Defining Clinical Leptin Resistance - Challenges and Opportunities (original) (raw)

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Feb 17.

Abstract

The lack of a universally accepted definition of the term “leptin resistance” led the National Institutes of Health to hold a workshop, “Toward a Clinical Definition of Leptin Resistance”. Leptin resistance is generally defined as the failure of endogenous or exogenous leptin to promote anticipated salutary metabolic outcomes in states of over-nutrition or obesity, although the hormone's inability to promote desired responses in specific situations results from multiple molecular, neural, behavioral, and environmental mechanisms. Thus, the term “leptin resistance” does not imply a single specific mechanism, but rather connotes distinct meanings across investigators and in different contexts. Clinically, exploiting behavioral and metabolic sensitivity to the hormone, rather than elaborating a universal, quantifiable definition of “leptin resistance”, is the goal and specific predictors of sensitivity should be established. It is clear that the availability of relevant human data is limited, however, and a substantial amount of new information must be acquired and disseminated to accomplish these goals.

Keywords: Leptin, obesity, genetic models, humans, therapy

Overview

The phrase “_leptin resistance_” arose not long after the discovery of this adipose tissue-derived hormone in late 1994 (1, 2). Found in more than 4000 citations since (Figure 1), “leptin resistance” appears to connote diverse meanings in distinct contexts and to different investigators, including obesity in the face of hyperleptinemia to the failure of pharmacologic leptin to suppress feeding (3-5). The disparate and confusing usage of the term “leptin resistance” led the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney diseases at the National Institutes of Health to hold a workshop, “Toward a Clinical Definition of Leptin Resistance,” on February 25th, 2011. The workshop goal was to explore current usage of the phrase “_leptin resistance_” and to work toward a quantifiable, clinically useful definition. This article provides background about the field, and reviews the proceedings and main themes generated at the workshop.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Number of publications per year citing “leptin resistance” since the hormone's discovery. Data from PubMed.

Leptin Biology

Leptin, a 16 kDa cytokine, is produced by adipose tissue in approximate proportion to adipose tissue mass (1, 6, 7). Thus, circulating leptin concentrations generally reflect the status of long-term adipose tissue energy stores (1, 6, 7). Leptin modulates a host of physiologic processes and behaviors in line with the need for these reserves (8, 9). For instance, adequate fat stores/leptin concentrations diminish the drive to feed, while enabling energy expenditure via a variety of neuroendocrine axes, autonomic outputs, and activities. Conversely, inadequate leptin (e.g., during caloric restriction or stable weight reduction) increases the desire to eat, decreases energy utilization, and promotes a variety of behavioral adaptations to diminished energy stores. Leptin also supports reproductive competence and immune function and contributes to the regulation of metabolic homeostasis (by modulating insulin secretion, hepatic glucose production, and lipid metabolism), as well as some aspects of bone biology (10-18). The biological effects of leptin action suggest its potential therapeutic utility in a variety of pathologic states, including obesity, diabetes, and their comorbid diseases. Indeed, leptin effectively treats the metabolic complications of lipodystrophy syndromes and restores menstruation in hypothalamic amenorrhea (19). The finding that most forms of obesity are associated with apparently diminished metabolic efficacy of leptin (“leptin resistance,” see below) has, however, complicated its potential use to treat obesity.

Mechanisms of Action

Leptin acts via its cell surface receptor (LEPR): While there exist multiple LEPR isoforms that result from alternative splicing of the Lepr mRNA, the LEPR-B form of the receptor mediates essentially all known physiologic effects of leptin (20-22). LEPR-B is a type 1 cytokine receptor that mediates intracellular signaling via an associated Janus family tyrosine kinase (Jak2) (23, 24). Major intracellular signaling pathways emanating from activated LEPR-B include the phosphorylation and activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways mediated by STAT3 and STAT5, the PTPN11→ extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) pathway, and the feedback inhibition pathway mediated by SOCS3 (24, 25). Another inhibitory pathway involves PTP1B (26). Both SOCS3 and PTP1B decrease leptin sensitivity and response in vitro and in vivo (25-29) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Potential sites/mechanisms interfering with the regulation of energy balance to produce obesity. Leptin is transported across the blood brain barrier (BBB) to access first order, LEPR-B expressing neurons, which connect with downstream neurons to eventually modulate food intake and energy expenditure. Other circuits, including those not modulated by leptin, also contribute to the control of feeding and energy expenditure. Interference (red) with any of these processes, including BBB transport of leptin, cellular processes in LEPR-B neurons (such as LEPR-B signaling), or alterations in the neural function, “wiring”, or plasticity in any of the leptin-regulated or leptin-independent circuits that contribute to energy balance are expected to promote obesity (and increase circulating leptin concentrations).

Most known leptin action is attributable to its effects in the brain, where LEPR-B is predominantly expressed (9, 30-32). Leptin action and LEPR-B expression have also been reported in a variety of tissues outside of the brain, including some cells of the immune system (33). There is little evidence to support a role for peripheral LEPR-B expression in the control of whole body energy balance or glucose homeostasis, however. CNS leptin has been shown to mediate most leptin actions, including control of neuroendocrine axes, the autonomic nervous system, satiety, and the limbic system, as well as numerous behaviors. A great deal of research in this area has focused on important neurons of the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus that express proopiomelanocortin or Agouti-related peptide, but direct leptin action on these neurons only accounts for a fraction of total leptin action, and LEPR-B is highly expressed in several other brain regions associated with the control of feeding-related behaviors and energy expenditure- including multiple hypothalamic, midbrain and brainstem nuclei (9, 34, 35).

Leptin Resistance

Definitions

The biology of leptin, as outlined above, was elucidated by studying leptin deficiency and examining the effects of leptin repletion on low-leptin states in animal models and humans. These leptin-deficient states include not only genetic leptin deficiency (very rare in humans) and caloric restriction (including anorexia), but also other conditions associated with diminished fat stores (including lipodystrophy syndromes and untreated insulin deficiency) (2, 8, 12, 36-40). Administration of exogenous leptin mitigates the increased appetite, decreased energy expenditure and neuroendocrine dysfunction associated with each of these states of leptin insufficiency. Leptin also attenuates the hyperglycemia caused by uncontrolled insulin-deficient diabetes and lipodystrophy syndromes (12, 19).

The ability of exogenous leptin to reduce food intake/body weight (and to modulate metabolism and endocrine function) in the face of replete adipose stores, especially in obese individuals, has proven to be more limited, however (41, 42). Indeed, commensurate with their large adipose mass, obese individuals exhibit elevated circulating leptin concentrations relative to lean subjects (6), and these elevated leptin concentrations (obviously) fail to return body adiposity to within the normal range. In rare instances, genetic mutations may abrogate LEPR function (here, circulating leptin is increased to concentrations well above those observed in “normal” obese humans of similar fat mass) (43). These instances are similar to classical hormone resistance/insensitivity syndromes (growth hormone insensitivity, Type A insulin resistance, etc.), in which genetic alterations of the hormone receptor prevent hormone action (44, 45).

In the vast majority of human obesity however, Lepr is unperturbed, and obesity and any diminished responsiveness to leptin must result from other mechanisms. The poor efficacy of endogenous leptin to promote leanness in obese subjects has given rise to the notion of functional “leptin resistance,” which is based loosely upon and often compared to the concept of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes - where diminished cellular and metabolic insulin responsiveness coexist with the hypersecretion of insulin (46, 47). Implicit in the concept of leptin resistance is the idea that processes that promote and/or result from obesity impair leptin action, thereby facilitating the occurrence of obesity and attenuating the potential efficacy of therapy with exogenous leptin. Understanding mechanisms that may underlie “leptin resistance” is thus crucial both for determining the causes of obesity and identifying potential mechanisms that can be targeted for therapy.

While the goal of this NIH conference was to generate a universal, quantifiable definition of leptin resistance, the common application of “leptin resistance” to label both the presence of hyperleptinemia in obesity and the failure of exogenous leptin administration to provide therapeutic benefit suggests the difficulty of identifying such a universal definition. Regarding the use of “leptin resistance” to label hyperleptinemia in obesity: Due to their increased adipose tissue mass, virtually all obese humans and animal models (except some animal strains and extraordinarily rare patients with genetic leptin deficiency) display elevated circulating leptin concentrations relative to lean controls (1, 6, 7). Additionally, processes other than those attendant to leptin action and/or LEPR-B signaling per se likely contribute to the determination of adiposity and etiology of obesity in each person- including the function and/or anatomic variation of numerous neural circuits: While some of these circuits may be directly modulated and/or developmentally programmed by leptin, many are not (47-53) (Figure 2). Furthermore, the finding that even very obese individuals exhibit changes in hunger and energy expenditure upon moderate weight loss, and that these changes are blunted by the administration of leptin, suggests that the elevated levels of leptin in obese individuals may be functionally relevant (54). Thus, defining leptin resistance as hyperleptinemia in obesity merely serves to note the elevated concentration of a single hormone whose production is expected to be increased in this condition, alterations in the action of which may or may not be primary to the genesis of obesity, and where levels of the hormone retain some physiologic relevance. Thus, we do not favor referring to the coexistence of hyperleptinemia in obesity as “leptin resistance.”

When focusing on the potential therapeutic utility of leptin, the limited ability of exogenous leptin to promote desired outcomes represents the central issue, and it is this aspect of the leptin resistance concept that we will focus on in this review. Even restricting use of “leptin resistance” to states poorly responsive to exogenous leptin, the term covers a multitude of situations, however. It refers, for example, to assays of leptin action as diverse as the induction of STAT3 phosphorylation in the brain (in animal models) and other tissues, to the attenuation of feeding and the restraint of body weight and adiposity (in either animals or humans). These may be assayed following acute or long-term treatment with leptin doses ranging from the approximately physiologic to the heroically pharmacologic. Practically speaking, therefore, “leptin resistance” is a term so broadly-applied and context-dependent that there can be no universal, quantifiable, clinically useful definition of “leptin resistance.”

Potential Mechanisms

Studies in animal models have suggested a number of basic mechanisms that may underlie attenuated responsiveness to leptin. Many of these represent processes engaged during or promoted by overnutrition and obesity, including changes in circulating leptin-binding proteins, reduced transport of leptin across the blood-brain barrier and/or the provocation of processes that diminish cellular LEPR-B signaling (inflammation, ER stress, feedback inhibition, etc.) (25-27, 29, 55-59). Alterations in the development of leptin-regulated neurons and other components of the circuitry that controls leptin action could also blunt leptin action throughout life (50). While differing in their specifics, these potential explanations for the decreased efficacy of leptin all postulate that nutritional alterations or obesity (or increased ambient leptin concentrations themselves (60, 61)) impair leptin action. Indeed, interference with many of the cellular mechanisms that attenuate LEPR-B signaling improves leptin action in cells and animal models, revealing that these mechanisms decrease leptin action in vivo, as well as suggesting the potential utility of these processes as points of therapeutic intervention (26, 28, 55, 62). Thus, while it is not possible to precisely define leptin resistance in a universal, precise, and quantifiable manner, it is clearly useful to identify and understand mechanisms that may attenuate leptin action in vivo.

The “normal” response to exogenous leptin, against which leptin resistance is often defined (especially in rodents), most often results from the attainment of circulating leptin concentrations thousands of times higher than physiological (63), and the anorectic response to these doses is modest and subject to relatively rapid tachyphylaxis. During evolution, undernutrition presumably represented a greater threat to survival than did overnutrition, with the result that the defense against starvation (low leptin) produces stronger responses than does the defense against nutritional surfeit (high leptin). A similar line of reasoning suggests that the efficacy of leptin may be near maximal at the concentrations found in most obese people at baseline, and that the addition of exogenous leptin may, therefore, raise circulating leptin concentrations without substantially increasing leptin action. While a related hypothesis suggests that obesity was also selected against by factors including the likelihood of predation (64), the ability of palatable calorically-dense diets to promote obesity in most animals and the failure of elevated leptin levels to reduce body weight in obese animals suggests that leptin may not play a major role at this end of the spectrum. The possibility that leptin action may be near its physiological maximum in states of obesity and the notion that obesity attenuates leptin action are not mutually exclusive- both mechanisms may contribute.

Clinical Issues

In human subjects, it is generally not possible to examine the molecular mechanisms associated with or underlying “leptin resistance” experimentally; rather, the state must be operationally defined as decreased responsiveness to exogenous leptin by certain criteria. As noted, however, there is no standard for the definition of human “leptin resistance.” Is leptin resistance defined by the response to a high or low dose of leptin, given once for a short time or chronically over weeks to months, in patients at baseline or following some amount of weight reduction? What is the attenuated response by which we define leptin resistance: decreased food intake, weight loss, alterations in blood glucose or lipids, hepatic triglycerides, immune function, etc.?

Since the efficacy of leptin for the control of many metabolic parameters (e.g., weight, glucose, lipids, hepatic steatosis, etc.) is likely to be of interest, leptin responsiveness must be defined in terms of the response of specific parameters, individually, to leptin treatment.

Leptin sensitivity, not defining “leptin resistance,” is what really matters

It is more practical in humans to define sensitivity rather than resistance to leptin's actions. While clinical “leptin resistance” may be captured in a general way as poor responsiveness to exogenous leptin, for the reasons outlined above, it is not possible to define clinical leptin resistance in a precise manner that can be assessed with a single, universal assay. A pragmatic approach to leptin resistance and therapeutic leptin action thus focuses not on defining clinical leptin resistance in a universal manner, but rather on assessing leptin sensitivity: Which individuals are likely to respond to leptin and/or can be sensitized to exogenous leptin? While this may seem, on the surface, to be a semantic argument, it acknowledges that there can be no universal definition of leptin resistance and that defining who we can effectively treat and the parameters of effective treatment represent the crucial issues.

How to assess leptin sensitivity effectively in the clinical setting is not currently clear. The available information suggests that, in general, leptin sensitivity is greatest in those with low adiposity and low endogenous circulating leptin in the non-weight reduced state (65). Body adiposity and leptin concentration are unlikely to represent the only predictors for leptin sensitivity, however, as each individual is likely to exhibit an idiosyncratic response to overnutrition or obesity (i.e., in terms of genetic differences or ER stress or other responses that might limit leptin action). Indeed, the sexual dimorphism in circulating leptin concentrations suggest underlying differences in leptin production and/or action by sex (6). Similarly, circulating free leptin concentrations are determined not only by leptin production, but by its clearance and by levels of circulating soluble LEPR (59). Furthermore, adiponectin and other circulating factors may predict aspects of the therapeutic efficacy of leptin (66). Thus, it will be crucial to assess and report measures of leptin responsiveness in large samples of individuals in the context of a variety of parameters that may affect leptin sensitivity (e.g., age, sex, BMI, adiposity, fat distribution, circulating levels of leptin and other factors, etc.). Also, leptin is manufactured in multiple forms, each with different pharmacodynamics parameters and potentially distinct determinants of efficacy.

In addition to the modulation of body weight and adiposity, the examination of other potentially useful outcomes of leptin therapy (e.g., glucose homeostasis, lipid metabolism, hepatic lipid content, etc.) will be important. Furthermore, as the relationship between potential measures of acute leptin action (e.g., 24-hour food intake, energy expenditure, leptin-stimulated STAT3 phosphorylation in peripheral blood monocytes, or brain imaging) and the potential therapeutic chronic effects of leptin are unclear, it would be useful to examine both acute and long-term responsiveness of individuals to determine the potential predictive value of acute studies.

Can Leptin Sensitivity be Increased?

Some investigators have suggested that pharmacologic interruption of the cellular mechanisms apparently attenuating LEPR-B signaling could increase leptin sensitivity (55). Indeed, early attempts have met with preliminary success in animal models. Furthermore, the finding that some compounds (e.g., the amylin derivative, pramlintide) augment leptin action in some individuals suggests that it may be possible to increase the sensitivity of some individuals to therapeutic leptin administration (67). Whether such a result is a consequence of the initial weight loss induced by a non-leptin drug, by direct impact of such a drug on leptin receptor signaling, or mediated by other phenomena remains unclear. Certainly however, combinatorial approaches appear to hold some promise for clinical leptin therapy. As above for responsiveness to leptin alone, it will be important to determine traits and/or acute assays and endpoints that predict the responsiveness of patients to many types of potential leptin-sensitizing therapies.

Summary

Acknowledgments

Meeting Support: This conference was supported by the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Meeting Organizers
Carol Haft
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Steven Heymsfield
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Maren Laughlin
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Martin Myers
University of Michigan
Participant List
Michael Appel
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
William Banks
VA Medical Center, St. Louis University
Olivier Blondel
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Tom Carroll
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Streamson Chua
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Alex DePaoli
InteKrin Therapeutics, Inc.
Ralph DiLeone
Yale University
James Everhart
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Judith Fradkin
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Phillip Gorden
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Carol Haft
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Joan Han
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Steven Heymsfield
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Mary Horlick
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Barbara Kahn
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School
George Kunos
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Maren Laughlin
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Rudolph Leibel
Columbia University
Barbara Linder
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Bradford Lowell
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School
David Maggs
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Saul Malozowski
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Christos Mantzoros
Harvard Medical School
Eleftheria (Terry) Maratos-Flier
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School
Heike Muenzberg-Gruening
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Martin Myers
University of Michigan
Elif Oral
University of Michigan
Umut Ozcan
Children's Hospital Boston/Harvard Medical School
Aaron Pawlyk
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Matthew Rechler
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Marc Reitman
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Michael Rosenbaum
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
Sheryl Sato
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Philipp Scherer
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Corinne Silva
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Philip Smith
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Myrlene Staten
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Yossef Tam
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Matthias Tschöp
University of Cincinnati
Allison Xu
University of California, San Francisco
Jack Yanovski
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Susan Yanovski
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Lori Zeltser
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons

Footnotes

*

a listing of meeting organizers and attendees is presented in the acknowledgement section.

Conflicts: None

References