[Python-Dev] a suggestion ... Re: PEP 383 (again) (original) (raw)
Thomas Breuel tmbdev at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 12:56:03 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] a suggestion ... Re: PEP 383 (again)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] a suggestion ... Re: PEP 383 (again)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:32, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> OK, so what's wrong with os.listdir() and similar functions returning a > unicode string for strings that correctly encode/decode, and with byte > strings for strings that are not valid unicode?
See http://bugs.python.org/issue3187 in particular msg71655
Why didn't you point to that discussion from the PEP 383? And why didn't you point to Kowalczyk's message on encodings in Mono, Java, etc. from the PEP? You could have saved us all a lot of time.
Under the set of constraints that Guido imposes, plus the requirement that round-trip works for illegal encodings, there is no other solution than PEP 383. That doesn't make PEP 383 right--I still think it's a bad decision--but it makes it pointless to discuss it any further.
Tom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090430/5ed6dac1/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] a suggestion ... Re: PEP 383 (again)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] a suggestion ... Re: PEP 383 (again)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]