Issue 35704: On AIX, test_unpack_archive_xztar fails with default MAXDATA settings (original) (raw)
Issue35704
Created on 2019-01-10 09:12 by Michael.Felt, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 11500 | merged | Michael.Felt,2019-01-10 09:22 | |
| PR 11914 | merged | ncoghlan,2019-02-18 11:13 | |
| PR 14194 | closed | Michael.Felt,2019-06-18 09:19 |
| Messages (5) | ||
|---|---|---|
| msg333370 - (view) | Author: Michael Felt (Michael.Felt) * | Date: 2019-01-10 09:12 |
| By default AIX builds 32-bit applications - and the combined .data, .bss and .stack areas share one memory segment of 256 Mbyte. This can be modified by either specifying a larger value for maxdata during linking (e.g., with LDFLAGS=-bmaxdata:0x40000000) or using the program ldedit (e.g., ldedit -b maxdata:0x40000000). The subtest test_shutil.test_unpack_archive_xztar fails with the default. The patch here looks at the MAXDATA value of the executable XCOFF headers and skips the test when AIX is 32-bit and MAXDATA < 0x20000000. This helps the result of AIX bots to be more accurate - as this so-called failure is not an issue with python itself. | ||
| msg335807 - (view) | Author: miss-islington (miss-islington) | Date: 2019-02-18 11:02 |
| New changeset ef110b18074300e2302a68a2a476ae35bead7916 by Miss Islington (bot) (Michael Felt) in branch 'master': bpo-35704: Prevent test_shutil fail result when AIX is 32-bit and MAXDATA < 0x20000000 (GH-11500) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/ef110b18074300e2302a68a2a476ae35bead7916 | ||
| msg335818 - (view) | Author: miss-islington (miss-islington) | Date: 2019-02-18 11:23 |
| New changeset 02c04f26dfa637db7091b7e16036a980bbf40893 by Miss Islington (bot) (Nick Coghlan) in branch 'master': bpo-35704: Include correct NEWS entry (GH-11914) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/02c04f26dfa637db7091b7e16036a980bbf40893 | ||
| msg337627 - (view) | Author: Michael Felt (Michael.Felt) * | Date: 2019-03-10 18:25 |
| Could this also be backported to 3.7 and 3.6 please? | ||
| msg337703 - (view) | Author: Michael Felt (Michael.Felt) * | Date: 2019-03-11 21:46 |
| On 10/03/2019 19:25, Michael Felt wrote: > Michael Felt <aixtools@felt.demon.nl> added the comment: > > Could this also be backported to 3.7 and 3.6 please? Only 3.7 I guess - As 3.6 is in security mode. > > ---------- > versions: +Python 3.6, Python 3.7 > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue35704> > _______________________________________ > |
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:10 | admin | set | github: 79885 |
| 2019-09-10 13:57:40 | ned.deily | set | versions: - Python 3.7 |
| 2019-06-18 09:19:00 | Michael.Felt | set | pull_requests: + <pull%5Frequest14031> |
| 2019-03-12 07:34:44 | Michael.Felt | set | versions: - Python 3.6 |
| 2019-03-11 21:46:02 | Michael.Felt | set | messages: + |
| 2019-03-10 18:25:48 | Michael.Felt | set | messages: + versions: + Python 3.6, Python 3.7 |
| 2019-02-18 11:24:29 | ncoghlan | set | status: open -> closedresolution: fixedstage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2019-02-18 11:23:38 | miss-islington | set | messages: + |
| 2019-02-18 11:13:16 | ncoghlan | set | pull_requests: + <pull%5Frequest11941> |
| 2019-02-18 11:02:48 | miss-islington | set | nosy: + miss-islingtonmessages: + |
| 2019-01-10 09:22:59 | Michael.Felt | set | keywords: + patchstage: patch reviewpull_requests: + <pull%5Frequest11029> |
| 2019-01-10 09:12:51 | Michael.Felt | create |