[Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct (original) (raw)
Jarrod Millman millman at berkeley.edu
Wed Aug 15 00:49:37 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
+1
Jarrod
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey <p.e.creasey.00 at googlemail.com> wrote: +1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just seems a bigger surface area to maintain. Personally I already assumed Scipy's "honour[ing] diversity in..." did not imply any protection of behaviours that violate the CoC itself, but if you wanted to be really explicit you could add "to the extent that these do not conflict with this code of conduct." to that line. I prefer that to the proposed modification, short and sweet. This edit to the SciPy CoC has now been merged. It looks to me like we're good to go here and take over the SciPy CoC. Cheers, Ralf
NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]