[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19330: Handle the no-docstrings case in tests (original) (raw)
Serhiy Storchaka storchaka at gmail.com
Sat Oct 26 17:10:33 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19330: Handle the no-docstrings case in tests
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19330: Handle the no-docstrings case in tests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
26.10.13 15:50, Stefan Krah написав(ла):
nick.coghlan <python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a9bbc2d0c1dc -HAVEDOCSTRINGS = (checkimpldetail(cpython=False) or - sys.platform == 'win32' or - sysconfig.getconfigvar('WITHDOCSTRINGS')) +# Rather than trying to enumerate all the cases where docstrings may be +# disabled, we just check for that directly + +def checkdocstrings(): + """Just used to check if docstrings are enabled""" + +HAVEDOCSTRINGS = (checkdocstrings.doc is not None)
requiresdocstrings = unittest.skipUnless(HAVEDOCSTRINGS, I think that does not detect --without-doc-strings (i.e. the C docstrings are empty).
Indeed. HAVE_DOCSTRINGS was introduced to skip tests for the C docstrings. Python docstrings tests are skipped if sys.flags.optimize >= 2.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19330: Handle the no-docstrings case in tests
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19330: Handle the no-docstrings case in tests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]