[llvm-dev] WebAssembly into normal Target? (original) (raw)

Eric Christopher via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 19 17:33:56 PDT 2018

Hi Dan,

Sure. That said I think people are just doing it anyhow :)

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:59 PM Dan Gohman <sunfish at mozilla.com> wrote:

Hi Eric,

We've been waiting until we stabilize various key interfaces, including the builtin functions, the C ABI, and the .o file format., as we'd like to avoid having users using packaged versions of LLVM producing C/C++ source files or .o/.a files that end up being incompatible with newer versions of LLVM. To my knowledge, all of the major issues are fixed now, and the only remaining blocker is that we need to decide what to do here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43675 (Rename imported/exported memory symbol _to linearmemory) On the bright side we just had a release so you'll have 6 mos to get that ironed out? :)

Anyhow, can't tell if this is an objection on your part or not?

-eric

Dan

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: Hi All,

WebAssembly has been around for a while now, it's still being actively worked on and used. I think it's long past time we make it a normal target so that it gets tested on a regular basis. (Most recent random breakage is https://reviews.llvm.org/rL342576 which fails make check with web assembly enabled). Any objections? I'll probably do this next week unless someone raises a strong objection here. Thanks! -eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180919/1d862cbc/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list