[Python-Dev] Confirming status of new modules in 3.4 (original) (raw)

Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sat Mar 15 03:17:02 CET 2014

I don't think so. asyncio depends on selectors but not vice versa. The selectors module was not part of PEP 3156. It is solid and I don't see any reason why it should get a reprieve from the usual strict backwards compatibility standards.

--Guido

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' <g.rodola at gmail.com>wrote:

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:25 PM, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com>wrote: Not Provisional:

selectors

Wouldn't it be wiser to consider this one provisional as well? +1 because of the intimate ties to asyncio Eli

-- Giampaolo - http://grodola.blogspot.com

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/eliben%40gmail.com

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org

-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140314/a8c8aa88/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list