dbo:abstract |
Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital, 1 A.3d 823 (2010), is a New Jersey legal case concerning whether a hospital may unilaterally refuse care to a patient on the grounds that it is futile to prolong the person's life because there is little chance that the condition will improve. It has become the focal point of the ongoing debate surrounding denial of care among professional bioethicists. (en) |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
http://thaddeuspope.com/images/Betancourt_v_trinitas_3-4_2_.pdf https://caselaw.findlaw.com/nj-superior-court-appellate-division/1535060.html https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=93414388201309657 https://www.leagle.com/decision/innjco20100813248 |
dbo:wikiPageID |
27814516 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageLength |
8683 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1119764504 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Encephalopathy dbc:History_of_Elizabeth,_New_Jersey dbc:2010_in_New_Jersey dbc:Medical_lawsuits dbr:Elizabeth,_New_Jersey dbr:Mootness dbc:Euthanasia_in_the_United_States dbr:New_Jersey_Superior_Court,_Appellate_Division dbr:Persistent_vegetative_state dbc:New_Jersey_state_case_law dbr:Catholic_Church dbc:Euthanasia_law dbr:Atlantic_Reporter dbr:Wesley_J._Smith dbc:2010_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Bioethics dbr:Do_not_resuscitate dbr:New_Jersey dbr:Karen_Ann_Quinlan_case dbr:Per_curiam dbr:Legal_guardianship dbr:Bioethicists dbr:Trinitas_Hospital dbr:Thaddeus_Mason_Pope |
dbp:case |
25920.0 (dbd:second) |
dbp:citations |
; 415 N.J. Super. 301 (en) |
dbp:court |
dbr:New_Jersey_Superior_Court,_Appellate_Division |
dbp:dateDecided |
2010-08-13 (xsd:date) |
dbp:decisionBy |
Per curiam (en) |
dbp:findlaw |
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/nj-superior-court-appellate-division/1535060.html |
dbp:fullName |
Jacqueline Betancourt, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Trinitas Hospital, Defendant-Appellant. (en) |
dbp:googlescholar |
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=93414388201309657 |
dbp:judges |
Philip Carchman, Anthony Parrillo, Victor Ashrafi (en) |
dbp:leagle |
https://www.leagle.com/decision/innjco20100813248 |
dbp:name |
Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital (en) |
dbp:numberOfJudges |
3 (xsd:integer) |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:More_citations_needed dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Start_date dbt:Use_American_English dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Law_report dbt:Medical_ethics_cases dbt:Infobox_court_case |
dct:subject |
dbc:History_of_Elizabeth,_New_Jersey dbc:2010_in_New_Jersey dbc:Medical_lawsuits dbc:Euthanasia_in_the_United_States dbc:New_Jersey_state_case_law dbc:Euthanasia_law dbc:2010_in_United_States_case_law |
rdfs:comment |
Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital, 1 A.3d 823 (2010), is a New Jersey legal case concerning whether a hospital may unilaterally refuse care to a patient on the grounds that it is futile to prolong the person's life because there is little chance that the condition will improve. It has become the focal point of the ongoing debate surrounding denial of care among professional bioethicists. (en) |
rdfs:label |
Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital (en) |
owl:sameAs |
freebase:Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital yago-res:Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital wikidata:Betancourt v. Trinitas Hospital https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4Xdom |
prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Betancourt_v._Trinitas_Hospital?oldid=1119764504&ns=0 |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Betancourt_v._Trinitas_Hospital |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Betancourt_v._Trinitas dbr:Ruben_Betancourt dbr:Betancourt_v._Trinitas_Regional_Medical_Center dbr:Trinitas_Hospital dbr:Trinitas_Regional_Medical_Center_v._Betancourt dbr:Trinitas_v._Betancourt |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:List_of_medical_ethics_cases dbr:Persistent_vegetative_state dbr:Betancourt_v._Trinitas dbr:In_re_Quinlan dbr:Ruben_Betancourt dbr:Betancourt_v._Trinitas_Regional_Medical_Center dbr:Trinitas_Hospital dbr:Trinitas_Regional_Medical_Center_v._Betancourt dbr:Trinitas_v._Betancourt |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Betancourt_v._Trinitas_Hospital |