[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers) (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Oct 29 20:22:34 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:56:57 -0400 Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
To see if the bad iterativecount and threadedcount results were consistently bad, I ran the benchmark suite on my MacBook Pro to see how "reliable" the benchmarks were. The output is below.
Basically 6 benchmarks (regexeffbot, queens, startupnosite, iterativecount, threadedcount, and telco) had a variance of more than 15% performance between my 2 computers, although queens, iterativecount, and threadedcount were the only ones that swung between neutral/good to bad depending on the machine (the rest either want from bad to very bad, or very good to more very good).
This is using different compilers on the 2 computers, right?
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]