[Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement? (original) (raw)
Donald Stufft donald at stufft.io
Fri Sep 27 21:10:43 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 27, 2013, at 2:50 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
I add: for 2.7/3.3, there is consequently no need for ensurepip to be in /Lib after installation, even if temporarily added*. If it is not there, there is no change the the stdlib, and hence no violation of the 'no new features' policy. The optional installation of pip is not a change to Python itself.
This sounds like a really bad idea to me. You're going to end up with a different stdlib not only by minor release, but by if they installed through an installer or not.
Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130927/1c7a9ce8/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]