[Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0 (original) (raw)

Tim Leslie tim.leslie at gmail.com
Fri Jun 30 20:42:13 EDT 2006

On 7/1/06, Eric Jonas <jonas at mit.edu> wrote:

On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 12:35 -0400, Sasha wrote: > > Besides, decent unit tests will catch these problems. We all know > > that every scientific code in existence is unit tested to the smallest > > routine, so this shouldn't be a problem for anyone. > > Is this a joke? Did anyone ever measured the coverage of numpy > unittests? I would be surprized if it was more than 10%.

Given the coverage is so low, how can people help by contributing unit tests? Are there obvious areas with poor coverage? Travis, do you have any opinions on this? ...Eric

A handy tool for finding these things out is coverage.py. I've found it quite helpful in checking unittest coverage in the past.

http://www.nedbatchelder.com/code/modules/coverage.html

I don't think I'll have a chance in the immediate future to try it out with numpy, but if someone does, I'm sure it will give some answers to your questions Eric.

Cheers,

Tim Leslie

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642

Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion at lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list