[Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Objectsunicodeobject.c, 2.204, 2.205 (original) (raw)
Tim Peters tim.one at comcast.net
Sat Dec 20 21:52:03 EST 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Objectsunicodeobject.c, 2.204, 2.205
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Objectsunicodeobject.c, 2.204, 2.205
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Skip Montanaro]
Isn't that supposed to always be defined in limits.h or is UCHARMAX not a standard macro?
Yes, it's supposed to be there. OTOH, so is limits.h, i.e. the HAVE_LIMITS_H test shouldn't be necessary either. So they're just sanity checks. But you're right, if UCHAR_MAX isn' defined, I was thinking the preprocessor would expand
#if UCHAR_MAX != 255
to
#if != 255
and then the error message would be incomprehensible. But unknown names in preprocessor conditionals actually get replaced by 0, and
#if 0 != 255
does just as well.
Sounds like a plan. I modify my local source and see if it affects anything.
It should work fine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Objectsunicodeobject.c, 2.204, 2.205
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Objectsunicodeobject.c, 2.204, 2.205
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]