People v. Newton (original) (raw)
People v. Newton, 8 Cal. App. 3d 359 (Ct. App. 1970), was a controversial appeal arising from the voluntary manslaughter conviction of Huey P. Newton, the reputed co-founder of the Black Panther Party for Self Defense. The California Court of Appeal reversed Newton's conviction due to prejudicial error stemming from the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to the possibility of involuntary unconsciousness as a complete defense to the charges. Though Newton's attorney arguably withdrew the defense at trial, the Court nonetheless held that the failure to instruct violated Newton's constitutional right to have the jury determine all material issues based on the evidence. This case stands for the proposition that trial courts have an affirmative duty to instruct juries as to a defense
Property | Value |
---|---|
dbo:abstract | People v. Newton, 8 Cal. App. 3d 359 (Ct. App. 1970), was a controversial appeal arising from the voluntary manslaughter conviction of Huey P. Newton, the reputed co-founder of the Black Panther Party for Self Defense. The California Court of Appeal reversed Newton's conviction due to prejudicial error stemming from the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to the possibility of involuntary unconsciousness as a complete defense to the charges. Though Newton's attorney arguably withdrew the defense at trial, the Court nonetheless held that the failure to instruct violated Newton's constitutional right to have the jury determine all material issues based on the evidence. This case stands for the proposition that trial courts have an affirmative duty to instruct juries as to a defense of involuntary unconsciousness where there exists evidence that may support that conclusion. (en) |
dbo:thumbnail | wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_Judicial_Branch_of_California.png?width=300 |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink | https://www.odmp.org/officer/reflections/5125-police-officer-john-f-frey |
dbo:wikiPageID | 34914949 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageLength | 13298 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID | 1074901080 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink | dbr:California_Supreme_Court dbr:Huey_P._Newton dbc:1970_in_California dbr:Mens_rea dbr:Grand_jury dbr:Bernard_L._Diamond dbc:Black_Panther_Party dbc:1970_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Oakland_Police_Department dbc:California_state_case_law dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Oakland_Police_Department dbr:Voluntary_manslaughter dbr:Petit_jury dbr:Alameda_County dbr:Voir_dire dbr:California_Court_of_Appeal dbr:Black_Panther_Party_for_Self_Defense |
dbp:citations | ; 87 Cal.Rptr. 394 (en) |
dbp:court | California Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4 (en) |
dbp:dateDecided | 1970-05-29 (xsd:date) |
dbp:fullName | The People v. Huey P. Newton (en) |
dbp:imagesize | 100 (xsd:integer) |
dbp:judges | Joseph A. Rattigan, Preston Devine, Winslow Christian (en) |
dbp:name | People v. Newton (en) |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | dbt:Cite_book dbt:Reflist dbt:Law_report dbt:Oakland_Police_Department dbt:Infobox_Court_Case |
dcterms:subject | dbc:1970_in_California dbc:Black_Panther_Party dbc:1970_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Oakland_Police_Department dbc:California_state_case_law |
rdf:type | yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity |
rdfs:comment | People v. Newton, 8 Cal. App. 3d 359 (Ct. App. 1970), was a controversial appeal arising from the voluntary manslaughter conviction of Huey P. Newton, the reputed co-founder of the Black Panther Party for Self Defense. The California Court of Appeal reversed Newton's conviction due to prejudicial error stemming from the trial court's failure to instruct the jury as to the possibility of involuntary unconsciousness as a complete defense to the charges. Though Newton's attorney arguably withdrew the defense at trial, the Court nonetheless held that the failure to instruct violated Newton's constitutional right to have the jury determine all material issues based on the evidence. This case stands for the proposition that trial courts have an affirmative duty to instruct juries as to a defense (en) |
rdfs:label | People v. Newton (en) |
owl:sameAs | freebase:People v. Newton wikidata:People v. Newton https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4tKsA |
prov:wasDerivedFrom | wikipedia-en:People_v._Newton?oldid=1074901080&ns=0 |
foaf:depiction | wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_Judicial_Branch_of_California.png |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | wikipedia-en:People_v._Newton |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | dbr:Huey_P._Newton dbr:Timeline_of_the_San_Francisco_Bay_Area dbr:Automatism_(law) dbr:List_of_unsolved_deaths |
is foaf:primaryTopic of | wikipedia-en:People_v._Newton |