[Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct (original) (raw)
Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers at gmail.com
Wed Aug 15 00:30:24 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey <_ _p.e.creasey.00 at googlemail.com> wrote: +1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just seems a bigger surface area to maintain. Personally I already assumed Scipy's "honour[ing] diversity in..." did not imply any protection of behaviours that violate the CoC itself, but if you wanted to be really explicit you could add "to the extent that these do not conflict with this code of conduct." to that line.
I prefer that to the proposed modification, short and sweet.
This edit to the SciPy CoC has now been merged.
It looks to me like we're good to go here and take over the SciPy CoC.
Cheers, Ralf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20180814/002bf399/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]