Magnesium ion-dependent triple-helix structure formed by homopurine-homopyrimidine sequences in supercoiled plasmid DNA (original) (raw)

Abstract

DNA can be chemically cleaved at the site of chloroacetaldehyde-modified residues by the chemicals used for Maxam-Gilbert sequencing reactions. Use of this technique facilitates fine structural analysis of unpaired DNA bases in DNA with non-B-DNA structure. This method was used to study the non-B-DNA structure adopted by the poly-(dG).poly(dC) sequence under torsional stress at various ionic conditions. In the presence of 2 mM Mg2+, the 5' half of the deoxycytosine tract is very reactive to chloroacetaldehyde, while the 3' half is virtually unreactive. In the poly(dG) tract, chloroacetaldehyde reaction is restricted to the center guanine residues. In the absence of Mg2+, however, it is the 5' half of the deoxyguanine tract that is reactive to chloroacetaldehyde, while the 3' half is unreactive. And chloroacetaldehyde reaction is restricted to the center cytosine residues in the poly(dC) stretch. These results strongly suggest that the poly(dG).poly(dC) sequence is folded into halves from the center of the sequence to form a tetra-stranded-like structure. Such a structure contains either a triplex consisting of poly(dG).poly(dG).poly(dC) strands in the presence of Mg2+ or a triplex consisting of poly(dC).poly(dG).poly(dC) strands in the absence of Mg2+. The fourth strand, not involved in triplex formation, is closely associated with the triplex and is positioned in such a way that DNA bases are exposed and freely accessible to the chloroacetaldehyde reaction.

3781

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrio J. R., Secrist J. A., 3rd, Leonard N. J. Fluorescent adenosine and cytidine derivatives. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972 Jan 31;46(2):597–604. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(72)80181-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boles T. C., Hogan M. E. DNA structure equilibria in the human c-myc gene. Biochemistry. 1987 Jan 27;26(2):367–376. doi: 10.1021/bi00376a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Broitman S. L., Im D. D., Fresco J. R. Formation of the triple-stranded polynucleotide helix, poly(A.A.U). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5120–5124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goding C. R., Russell W. C. S1 sensitive sites in adenovirus DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Jan 11;11(1):21–36. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hentschel C. C. Homocopolymer sequences in the spacer of a sea urchin histone gene repeat are sensitive to S1 nuclease. Nature. 1982 Feb 25;295(5851):714–716. doi: 10.1038/295714a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kimura K., Nakanishi M., Yamamoto T., Tsuboi M. A correlation between the secondary structure of DNA and the reactivity of adenine residues with chloroacetaldehyde. J Biochem. 1977 Jun;81(6):1699–1703. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a131629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kohwi-Shigematsu T., Enomoto T., Yamada M. A., Nakanishi M., Tsuboi M. Exposure of DNA bases induced by the interaction of DNA and calf thymus DNA helix-destabilizing protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Oct;75(10):4689–4693. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.10.4689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kohwi-Shigematsu T., Gelinas R., Weintraub H. Detection of an altered DNA conformation at specific sites in chromatin and supercoiled DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(14):4389–4393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kohwi-Shigematsu T., Kohwi Y. Poly(dG)-poly(dC) sequences, under torsional stress, induce an altered DNA conformation upon neighboring DNA sequences. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):199–206. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kohwi-Shigematsu T., Manes T., Kohwi Y. Unusual conformational effect exerted by Z-DNA upon its neighboring sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(8):2223–2227. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.8.2223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee J. S., Johnson D. A., Morgan A. R. Complexes formed by (pyrimidine)n . (purine)n DNAs on lowering the pH are three-stranded. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Jul 11;6(9):3073–3091. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.9.3073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lyamichev V. I., Mirkin S. M., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. A pH-dependent structural transition in the homopurine-homopyrimidine tract in superhelical DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1985 Oct;3(2):327–338. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1985.10508420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mace H. A., Pelham H. R., Travers A. A. Association of an S1 nuclease-sensitive structure with short direct repeats 5' of Drosophila heat shock genes. Nature. 1983 Aug 11;304(5926):555–557. doi: 10.1038/304555a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marck C., Thiele D., Schneider C., Guschlbauer W. Protonated polynucleotides structures - 22.CD study of the acid-base titration of poly(dG).poly(dC). Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Jun;5(6):1979–1996. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.6.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. A new method for sequencing DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Feb;74(2):560–564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.2.560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mirkin S. M., Lyamichev V. I., Drushlyak K. N., Dobrynin V. N., Filippov S. A., Frank-Kamenetskii M. D. DNA H form requires a homopurine-homopyrimidine mirror repeat. Nature. 1987 Dec 3;330(6147):495–497. doi: 10.1038/330495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Morgan A. R., Wells R. D. Specificity of the three-stranded complex formation between double-stranded DNA and single-stranded RNA containing repeating nucleotide sequences. J Mol Biol. 1968 Oct 14;37(1):63–80. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90073-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moser H. E., Dervan P. B. Sequence-specific cleavage of double helical DNA by triple helix formation. Science. 1987 Oct 30;238(4827):645–650. doi: 10.1126/science.3118463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nickol J. M., Felsenfeld G. DNA conformation at the 5' end of the chicken adult beta-globin gene. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(2 Pt 1):467–477. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90180-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pulleyblank D. E., Haniford D. B., Morgan A. R. A structural basis for S1 nuclease sensitivity of double-stranded DNA. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):271–280. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sattsangi P. D., Leonard N. J., Frihart C. R. 1,N2-ethenoguanine and N2,3-ethenoguanine. Synthesis and comparison of the electronic spectral properties of these linear and angular triheterocycles related to the Y bases. J Org Chem. 1977 Sep 30;42(20):3292–3296. doi: 10.1021/jo00440a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schon E., Evans T., Welsh J., Efstratiadis A. Conformation of promoter DNA: fine mapping of S1-hypersensitive sites. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(3 Pt 2):837–848. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90116-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shen C. K. Superhelicity induces hypersensitivity of a human polypyrimidine . polypurine DNA sequence in the human alpha 2-alpha 1 globin intergenic region to S1 nuclease digestion--high resolution mapping of the clustered cleavage sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Nov 25;11(22):7899–7910. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.22.7899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Siegfried E., Thomas G. H., Bond U. M., Elgin S. C. Characterization of a supercoil-dependent S1 sensitive site 5' to the Drosophila melanogaster hsp 26 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Dec 9;14(23):9425–9444. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.23.9425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]