[Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] PEP 3156 - Asynchronous IO Support Rebooted (original) (raw)
Jasper St. Pierre jstpierre at mecheye.net
Sat Dec 22 02:17:16 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] PEP 3156 - Asynchronous IO Support Rebooted
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] PEP 3156 - Asynchronous IO Support Rebooted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
... snip ...
In PEP 3156 conformant code you're supposed always to use 'yield
from'. The only time you see a bare yield is when it's part of the implementation's internals. (However I think tulip actually will handle a yield the same way as a yield from, except that it's slower because it makes a roundtrip to the scheduler, a.k.a. trampoline.)
Would it be possible to fail on "yield"? Silently being slower when you forget to type a keyword is something I can imagine will creep up a lot by mistake, and I don't think it's a good idea to silently be slower when the only different is five more characters.
Will comment more as I keep reading I'm sure :)
Please do! -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
-- Jasper -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121221/fcc73cd9/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] PEP 3156 - Asynchronous IO Support Rebooted
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] PEP 3156 - Asynchronous IO Support Rebooted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]