[llvm-dev] Moving the AVR backend out of experimental (original) (raw)

Nico Weber via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 14 17:54:59 PST 2020

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 7:05 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote:

On 02/14/2020 09:13 AM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > What do you see as the pros and cons of making it a stable target? Does anyone else have any concerns about doing so? >

My only concern with AVR is having active mantainers. It doesn't seem to have had much development in the last 6 months.

https://reviews.llvm.org/p/dylanmckay/ looks reasonably active to me. And it looks a lot more active than e.g. XCore :)

-Tom > -Chris > >> On Feb 14, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <_ _llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> +better dylanmckay address >> >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:58 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org_ _<mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> There was a thread a few days ago about the expectations for experimental targets. At the moment, the only experimental target is AVR. It's been in the tree for a long time now, and generally seems well-behaved. >> >> Should we just make it a normal target? >> >> Nico >> _>> ________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > > _> ________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200214/5c6da520/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list