City Mayors: Richest European cities (original) (raw)
Frankfurt/Main, home to the European Central Bank, is, according to Barclays Bank, Europe's richest European city.
FRONT PAGE SiteSearch
About us
Directories
Best European business cities
EIU: Most expensive cities
Mercer: Most expensive cities
UBS: Most expensive cities
Richest cities in the world (GDP)
Richest world cities (earnings)
World's top shopping streets
Real estate Europe
Largest European cities
Business stress worldwide
Secure cities
German business cities
Top European eCities
Europe's cities of culture
Large US cities hardest hit by recession
Directories
City Mayors reports news from towns and cities around the world. Worldwide | Elections | North America | Latin America | Europe | Asia | Africa | Events |
Mayors from The Americas, Europe. Asia, Australia and Africa are competing for the annual World Mayor Award. More
City Mayors ranks the world’s largest as well as richest cities and urban areas. It also ranks the cities in individual countries, and provides a list of the capital cities of some 200 sovereign countries. More
City Mayors lists and features urban events, conferences and conventions aimed at urban decision makers and those with an interst in cities worldwide. More
City Mayors reports political events, analyses the issues and depicts the main players. More
City Mayors describes and explains the structures and workings of local government in Europe, The Americas, Asia, Australia and Africa. More
City Mayors profiles city leaders from around the world and questions them about their achievements, policies and aims. More
City Mayors deals with economic and investment issues affecting towns and cities. More
City Mayors reports on how business developments impact on cities and examines cooperation between cities and the private sector. More
City Mayors describes and explains financial issues affecting local government. More
City Mayors reports urban environmental developments and examines the challenges faced by cities worldwide. More
City Mayors reports on and discusses urban development issues in developed and developing countries. More
City Mayors reports on developments in urban society and behaviour and reviews relevant research. More
City Mayors deals with urban transport issues in developed and developing countries and features the world’s greatest metro systems. More
City Mayors examines education issues and policies affecting children and adults in urban areas. More
City Mayors investigates health issues affecting urban areas with an emphasis on health in cities in developing countries. More
City Mayors examines the contributions history and culture make to urban society and environment. More
City Mayors describes the history, architecture and politics of the greatest city halls in the world. More
City Mayors invites readers to write short stories about people in cities around the world. More
City Mayors questions those who govern the world’s cities and talks to men and women who contribute to urban society and environment. More
City Mayors profiles national and international organisations representing cities as well as those dealing with urban issues. More
City Mayors reports on major national and international sporting events and their impact on cities. More
City Mayors lists cities and city organisations, profiles individual mayors and provides information on hundreds of urban events. More
European cities outperform
their English counterparts By Nick Swift
3 February 2004: English provincial cities are lagging behind equivalent cities in mainland Europe. They perform less well and make a smaller contribution to national economic welfare than many provincial cities in Germany and other European countries,? says a study carried out by the European Institute of Urban Affairs at Liverpool John Moores University. Separate research by Britain’s Barclays Bank shows that, by GDP, Frankfurt is Europe’s richest city. The southern German city of Karlsruhe is placed second, followed by Paris in third place. London, the highest ranked UK city, is in 23rd position. Liverpool occupies last place in the Barclays Bank ranking. UBS survey 2008: Most expensive cities (Intro) | World's most expensive cities (table) | Richest cities by personal earnings (table) | Richest cities by purchasing power (table |
Mercer survey: Most expensive cities
EIU survey: Most expensive cities
RICHEST CITIES BY GDP
Introduction | 150 richest cities in 2005 | 150 richest cities in 2020 | Europe's richest cities |
The Liverpool University study was commissioned by the British Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) and supported by the Core Cities Working Group, which is a partnership of the eight English provincial cities (Birmingham, Bristol, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham, and Sheffield), the nine Regional Development Agencies, and the departments of central government primarily concerned with national economic performance, including the ODPM, the Treasury, and the Departments of Trade and Industry, Transport and Culture, Media and Sport.
Europe's 61 richest cities GDP (€) per capita in 2001
Rank | City | € per capita | Rank | City | € per capita |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Frankfurt | 74,465 | 32 | The Hague | 30,110 |
2 | Karlsruhe | 70,097 | 33 | Essen | 29,760 |
3 | Paris | 67,200 | 34 | Bristol | 29,437 |
4 | Munich | 61,360 | 35 | Lyon | 28,960 |
5 | Düsseldorf | 54,053 | 36 | Bologna | 28,282 |
6 | Stuttgart | 53,570 | 37 | Bochum | 27,900 |
7 | Brussels | 51,106 | 38 | Parma | 27,491 |
8 | Copenhagen | 50,775 | 39 | Dortmund | 26,548 |
9 | Hanover | 47,223 | 40 | Rotterdam | 26,227 |
10 | Hamburg | 43,098 | 41 | Strasbourg | 26,015 |
11 | Mannheim | 41,674 | 42 | Florence | 25,693 |
12 | Nuremburg | 41,456 | 43 | Leeds | 25,619 |
14 | Augsburg | 39,360 | 44 | Duisburg | 25,259 |
14 | Cologne | 39,108 | 45 | Eindhoven | 25,226 |
15 | Amsterdam | 38,203 | 46 | Turin | 25,042 |
16 | Münster | 38,149 | 47 | Toulouse | 24,852 |
17 | Wiesbaden | 37,454 | 48 | Rome | 24,766 |
18 | Dublin | 36,591 | 49 | Bordeaux | 24,252 |
19 | Vienna | 36,572 | 50 | Malmo | 24,233 |
20 | Stockholm | 35,733 | 51 | Gothenberg | 24,065 |
21 | Gelsenkirchen | 35,688 | 52 | Grenoble | 24,026 |
22 | Helsinki | 35,322 | 53 | Verona | 23,954 |
23 | London | 35,072 | 54 | Berlin | 23,428 |
24 | Bremen | 35,022 | 55 | Marseilles | 22,809 |
25 | Edinburgh | 35,018 | 56 | Birmingham | 22,099 |
26 | Bonn | 34,112 | 57 | Manchester | 22,069 |
27 | Antwerp | 33,090 | 58 | Newcastle | 20,499 |
28 | Milan | 32,122 | 59 | Lille | 20,191 |
29 | Glasgow | 31,893 | 60 | Barcelona | 18,449 |
30 | Utrecht | 31,712 | 61 | Liverpool | 16,466 |
31 | Saarbrücken | 30,368 | Source: | Barclays Bank |
“The Working Group’s agenda,” reads the Liverpool University report, “is to make cities drive urban renaissance and improve economic competitiveness at national and regional level. It is concerned that English provincial cities: are not punching their weight economically in the national context; are falling behind London; lack the right mix of responsibilities and resources to improve their performance; are not as competitive, or do not make as great contribution to the national economic welfare, as comparable cities in continental Europe.”
It explores “whether – and if so how and why – English provincial cities perform less well and make a smaller contribution to national economic welfare than successful provincial cities on the Continent”. It finds its basis in literature reviews, “interviews with senior policy makers throughout Europe, a postal questionnaire”, and closer study of selected cities, including fieldwork. “The full report is available from the ODPM,” it says, and “can also be read in conjunction with the earlier Core Cities report.”
A broad assertion rapidly made is that “a process of urban renaissance is taking place in England. The eight English provincial cities examined in the report have been through their worst period and are recovering economically. In some respects in recent years the cities have been performing as well as, if not better than, their regions”. Problems that remain, the report continues, include inadequate (although improving) educational attainment, a continuing high rate of number of households receiving income benefits, and other social problems. “The question is where does that recent progress leave them in comparison to the leading European cities.”
The answer is that “the eight English provincial cities do not perform well based on economic performance. Bristol and Leeds, at 34 and 43 respectively, perform best. But several are at the bottom of the list... The majority of the eight English cities have per capita GDPs less than one-third of the richest cities in Europe”.
As to the criteria employed, the “quantitative analysis first reviews the evidence on three of the key characteristics of competitiveness – innovation, connectivity and skilled workforce. Then it provides evidence about connectivity, social cohesion and the private sector’s views of the relative attractiveness of different European cities”.
German cities do extremely well, and the report relates that finding to what its authors speculate is the crucially important trend on the Continent toward decentralisation and regionalised decision making. “Continental cities have responsibility for a wider range of functions which affect their economic competitiveness than do their English counterparts. Continental cities typically have more diverse forms of local revenue and more buoyant tax bases, which make them less fiscally dependent upon the national state and more proactive in their development strategies.
“Many European cities have powerful elected mayors who give clear leadership to economic development. Many successful cities have been deeply involved in European systems and networks, which has encouraged them to be internationalist, expansionist and entrepreneurial... The more centralised governmental, institutional and financial system must be one dimension of the underperformance of English cities. The policy implication is not a short term one. But it is clear. Letting go achieves more.’
Another striking discovery is that while “there are structured characteristics of competitiveness, which are acquired over a long period of time and not lost quickly”, so that “the cities which performed well over a decade ago and were well regarded by the private sector as places to do business a decade ago, still head the league table”, the evidence also shows that “cities can change their performance... In the longer term it is also instructive to recall the experience of the three most successful non-capital cities in Europe – Frankfurt, Stuttgart and Munich.
“Fifty years ago all had been virtually destroyed. Indeed, in those cities many believe that this destruction of older industrial structures and attitudes encouraged the view in the cities that change, innovation, reinvention was both desirable and possible.”
In the UK, the report concludes, ?the spatial architecture of economic competitiveness is complex – if not confused – and unstable... There is no magic bullet. But the evidence from Europe is that increasingly the city is regarded as too small and the region too large a platform on which to base economic competitiveness. The trend is to develop city-regional solutions, most often on an informal basis, although occasionally and successfully, on a formal basis.