[Python-Dev] [Question][Asyncio] Process + Threads + asyncio... has sense? (original) (raw)
cr0hn cr0hn at cr0hn.com
Mon Apr 18 06:05:28 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] My first post here ~ do you need more Python core developers on Windows?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [Question][Asyncio] Process + Threads + asyncio... has sense?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all,
It's the first time I write in this list. Sorry if it's not the best place for this question.
After I read the Asyncio's documentation, PEPs, Guido/Jesse/David Beazley articles/talks, etc, I developed a PoC library that mixes: Process + Threads + Asyncio Tasks, doing an scheme like this diagram:
main -> Process 1 -> Thread 1.1 -> Task 1.1.1 -> Task 1.1.2 -> Task 1.1.3
-> Thread 1.2
-> Task 1.2.1
-> Task 1.2.2
-> Task 1.2.3
Process 2 -> Thread 2.1 -> Task 2.1.1
-> Task 2.1.2
-> Task 2.1.3
-> Thread 2.2
-> Task 2.2.1
-> Task 2.2.2
-> Task 2.2.3In my local tests, this approach appear to improve (and simplify) the concurrency/parallelism for some tasks but, before release the library at github, I don't know if my aproach is wrong and I would appreciate your opinion.
Thank you very much for your time.
Regards!
-- Daniel García a.k.a. cr0hn - Security researcher and pentester @ggdaniel http://www.cr0hn.com/me/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160418/ff7b1d1f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] My first post here ~ do you need more Python core developers on Windows?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [Question][Asyncio] Process + Threads + asyncio... has sense?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]