[Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0 (original) (raw)
Keith Goodman kwgoodman at gmail.com
Fri Jun 30 12:43:55 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 6/30/06, Sasha <ndarray at mac.com> wrote:
On 6/30/06, Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote: > ... > Besides, decent unit tests will catch these problems. We all know > that every scientific code in existence is unit tested to the smallest > routine, so this shouldn't be a problem for anyone.
Is this a joke? Did anyone ever measured the coverage of numpy unittests? I would be surprized if it was more than 10%.
That's a conundrum. A joke is no longer a joke once you point out, yes it is a joke.
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]