Navarette v. California (original) (raw)

About DBpedia

Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. 393 (2014), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified when police officers may make arrests or conduct temporary detentions based on information provided by anonymous tips. In 2008, police in California received a 911 call that a pickup truck was driving recklessly along a rural highway. Officers spotted a truck matching the description provided in the 911 call and followed the truck for five minutes, but did not observe any suspicious behavior. Nevertheless, officers conducted a traffic stop and discovered 30 pounds (14 kg) of marijuana in the truck. At trial, the occupants of the car argued that the traffic stop violated the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, because the tip was unreliable, and officers did not person

thumbnail

Property Value
dbo:abstract Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. 393 (2014), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified when police officers may make arrests or conduct temporary detentions based on information provided by anonymous tips. In 2008, police in California received a 911 call that a pickup truck was driving recklessly along a rural highway. Officers spotted a truck matching the description provided in the 911 call and followed the truck for five minutes, but did not observe any suspicious behavior. Nevertheless, officers conducted a traffic stop and discovered 30 pounds (14 kg) of marijuana in the truck. At trial, the occupants of the car argued that the traffic stop violated the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, because the tip was unreliable, and officers did not personally observe criminal activity. Writing for a majority of the Court, Justice Clarence Thomas held that the 911 call was reliable, and that officers need not personally observe criminal activity when acting upon information provided by an anonymous 911 call. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a "scathing" dissenting opinion, in which he argued that the tip was unreliable, and that the majority's opinion threatened the freedom and liberty of all citizens. Likewise, many commentators have noted Navarette represented a departure from earlier precedent, and that the opinion opened the door for expansive new police powers. Some commentators have also noted that the case leaves open several important questions, including the unanswered question of whether anonymous reports of extremely dangerous behavior require fewer indicia of reliability before police may act upon those reports. Other scholars have argued it was highly unlikely that Lorenzo and Jose Prado Navarette were actually driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol when they were stopped by police. (en)
dbo:thumbnail wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Ca-1_somewhere_between_Fort_Bragg_and_Leggett_(1).jpg?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-9490_3fb4.pdf https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/12-9490.html https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/572/12-9490/
dbo:wikiPageID 48049944 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 32567 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1004889003 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:California dbr:California_Highway_Patrol dbr:California_State_Route_1 dbr:Humboldt_County,_California dbr:John_Roberts dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_572 dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Roberts_Court dbr:California_Attorney_General dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Anonymous_tip dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbr:Lyle_Denniston dbr:State_supreme_court dbr:Close_case dbr:Aguilar–Spinelli_test dbr:Westlaw dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:Harvard_Law_Review dbr:Fort_Bragg,_California dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Dictum dbr:Reasonable_suspicion dbr:Terry_stop dbr:Associate_Justice_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_California dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Dicta dbr:Arrest dbr:Illinois_v._Gates dbr:Certiorari dbr:Probable_cause dbr:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume dbr:Totality_of_the_circumstances dbr:Marijuana dbr:United_States_Courts_of_Appeals dbr:California_Court_of_Appeal dbr:Fourth_Amendment_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Florida_v._J.L. dbr:Chief_Justice_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:File:Antonin_Scalia_Official_SCOTUS_Portrait.jpg dbr:File:Ca-1_somewhere_between_Fort_Bragg_and_Leggett_(1).JPG
dbp:arguedate 0001-01-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear 2014 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case Prado Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. 393 (en)
dbp:decidedate 0001-04-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear 2014 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent Scalia (en)
dbp:docket 12 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/12-9490.html
dbp:fullname Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette, Petitioners v. California (en)
dbp:holding When acting upon information provided by an anonymous tip, police officers need not personally verify the existence of ongoing criminal activity. (en)
dbp:joindissent Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
dbp:joinmajority Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito (en)
dbp:justia https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/572/12-9490/
dbp:lawsapplied dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:litigants Navarette v. California (en)
dbp:majority Thomas (en)
dbp:otherSource Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-9490_3fb4.pdf
dbp:parallelcitations 172800.0
dbp:prior On Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, People v. Navarette, 2012 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7415 , cert. denied People v. Navarette , 2013 Cal. LEXIS 141 (en)
dbp:uspage 393 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol 572 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Convert dbt:Good_article dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Refn dbt:Bots dbt:US4thAmendment
dcterms:subject dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law
rdf:type owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. 393 (2014), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified when police officers may make arrests or conduct temporary detentions based on information provided by anonymous tips. In 2008, police in California received a 911 call that a pickup truck was driving recklessly along a rural highway. Officers spotted a truck matching the description provided in the 911 call and followed the truck for five minutes, but did not observe any suspicious behavior. Nevertheless, officers conducted a traffic stop and discovered 30 pounds (14 kg) of marijuana in the truck. At trial, the occupants of the car argued that the traffic stop violated the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, because the tip was unreliable, and officers did not person (en)
rdfs:label Navarette v. California (en)
owl:sameAs wikidata:Navarette v. California https://global.dbpedia.org/id/21rze
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:Navarette_v._California?oldid=1004889003&ns=0
foaf:depiction wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Ca-1_somewhere_between_Fort_Bragg_and_Leggett_(1).jpg wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Antonin_Scalia_Official_SCOTUS_Portrait.jpg
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:Navarette_v._California
foaf:name (en) Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette, Petitioners v. California (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of dbr:Navarette_v_California dbr:Prado_Navarette_v._California dbr:California_v._Navarette
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:5-4 dbr:Amy_Coney_Barrett dbr:Kansas_v._Glover dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor dbr:Navarette_v_California dbr:Prado_Navarette_v._California dbr:California_v._Navarette
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:Navarette_v._California