[Python-Dev] [Question][Asyncio] Process + Threads + asyncio... has sense? (original) (raw)

Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Mon Apr 18 12:40:14 EDT 2016

A better place for this question would be the tulip Google group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/python-tulip

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:05 AM, cr0hn <cr0hn at cr0hn.com> wrote:

Hi all,

It's the first time I write in this list. Sorry if it's not the best place for this question. After I read the Asyncio's documentation, PEPs, Guido/Jesse/David Beazley articles/talks, etc, I developed a PoC library that mixes: Process + Threads + Asyncio Tasks, doing an scheme like this diagram: main -> Process 1 -> Thread 1.1 -> Task 1.1.1 -> Task 1.1.2 -> Task 1.1.3 -> Thread 1.2 -> Task 1.2.1 -> Task 1.2.2 -> Task 1.2.3 Process 2 -> Thread 2.1 -> Task 2.1.1 -> Task 2.1.2 -> Task 2.1.3 -> Thread 2.2 -> Task 2.2.1 -> Task 2.2.2 -> Task 2.2.3 In my local tests, this approach appear to improve (and simplify) the concurrency/parallelism for some tasks but, before release the library at github, I don't know if my aproach is wrong and I would appreciate your opinion. Thank you very much for your time. Regards! -- Daniel García a.k.a. cr0hn - Security researcher and pentester @ggdaniel http://www.cr0hn.com/me/

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org

-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160418/a16337ef/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list