Schizophrenia: The ‘BLOC’ May Be in the Endosomes (original) (raw)

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 21.

Published in final edited form as: Sci Signal. 2009 Oct 20;2(93):pe66. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.293pe66

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple genetic polymorphisms associated with schizophrenia. These polymorphisms conform to a polygenic disease model in which multiple alleles cumulatively increase the risk of developing disease. Two genes linked to schizophrenia, DTNBP1 and MUTED, encode proteins that belong to the endosome-localized Biogenesis of Lysosome-related Organelles Complex-1 (BLOC-1). BLOC-1 plays a key role in endosomal trafficking, and as such has been found to regulate cell surface abundance of the D2 dopamine receptor (DRD2), the biogenesis and fusion of synaptic vesicles, and neurite outgrowth. These functions are pertinent to both neurodevelopment and synaptic transmission, processes tightly regulated by selective cell surface delivery of membrane proteins to and from endosomes. We propose that cellular processes, such as endosomal trafficking, act as convergence points where multiple small effects from polygenic genetic polymorphisms pileup to trigger schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia is a devastating mental illness that can lead to the inability to live independently within our society. Genetic factors and their interactions with the environment account for 80% of the susceptibility for disease emergence [1]. The identity of these genetic factors is the subject of intense scrutiny. Recent genome-wide studies suggest that the risk of developing schizophrenia is polygenic, with multiple common allelles each contributing a small effect [2]. Such studies have identified a plethora of polymorphisms associated with the illness. Moreover, the genes identified as associated with schizophrenia have markedly diverse functions; they include genes implicated in signal transduction, growth cone guidance, pre- and post-synaptic neurotransmission, and vesicular membrane protein trafficking [2–7].

Pathogenic hypotheses for schizophrenia have tended to emphasize individual genes of “interest” [1, 8]. Broadly, these hypotheses fall into two main categories: neurochemical or neurodevelopmental [8, 9]. The neurochemical hypotheses focus on alterations in neurotransmitter systems, such as dopamine, glutamate or GABA, and are substantiated by neurotransmitter abnormalities found in the brains of affected individuals, as well as the mechanism of action for pharmacological agents used in treating or inducing schizophrenia symptoms [9, 10]. The neurodevelopmental hypotheses encompass structural alterations in the brain of schizophrenic patients that emerge early in life [9, 11]. Here, we discuss studies by several groups that focus on the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex-1 (BLOC-1) [12–14]. These studies implicate endosomal trafficking to and from the plasma membrane as a cellular mechanism that could link the neurochemical and neurodevelopmental hypotheses of schizophrenia.

Eight subunits constitute the BLOC-1 complex: dysbindin, muted, pallidin, cappuccino, snapin, BLOS1-3 [15]. This complex is present on transferrin-receptor positive endosomes, where it regulates membrane protein targeting to synaptic vesicles, lysosomes, and lysosome-related organelles [13, 16, 17]. BLOC-1 subunits are tightly bound, as evidenced by the observation that all of the dysbindin and pallidin protein in the brain copurify as a complex with the predicted molecular mass of the BLOC-1 complex [12]. Mice with genetic defects in BLOC-1 subunits further highlight the tight structural organization of BLOC-1 complex. Most null alleles of genes encoding BLOC-1 subunits lead to almost identical cell and organism phenotypes [18–21]. Among these phenotypes, the absence of any one of the BLOC-1 subunit proteins triggers the disappearance of all other BLOC-1 protein complex subunits [12, 18, 19, 22].

Two of the BLOC-1 complex subunits, dysbindin (encoded by DTNBP1) and muted (encoded by MUTED), have been associated with increased risk of schizophrenia [23, 24]. Several population genetic studies have replicated the association of DTNBP1 variants with schizophrenia [3, 8]. Importantly, dysbindin mRNA and protein abundance are decreased in the brain of schizophrenics [25, 26]. Based on these data, the hypothesis that BLOC-1 is implicated in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia leads to three predictions. First, BLOC-1-deficient mice should have neurological phenotypes consistent with the disease. Second, genetic polymorphisms in DTNBP1 associated with schizophrenia should trigger reduced levels of dysbindin in the brain of schizophrenic patients. Finally, brain tissue from schizophrenics with decreased dysbindin protein levels should also possess reduced levels in other BLOC-1 subunits, irrespective of whether these other BLOC-1 subunit genes were to carry disease-associated polymorphisms. The first prediction has been documented in dysbindin deficient mice, sandy, which display impaired social interactions and working memory both phenotypes consistent with schizophrenia [11, 27–29]. Similarly, DTNBP1 disease-associated polymorphisms decrease the levels of DTNBP1 transcripts in human cortex [30], thus supporting the second prediction. However, there is neither evidence to support the last prediction nor is there information about the developmental stage at which deficiencies in BLOC-1 function may impact the brain in schizophrenic patients.

Key observations of Ghiani et al. [12] suggest that BLOC-1 function may be required in the neonatal period, an observation consistent with the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia. First, they found that brain dysbindin and pallidin protein levels were the highest perinatally and declined in adulthood. Second, they described that loss of BLOC-1 in pallidin-null mice led to neurite outgrowth defects in primary cultured hippocampal neurons [12]. However, the effects of BLOC-1 extend beyond developmental processes. For instance, Iizuka et al. found that BLOC-1 decreases the cell-surface abundance and activity of the D2 dopamine receptor (DRD2). In neuronal cells where BLOC-1 was down-regulated by siRNA, the surface abundance of DRD2 and receptor-dependent signal transduction increased [31]. Intriguingly, DRD2, which encodes DRD2, is, like dysbindin, considered a candidate schizophrenia susceptibility gene [8]. Indeed, the D2 dopamine receptor plays a central role in the well-known dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia, which postulates that increased dopaminergic neurotransmission is causative of disease [10]. In this context, increased surface levels of DRD2 receptors in neurons induced by defective expression of BLOC-1 would favor enhanced dopaminergic neurotransmission. Furthermore, genetic polymorphisms in the DRD2 gene may potentiate this enhanced dopaminergic neurotransmission. BLOC-1-dependent endosomal trafficking mechanisms in neurons may not limited to modulation of the DRD2 receptor, instead affecting the surface levels of diverse membrane proteins and thereby altering neuronal responsiveness to extracellular cues.

Although the precise endosomal processes affected by BLOC-1 deficiency are unclear, two non-exclusive mechanisms may contribute to the increased abundance of these proteins at the cell surface. Evidence indicates that BLOC-1 regulates the sorting of selected membrane proteins into vesicles either by itself or in association with the adaptor complex AP-3 [13, 16, 32, 33]. In fact, mouse models carrying null mutations in subunits of either BLOC-1 or ubiquitous AP-3 increase the content of specific synaptic vesicle proteins, most prominently VAMP7-TI, an endosomal SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) [13]. BLOC-1 also affects membrane fusion [12, 14]. Mice lacking dysbindin, and therefore the BLOC-1 complex, have slower quantal synaptic vesicle release and lower synaptic vesicles release probability [14]. This may be related, at least in part, to the ability of BLOC-1 complexes to bind and regulate the subcellular distribution of endosomal SNAREs [12, 13, 33], membrane proteins that control the selectivity of membrane fusion along the endocytic route and between endosomal-derived organelles and the cell surface, such as synaptic vesicles [34]. Regardless, either defective biogenesis or fusion of synaptic vesicles could decrease synaptic availability of neurotransmitter, a notion consistent with the glutamatergic and GABAergic neurochemical hypotheses of schizophrenia which postulate decreased activity of these neurotransmitter systems in schizophrenia brains [10].

An attractive aspect of an endosomal hypothesis is its ability to accommodate the polygenic nature of the genetic association data. For example, one-third of the 29 genes considered top scores for increased schizophrenia susceptibility in genetic association meta-analyses are either regulated by or participate in endosomal mechanisms [3] (see Table 1). Furthermore, the products of several genes identified as contributors to the risk of developing schizophrenia in recent genome wide studies are either regulated or participate in endosomal trafficking (Table 1). Consider two gene products from table 1: VMAT1 (encoded by SLC18A)[35], which is involved in presynaptic storage of dopamine in vesicles, and DRD2 (encoded by DRD2), a postsynaptic dopamine receptor. Recognizing how polymorphisms in these two genes fit to the dopaminergic hypothesis is straightforward. However, under the umbrella of an endosomal hypothesis we can understand how the products of several of the genes in table 1 could regulate dopaminergic neurotransmission. The subcellular distribution of VMAT1 and DRD2 could be under control of proteins involved in endosomal sorting and vesiculation encoded by genes such as DTNBP1 (dysbindin), CLTCL1 (clathrin isoform-1), and CENTG2 (ARF1 GTPase activating protein-1 (AGAP1)). The clathrin isoform encoded by the CLTCL1 gene is deleted from chromosome 22 of schizophrenia patients [4]. Clathrin and clathrin adaptor complexes orchestrate the formation of vesicles from multiple compartments in cells, including endosomes [36]. AGAP1, the protein encoded by CENTG2, regulates the recruitment of AP-3 to endosomal membranes, a necessary step in the formation of vesicles from endosomes [37]. Importantly, AGAP1 directly interacts with AP-3, which in turns associates with both clathrin and BLOC-1 to form vesicles from endosomes [37, 38]. Thus, under a polygenic model of schizophrenia, disease-associated alleles in SLC18A, for example, could have small and clinically silent individual effects in either the protein levels or the function of VMAT1. Minor VMAT1 phenotypes could be further potentiated and rendered clinically significant by the compounded effect of multiple other disease-associated alleles affecting, for example, mechanisms regulating dopamine receptor surface levels. Such genes will include those genes encoding BLOC-1 subunits and other molecules involved in endosomal sorting and vesiculation, such as clathrin, AP-3 and AGAP1.

Selected supporting references are listed with capital letters in the right hand column. The following studies are included SzGene study [3], the studies that identified microdeletions in chromosomes 22 (Chr22) and 15 (Chr15) [4, 7], genome wide association studies (GWAS) conducted on the Molecular Basis of Schizophrenia Study (MGS GWAS) [5], the Stefansson’s genome wide association study [6] and the International Schizophrenia consortium genome wide association studies (ISC GWAS) [2]. A) Mol Psychiatry. 2007;12:74–86. B) J Cell Biol. 1994;127:1419–33. C) Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:413–26. D) Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;42:3–14. E) J Biol Chem. 2007;282:15778–89. F) Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24:1395–403 and Eur J Pharmacol. 2007;572:83–93. G) Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;600:1–11. H) Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005;28:335–46. I) Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:4027–38. J) Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:3181–95. K) Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:1942–51. L) J Biol Chem. 2004;279:51250–7. M) J Biol Chem. 2005;280:25769–79. N) Pflugers Arch. 2002;444:795–800. O) J Cell Biol. 2008;181:1179–93. P) J Cell Sci. 2006;119:1203–11. Q) Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:379–81. R) Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782:99–108. S) Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:683–96. T) Science. 2009;325:213–7.

GENE Study Gene Product Name Regulated by or Involved in Endosome Traffic
DISC1 SzGene Disc1 A
SLC18A1 SzGene VMAT1 B
GRIN2B SzGene NMDA receptor subtype 2B C
GABRB2 SzGene GABA A receptor, beta 2 D
DRD1 SzGene Dopamine receptor 1 E
DRD2 SzGene Dopamine receptor 2 F
DRD4 SzGene Dopamine receptor 4 Not explored
PLXNA2 SzGene Plexin A2 G
NRG1 SzGene & Stefansson GWAS Neuregulin 1 H
DTNBP1 SzGene Dysbindin I
CLTCL1 Chr 22 ISC clathrin, heavy chain-like 1 J
SEPT5 Chr 22 ISC Septin 5 K
SCARF2 Chr 22 ISC scavenger receptor F 2 L
SNAP29 Chr 22 ISC SNARE SNAP29 M
P2RXL1 Chr 22 ISC purinergic receptor P2X 6 N
CHRNA7 Chr 15 ISC cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, a7 O
CENTG2 MGS GWAS AGAP1 P
NTRK3 MGS GWAS TRKC Q
ADPR2 MGS GWAS adiponectin receptor 2 R
ERBB4 MGS GWAS Neuregulin receptor 4 S
MHC locus MGS, ISC, Stefansson GWAS MHC gene products T

Endosomal trafficking controls cell surface receptor numbers in most cell types. Trafficking qualitatively and quantitatively affects signal transduction and cell surface composition in developing and adult organisms [39]. In neurons, endosomal trafficking mechanisms define pre- and post-synaptic composition and function by controlling the biogenesis of synaptic vesicles as well as the subcellular distribution of neurotransmitter transporters and receptors [40, 41]. Focusing on endosomal trafficking builds a conceptual bridge among traditional models of schizophrenia pathogenesis. Although we have focused on the BLOC-1 complex and its role in endosomal trafficking, analysis of present and future genetic data may define other fundamental cellular machineries or processes that could contribute to disease pathogenesis. We believe that focusing on cellular mechanisms rather than isolated genes of “interest” will facilitate the formulation of hypotheses with unique predictions amenable to exploration in the genomes and brain tissue of affected individuals.

Figure 1. Putative events regulated by BLOC-1-dependent mechanisms in neurons.

Figure 1

Diagram depicts the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex (BLOC)-1 possible sites of action. BLOC-1 modulates sorting of membrane proteins and SNAREs either alone or in conjunction with AP-3 at endosomes in the cell body impacting the composition of presynaptic secretory organelles. Additionally, BLOC-1 binds and may regulate SNARE-dependent membrane fusion at the nerve terminal.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health to V.F. (NS42599) and T32 GM008367, National Institutes of Health, Training Program in Biochemistry, Cell, and Molecular Biology to P.V.R.

References