[Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers) (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Mon Oct 29 21:01:18 CET 2012
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Anyone have a Universal setter example?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:56:57 -0400 Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> To see if the bad iterativecount and threadedcount results were > consistently bad, I ran the benchmark suite on my MacBook Pro to see how > "reliable" the benchmarks were. The output is below. > > Basically 6 benchmarks (regexeffbot, queens, startupnosite, > iterativecount, threadedcount, and telco) had a variance of more than 15% > performance between my 2 computers, although queens, iterativecount, and > threadedcount were the only ones that swung between neutral/good to bad > depending on the machine (the rest either want from bad to very bad, or > very good to more very good). This is using different compilers on the 2 computers, right?
Yes: gcc 4.6.3 on Linux and Clang 3.1 on OS X. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20121029/387a364a/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 3.3 vs. Python 2.7 benchmark results (again, but this time more solid numbers)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Anyone have a Universal setter example?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]