[Python-Dev] a suggestion ... Re: PEP 383 (again) (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Thu Apr 30 14:25:28 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] a suggestion ... Re: PEP 383 (again)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] a suggestion ... Re: PEP 383 (again)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Why didn't you point to that discussion from the PEP 383? And why didn't you point to Kowalczyk's message on encodings in Mono, Java, etc. from the PEP?
Because I assumed that readers of the PEP would know (and I'm sure many of them do - this has been really discussed over and over again).
Under the set of constraints that Guido imposes, plus the requirement that round-trip works for illegal encodings, there is no other solution than PEP 383.
Well, there actually is an alternative: expose byte-oriented interfaces in parallel with the string-oriented ones. In the rationale, the PEP explains why I consider this the worse choice.
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] a suggestion ... Re: PEP 383 (again)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] a suggestion ... Re: PEP 383 (again)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]