[Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0 (original) (raw)
Travis N. Vaught travis at enthought.com
Fri Jun 30 12:40:14 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sasha wrote:
On 6/30/06, Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:
... Besides, decent unit tests will catch these problems. We all know that every scientific code in existence is unit tested to the smallest routine, so this shouldn't be a problem for anyone.
Is this a joke? Did anyone ever measured the coverage of numpy unittests? I would be surprized if it was more than 10%. Very obviously a joke...uh...with the exception of enthought-written scientific code, of course ;-)
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]