[Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0 (original) (raw)
Eric Jonas jonas at MIT.EDU
Fri Jun 30 15:45:38 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 12:35 -0400, Sasha wrote:
> Besides, decent unit tests will catch these problems. We all know > that every scientific code in existence is unit tested to the smallest > routine, so this shouldn't be a problem for anyone.
Is this a joke? Did anyone ever measured the coverage of numpy unittests? I would be surprized if it was more than 10%.
Given the coverage is so low, how can people help by contributing unit tests? Are there obvious areas with poor coverage? Travis, do you have any opinions on this? ...Eric
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]