[Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] PEP 3156 - Asynchronous IO Support Rebooted (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sat Dec 22 02:24:15 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] PEP 3156 - Asynchronous IO Support Rebooted
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3156 - Asynchronous IO Support Rebooted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre at mecheye.net> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
... snip ...
In PEP 3156 conformant code you're supposed always to use 'yield from'. The only time you see a bare yield is when it's part of the implementation's internals. (However I think tulip actually will handle a yield the same way as a yield from, except that it's slower because it makes a roundtrip to the scheduler, a.k.a. trampoline.) Would it be possible to fail on "yield"? Silently being slower when you forget to type a keyword is something I can imagine will creep up a lot by mistake, and I don't think it's a good idea to silently be slower when the only different is five more characters.
That's also a possibility. If someone can figure out a patch that would be great.
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] PEP 3156 - Asynchronous IO Support Rebooted
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3156 - Asynchronous IO Support Rebooted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]