[llvm-dev] Moving the AVR backend out of experimental (original) (raw)

Tom Stellard via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 14 16:05:43 PST 2020

On 02/14/2020 09:13 AM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote:

What do you see as the pros and cons of making it a stable target? Does anyone else have any concerns about doing so?

My only concern with AVR is having active mantainers. It doesn't seem to have had much development in the last 6 months.

-Tom

-Chris

On Feb 14, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:

+better dylanmckay address On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:58 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org <mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote: Hi, There was a thread a few days ago about the expectations for experimental targets. At the moment, the only experimental target is AVR. It's been in the tree for a long time now, and generally seems well-behaved. Should we just make it a normal target? Nico

LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list