while now, it's still being actively worked on and used. I think it's long past time we make it a normal target so that it gets tested on a regular basis. (Most recent random breakage is https://reviews.llvm.org/rL342576 which fails make check with web assembly enabled). Any objections? I'll probably do this next week unless someone raises a strong objection here. Thanks! -eric
LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180919/929294a0/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Next message: [llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]