[python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Mon Jan 15 19:47:55 EST 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 14:42 Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org> wrote:
Hi Brett, Stability doesn't appear to be a problem, but we have much less parallelism on AppVeyor than we do on Travis-CI. This may make waiting times longer than they used to be. Apparently 3.6 builds (and perhaps 2.7) trigger two sequential AppVeyor jobs: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/python/cpython/build/3.6build10551
If the wait times become an issue for anyone then let me know and we can re-evaluate the situation.
-Brett
Regards Antoine. Le 10/01/2018 à 21:45, Brett Cannon a écrit : > I just switched it on to help make sure we don't break on Windows just > before hitting beta. If it turns out AppVeyor isn't stable enough I will > switch it back off. > > _> ________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
python-committers mailing list python-committers at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20180116/39f3c2c4/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] AppVeyor is now required to pass on PRs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]