Twitter joke trial (original) (raw)

dbo:abstract

L'affaire Paul Chambers (R v Paul Chambers, procédure en appel auprès la Haute Cour Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions[pas clair]), également connue comme le Twitter Joke Trial ("procès de la blague sur Twitter") est une décision de justice du Royaume-Uni sur la condamnation d'un homme sous le régime du pour avoir envoyé un message "menaçant" par l'intermédiaire de Twitter. La condamnation a été fréquemment dénoncée comme une erreur judiciaire. et a fait l'objet de trois appels, le troisième aboutissant finalement. (fr)
R v Paul Chambers (appealed to the High Court as Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions), popularly known as the Twitter Joke Trial, was a United Kingdom legal case centred on the conviction of a man under the Communications Act 2003 for posting a joke about destroying an airport to Twitter, a message which police regarded as "menacing". The conviction in the Magistrates' court was widely condemned as a miscarriage of justice, but was upheld on appeal to the Crown Court. Chambers appealed against the Crown Court decision to the High Court, which ultimately quashed the conviction. (en)

dbo:thumbnail

wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Twitter_Joke_Trial_1.jpg?width=300

dbo:wikiPageExternalLink

dbo:wikiPageID

30047593 (xsd:integer)

dbo:wikiPageLength

17414 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)

dbo:wikiPageRevisionID

1120535823 (xsd:integer)

dbo:wikiPageWikiLink

dbp:appealedFrom

Doncaster Magistrates' Court (en)

dbp:block

y (en)

dbp:citations

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2012/2157.html

dbp:court

dbr:High_Court_of_Justice

dbp:date

2010-01-06 (xsd:date)

dbp:dateDecided

2012-07-27 (xsd:date)

dbp:fullName

Paul Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions (en)

dbp:italicTitle

no (en)

dbp:judges

(en)
Griffith Williams J (en)
Lord Judge CJ (en)
Owen J (en)

dbp:keywords

Freedom of speech (en)
Twitter (en)
(en)
Communications Act 2003 (en)
Mens rea (en)

dbp:left

y (en)

dbp:name

Paul Chambers (en)
Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions (en)

dbp:numberOfJudges

3 (xsd:integer)

dbp:opinions

The message was not objectively menacing; the conviction was therefore quashed. (en)

dbp:text

Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You've got a week and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!! (en)

dbp:transcripts

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2012/2157.html

dbp:username

pauljchambers (en)

dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate

dct:subject

rdfs:comment

L'affaire Paul Chambers (R v Paul Chambers, procédure en appel auprès la Haute Cour Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions[pas clair]), également connue comme le Twitter Joke Trial ("procès de la blague sur Twitter") est une décision de justice du Royaume-Uni sur la condamnation d'un homme sous le régime du pour avoir envoyé un message "menaçant" par l'intermédiaire de Twitter. La condamnation a été fréquemment dénoncée comme une erreur judiciaire. et a fait l'objet de trois appels, le troisième aboutissant finalement. (fr)
R v Paul Chambers (appealed to the High Court as Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions), popularly known as the Twitter Joke Trial, was a United Kingdom legal case centred on the conviction of a man under the Communications Act 2003 for posting a joke about destroying an airport to Twitter, a message which police regarded as "menacing". The conviction in the Magistrates' court was widely condemned as a miscarriage of justice, but was upheld on appeal to the Crown Court. Chambers appealed against the Crown Court decision to the High Court, which ultimately quashed the conviction. (en)

rdfs:label

R v Paul Chambers (fr)
Twitter joke trial (en)

owl:sameAs

prov:wasDerivedFrom

wikipedia-en:Twitter_joke_trial?oldid=1120535823&ns=0

foaf:depiction

wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Twitter_Joke_Trial_1.jpg

foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf

wikipedia-en:Twitter_joke_trial

is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of

is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of

is foaf:primaryTopic of

wikipedia-en:Twitter_joke_trial