Theranostic Polymeric Nanoparticles for Cancer (original) (raw)

References

1. Chakraborty, S., & Rahman, T. (2012). The difficulties in cancer treatment. Ecancermedicalscience., 6.
2. Chen, X., Gole, J., Gore, A., He, Q., Lu, M., Min, J., et al. (2020). Non-invasive early detection of cancer four years before conventional diagnosis using a blood test. Nature Communications., 11(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
3. Liston, D. R., & Davis, M. (2017). Clinically relevant concentrations of anticancer drugs: A guide for nonclinical studies guide to clinical exposures of anticancer drugs. Clinical Cancer Research., 23(14), 3489–3498.
   Article Google Scholar
4. Meng, Q., & Li, Z. (2013). Molecular imaging probes for diagnosis and therapy evaluation of breast cancer. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2013.
5. Li, C., Liu, C., Fan, Y., Ma, X., Zhan, Y., Lu, X., et al. (2021). Recent development of near-infrared photoacoustic probes based on small-molecule organic dye. RSC Chemical Biology, 2(3), 743–758.
   Article Google Scholar
6. Narvekar, M., Xue, H. Y., Eoh, J. Y., & Wong, H. L. (2014). Nanocarrier for poorly water-soluble anticancer drugs—barriers of translation and solutions. Aaps Pharmscitech, 15(4), 822–833.
   Article Google Scholar
7. Janib, S. M., Moses, A. S., & MacKay, J. A. (2010). Imaging and drug delivery using theranostic nanoparticles. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 62(11), 1052–1063.
   Article Google Scholar
8. Patra, J. K., Das, G., Fraceto, L. F., Campos, E. V. R., Rodriguez-Torres, M. P., Acosta-Torres, L. S., et al. (2018). Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 16(1), 1–33.
   Article Google Scholar
9. Siafaka, P. I., Okur, N. Ü., Karantas, I. D., Okur, M. E., & Gündoğdu, E. A. (2021). Current update on nanoplatforms as therapeutic and diagnostic tools: A review for the materials used as nanotheranostics and imaging modalities. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 16(1), 24–46.
   Article Google Scholar
10. Maeda, H. (2013). The link between infection and cancer: Tumor vasculature, free radicals, and drug delivery to tumors via the EPR effect. Cancer Science, 104(7), 779–789.
    Article Google Scholar
11. Wilhelm, S., Tavares, A. J., Dai, Q., Ohta, S., Audet, J., Dvorak, H. F., et al. (2016). Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nature Reviews Materials, 1(5), 1–12.
    Article Google Scholar
12. Finbloom, J. A., Sousa, F., Stevens, M. M., & Desai, T. A. (2020). Engineering the drug carrier biointerface to overcome biological barriers to drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 167, 89–108.
    Article Google Scholar
13. Cooley, M., Sarode, A., Hoore, M., Fedosov, D. A., Mitragotri, S., & Gupta, A. S. (2018). Influence of particle size and shape on their margination and wall-adhesion: implications in drug delivery vehicle design across nano-to-micro scale. Nanoscale, 10(32), 15350–15364.
    Article Google Scholar
14. Yu, E., Sancenón, F., Aznar, E., Martínez-Máñez, R., Marcos, M. D., Hajipour, M. J., et al. (2017). Future perspective on the smart delivery of biomolecules. Drug Delivery Systems, 1, 363.
    Article Google Scholar
15. Jain, R. K., & Stylianopoulos, T. (2010). Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 7(11), 653–664.
    Article Google Scholar
16. Hashizume, H., Baluk, P., Morikawa, S., McLean, J. W., Thurston, G., Roberge, S., et al. (2000). Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness. The American Journal of Pathology, 156(4), 1363–1380.
    Article Google Scholar
17. Kulkarni, S. A., & Feng, S.-S. (2013). Effects of particle size and surface modification on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery. Pharmaceutical Research, 30(10), 2512–2522.
    Article Google Scholar
18. Faraji, A. H., & Wipf, P. (2009). Nanoparticles in cellular drug delivery. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 17(8), 2950–2962.
    Article Google Scholar
19. Zhong, Q., Merkel, O. M., Reineke, J. J., & da Rocha, S. R. (2016). Effect of the route of administration and PEGylation of poly (amidoamine) dendrimers on their systemic and lung cellular biodistribution. Molecular Pharmaceutics, 13(6), 1866–1878.
    Article Google Scholar
20. Battaglia, L., Panciani, P. P., Muntoni, E., Capucchio, M. T., Biasibetti, E., De Bonis, P., et al. (2018). Lipid nanoparticles for intranasal administration: application to nose-to-brain delivery. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 15(4), 369–378.
    Article Google Scholar
21. Bazak, R., Houri, M., El Achy, S., Kamel, S., & Refaat, T. (2015). Cancer active targeting by nanoparticles: a comprehensive review of literature. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 141(5), 769–784.
    Article Google Scholar
22. Nag, O. K., & Delehanty, J. B. (2019). Active cellular and subcellular targeting of nanoparticles for drug delivery. Pharmaceutics, 11(10), 543.
    Article Google Scholar
23. Hoshyar, N., Gray, S., Han, H., & Bao, G. (2016). The effect of nanoparticle size on in vivo pharmacokinetics and cellular interaction. Nanomedicine, 11(6), 673–692.
    Article Google Scholar
24. Kou, L., Bhutia, Y. D., Yao, Q., He, Z., Sun, J., & Ganapathy, V. (2018). Transporter-guided delivery of nanoparticles to improve drug permeation across cellular barriers and drug exposure to selective cell types. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 27.
    Article Google Scholar
25. Boedtkjer, E., & Pedersen, S. F. (2020). The acidic tumor microenvironment as a driver of cancer. Annual Review of Physiology, 82, 103–126.
    Article Google Scholar
26. Wu, W., Luo, L., Wang, Y., Wu, Q., Dai, H.-B., Li, J.-S., et al. (2018). Endogenous pH-responsive nanoparticles with programmable size changes for targeted tumor therapy and imaging applications. Theranostics, 8(11), 3038.
    Article Google Scholar
27. Li, M., Zhao, G., Su, W.-K., & Shuai, Q. (2020). Enzyme-responsive nanoparticles for anti-tumor drug delivery. Frontiers in Chemistry, 8, 647.
    Article Google Scholar
28. Ferretti, S., Allegrini, P. R., Becquet, M. M., & McSheehy, P. M. (2009). Tumor interstitial fluid pressure as an early-response marker for anticancer therapeutics. Neoplasia, 11(9), 874–881.
    Article Google Scholar
29. Blanco, E., Shen, H., & Ferrari, M. (2015). Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nature Biotechnology, 33(9), 941–951.
    Article Google Scholar
30. Li, M., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., & Li, J. (2022). Tumor extracellular matrix modulating strategies for enhanced antitumor therapy of nanomedicines. Materials Today Bio, 100364.
31. Siemann, D. W. (2011). The unique characteristics of tumor vasculature and preclinical evidence for its selective disruption by tumor-vascular disrupting agents. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 37(1), 63–74.
    Article Google Scholar
32. Kalyane, D., Raval, N., Maheshwari, R., Tambe, V., Kalia, K., & Tekade, R. K. (2019). Employment of enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR): Nanoparticle-based precision tools for targeting of therapeutic and diagnostic agent in cancer. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 98, 1252–1276.
    Article Google Scholar
33. Wu, S., Zhu, W., Thompson, P., & Hannun, Y. A. (2018). Evaluating intrinsic and non-intrinsic cancer risk factors. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1–12.
    Google Scholar
34. Anand, P., Kunnumakara, A. B., Sundaram, C., Harikumar, K. B., Tharakan, S. T., Lai, O. S., et al. (2008). Cancer is a preventable disease that requires major lifestyle changes. Pharmaceutical Research, 25(9), 2097–2116.
    Article Google Scholar
35. Ensign, L. M., Cone, R., & Hanes, J. (2012). Oral drug delivery with polymeric nanoparticles: The gastrointestinal mucus barriers. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64(6), 557–570.
    Article Google Scholar
36. Witten, J., & Ribbeck, K. (2017). The particle in the spider's web: Transport through biological hydrogels. Nanoscale, 9(24), 8080–8095.
    Article Google Scholar
37. Neagu, M., Piperigkou, Z., Karamanou, K., Engin, A. B., Docea, A. O., Constantin, C., et al. (2017). Protein bio-corona: critical issue in immune nanotoxicology. Archives of Toxicology, 91(3), 1031–1048.
    Article Google Scholar
38. Trimble, W. S., & Grinstein, S. (2015). Barriers to the free diffusion of proteins and lipids in the plasma membrane. Journal of Cell Biology, 208(3), 259–271.
    Article Google Scholar
39. Mulhall, H. J., Hughes, M. P., Kazmi, B., Lewis, M. P., & Labeed, F. H. (2013). Epithelial cancer cells exhibit different electrical properties when cultured in 2D and 3D environments. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects, 1830(11), 5136–5141.
    Article Google Scholar
40. Chen, B., Le, W., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Wang, D., Ren, L., et al. (2016). Targeting negative surface charges of cancer cells by multifunctional nanoprobes. Theranostics, 6(11), 1887.
    Article Google Scholar
41. Augustine, R., Hasan, A., Primavera, R., Wilson, R. J., Thakor, A. S., & Kevadiya, B. D. (2020). Cellular uptake and retention of nanoparticles: Insights on particle properties and interaction with cellular components. Materials Today Communications, 25, 101692.
    Article Google Scholar
42. Sahay, G., Alakhova, D. Y., & Kabanov, A. V. (2010). Endocytosis of nanomedicines. Journal of Controlled Release, 145(3), 182–195.
    Article Google Scholar
43. Pelkmans, L., & Helenius, A. (2002). Endocytosis via caveolae. Traffic, 3(5), 311–320.
    Article Google Scholar
44. Kirkham, M., Parton, R. G., et al. (2005). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Cell Research, 1745(3), 273–286.
    Article Google Scholar
45. Rennick, J. J., Johnston, A. P., & Parton, R. G. (2021). Key principles and methods for studying the endocytosis of biological and nanoparticle therapeutics. Nature Nanotechnology, 16(3), 266–276.
    Article Google Scholar
46. Means, N., Elechalawar, C. K., Chen, W. R., Bhattacharya, R., & Mukherjee, P. (2021). Revealing macropinocytosis using nanoparticles. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 100993.
47. Liu, C.-G., Han, Y.-H., Kankala, R. K., Wang, S.-B., & Chen, A.-Z. (2020). Subcellular performance of nanoparticles in cancer therapy. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 15, 675.
    Article Google Scholar
48. Vaughan, H. J., Green, J. J., & Tzeng, S. Y. (2020). Cancer-targeting nanoparticles for combinatorial nucleic acid delivery. Advanced Materials, 32(13), 1901081.
    Article Google Scholar
49. Jin, Y., Zakeri, S. E., Bahal, R., & Wiemer, A. J. (2022). New technologies bloom together for bettering cancer drug conjugates. Pharmacological Reviews, 74(3), 680–711.
    Article Google Scholar
50. Ughachukwu P, Unekwe P. Efflux Pump. Mediated Resistance in Chemotherapy. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 2(2):191-198.
51. Perumal, V., Sivakumar, P. M., Zarrabi, A., Muthupandian, S., Vijayaraghavalu, S., Sahoo, K., et al. (2019). Near infra-red polymeric nanoparticle based optical imaging in Cancer diagnosis. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 199, 111630.
    Article Google Scholar
52. Bu, L., Ma, X., Tu, Y., Shen, B., & Cheng, Z. (2013). Optical image-guided cancer therapy. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 14(8), 723–732.
    Article Google Scholar
53. Mi, P. (2020). Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery, tumor imaging, therapy and theranostics. Theranostics, 10(10), 4557.
    Article Google Scholar
54. Reisch, A., & Klymchenko, A. S. (2016). Fluorescent polymer nanoparticles based on dyes: seeking brighter tools for bioimaging. Small, 12(15), 1968–1992.
    Article Google Scholar
55. Yang, Y., Tu, D., Zhang, Y., Zhang, P., & Chen, X. (2021). Recent advances in design of lanthanide-containing NIR-II luminescent nanoprobes. Iscience, 24(2), 102062.
    Article Google Scholar
56. Wu, Z., Midgley, A. C., Kong, D., & Ding, D. (2022). Organic persistent luminescence imaging for biomedical applications. Materials Today Bio, 100481.
57. Yusefi, H., & Helfield, B. (2022). Ultrasound contrast imaging: Fundamentals and emerging technology. Frontiers in Physics, 100.
58. Duan, L., Yang, L., Jin, J., Yang, F., Liu, D., Hu, K., et al. (2020). Micro/nano-bubble-assisted ultrasound to enhance the EPR effect and potential theranostic applications. Theranostics, 10(2), 462.
    Article Google Scholar
59. Fu, L., & Ke, H.-T. (2016). Nanomaterials incorporated ultrasound contrast agents for cancer theranostics. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 13(3), 313.
    Article Google Scholar
60. Weber, J., Beard, P. C., & Bohndiek, S. E. (2016). Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging. Nature Methods, 13(8), 639–650.
    Article Google Scholar
61. Upputuri, P. K., & Pramanik, M. (2020). Recent advances in photoacoustic contrast agents for in vivo imaging. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 12(4), e1618.
    Google Scholar
62. Weishaupt, D., Köchli, V. D., Marincek, B., Froehlich, J. M., Nanz, D., & Pruessmann, K. P. (2006). How does MRI work?: an introduction to the physics and function of magnetic resonance imaging. Springer.
    Google Scholar
63. Grover, V. P., Tognarelli, J. M., Crossey, M. M., Cox, I. J., Taylor-Robinson, S. D., & McPhail, M. J. (2015). Magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques: lessons for clinicians. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology, 5(3), 246–255.
    Article Google Scholar
64. Gauger, A. J., Hershberger, K. K., & Bronstein, L. M. (2020). Theranostics based on magnetic nanoparticles and polymers: intelligent design for efficient diagnostics and therapy. Frontiers in Chemistry, 8, 561.
    Article Google Scholar
65. Brito, B., Price, T. W., Gallo, J., Bañobre-López, M., & Stasiuk, G. J. (2021). Smart magnetic resonance imaging-based theranostics for cancer. Theranostics, 11(18), 8706.
    Article Google Scholar
66. Nyström, A. M. (2012). Update on Polymer Based Nanomedicine. Smithers Rapra.
    Google Scholar
67. Cormode, D. P., Naha, P. C., & Fayad, Z. A. (2014). Nanoparticle contrast agents for computed tomography: a focus on micelles. Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging, 9(1), 37–52.
    Article Google Scholar
68. Lusic, H., & Grinstaff, M. W. (2013). X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents. Chemical Reviews, 113(3), 1641–1666.
    Article Google Scholar
69. Livieratos, L. (2012). Basic principles of SPECT and PET imaging. radionuclide and hybrid bone. Imaging, 345–359.
70. Unterrainer, M., Eze, C., Ilhan, H., Marschner, S., Roengvoraphoj, O., Schmidt-Hegemann, N.-S., et al. (2020). Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology. Radiation Oncology, 15(1), 1–15.
    Article Google Scholar
71. Crișan, G., Moldovean-Cioroianu, N. S., Timaru, D.-G., Andrieș, G., Căinap, C., & Chiș, V. (2022). Radiopharmaceuticals for PET and SPECT imaging: A literature review over the last decade. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(9), 5023.
    Article Google Scholar
72. Wu, S., Helal-Neto, E., Matos, A. P. S., Jafari, A., Kozempel, J., Silva, Y. J. A., et al. (2020). Radioactive polymeric nanoparticles for biomedical application. Drug Delivery, 27(1), 1544–1561.
    Article Google Scholar
73. Parveen, S., & Sahoo, S. K. (2008). Polymeric nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Journal of Drug Targeting, 16(2), 108–123.
    Article Google Scholar
74. Letchford, K., & Burt, H. (2007). A review of the formation and classification of amphiphilic block copolymer nanoparticulate structures: micelles, nanospheres, nanocapsules and polymersomes. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 65(3), 259–269.
    Article Google Scholar
75. Elsabahy, M., Heo, G. S., Lim, S.-M., Sun, G., & Wooley, K. L. (2015). Polymeric nanostructures for imaging and therapy. Chemical Reviews, 115(19), 10967–11011.
    Article Google Scholar
76. Zhang, X., Liang, T., & Ma, Q. (2021). Layer-by-Layer assembled nano-drug delivery systems for cancer treatment. Drug Delivery, 28(1), 655–669.
    Article Google Scholar
77. Lima, A. L., Gratieri, T., Cunha-Filho, M., & Gelfuso, G. M. (2022). Polymeric nanocapsules: A review on design and production methods for pharmaceutical purpose. Methods, 199, 54–66.
    Article Google Scholar
78. Das, R., Kumar, H., Choithramani, A., Bothra, G., & Shard, A. (2022). Polymeric nanoparticles to entrap natural drugs for cancer therapy. Polymeric Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Solid Tumors, 167–211.
79. Behzadi, S., Serpooshan, V., Tao, W., Hamaly, M. A., Alkawareek, M. Y., Dreaden, E. C., et al. (2017). Cellular uptake of nanoparticles: journey inside the cell. Chemical Society Reviews, 46(14), 4218–4244.
    Article Google Scholar
80. Mendoza-Muñoz, N., Alcalá-Alcala, S., & Quintanar-Guerrero, D. (2016). preparation of polymer nanoparticles by the emulsification-solvent evaporation method: From Vanderhoff’s pioneer approach to recent adaptations. Polymer Nanoparticles for Nanomedicines: A guide for their design. Preparation and Development, 87–121.
81. Yan, X., Bernard, J., & Ganachaud, F. (2021). Nanoprecipitation as a simple and straightforward process to create complex polymeric colloidal morphologies. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 294, 102474.
    Article Google Scholar
82. Tao, J., Chow, S. F., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Application of flash nanoprecipitation to fabricate poorly water-soluble drug nanoparticles. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 9(1), 4–18.
    Article Google Scholar
83. Rao, J. P., & Geckeler, K. E. (2011). Polymer nanoparticles: Preparation techniques and size-control parameters. Progress in Polymer Science, 36(7), 887–913.
    Article Google Scholar
84. Wang, Y., Byrne, J. D., Napier, M. E., & DeSimone, J. M. (2012). Engineering nanomedicines using stimuli-responsive biomaterials. >Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64(11), 1021–1030.
    Article Google Scholar
85. Upponi, J. R., Jerajani, K., Nagesha, D. K., Kulkarni, P., Sridhar, S., Ferris, C., et al. (2018). Polymeric micelles: theranostic co-delivery system for poorly water-soluble drugs and contrast agents. Biomaterials, 170, 26–36.
    Article Google Scholar
86. Ghezzi, M., Pescina, S., Padula, C., Santi, P., Del Favero, E., Cantù, L., et al. (2021). Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions. Journal of Controlled Release, 332, 312–336.
    Article Google Scholar
87. Letchford, K., Zastre, J., Liggins, R., & Burt, H. (2004). Synthesis and micellar characterization of short block length methoxy poly (ethylene glycol)-block-poly (caprolactone) diblock copolymers. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 35(2), 81–91.
    Article Google Scholar
88. Hibino, M., Tanaka, K., Ouchi, M., & Terashima, T. (2021). Amphiphilic random-block copolymer micelles in water: Precise and dynamic self-assembly controlled by random copolymer association. Macromolecules, 55(1), 178–189.
    Article Google Scholar
89. Schoubben, A., Ricci, M., & Giovagnoli, S. (2019). Meeting the unmet: From traditional to cutting-edge techniques for poly lactide and poly lactide-co-glycolide microparticle manufacturing. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 49, 381–404.
    Article Google Scholar
90. Torchilin, V. P. (2001). Structure and design of polymeric surfactant-based drug delivery systems. Journal of Controlled Release, 73(2-3), 137–172.
    Article Google Scholar
91. Fournier, E., Dufresne, M.-H., Smith, D. C., Ranger, M., & Leroux, J.-C. (2004). A novel one-step drug-loading procedure for water-soluble amphiphilic nanocarriers. Pharmaceutical Research, 21, 962–968.
    Article Google Scholar
92. Tyrrell, Z. L., Shen, Y., & Radosz, M. (2010). Fabrication of micellar nanoparticles for drug delivery through the self-assembly of block copolymers. Progress in Polymer Science, 35(9), 1128–1143.
    Article Google Scholar
93. Gaucher, G., Dufresne, M.-H., Sant, V. P., Kang, N., Maysinger, D., & Leroux, J.-C. (2005). Block copolymer micelles: preparation, characterization and application in drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release, 109(1-3), 169–188.
    Article Google Scholar
94. Tomalia, D. A., Christensen, J. B., & Boas, U. (2012). Dendrimers, dendrons, and dendritic polymers: discovery, applications, and the future. Cambridge University Press.
    Book Google Scholar
95. Abbasi, E., Aval, S. F., Akbarzadeh, A., Milani, M., Nasrabadi, H. T., Joo, S. W., et al. (2014). Dendrimers: synthesis, applications, and properties. Nanoscale Research Letters, 9(1), 1–10.
    Article Google Scholar
96. Saluja, V., Mishra, Y., Mishra, V., Giri, N., & Nayak, P. (2021). Dendrimers based cancer nanotheranostics: An overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 600, 120485.
    Article Google Scholar
97. Noriega-Luna B, Godínez LA, Rodríguez FJ, Rodríguez A, Larrea GZ-Ld, Sosa-Ferreyra C, et al. (2014). Applications of dendrimers in drug delivery agents, diagnosis, therapy, and detection. Journal of Nanomaterials 2014, 39-.
98. Medina, S. H., & El-Sayed, M. E. (2009). Dendrimers as carriers for delivery of chemotherapeutic agents. Chemical Reviews, 109(7), 3141–3157.
    Article Google Scholar
99. Maiti, P. K., Çaǧın, T., Wang, G., & Goddard, W. A. (2004). Structure of PAMAM dendrimers: Generations 1 through 11. Macromolecules, 37(16), 6236–6254.
    Article Google Scholar
100. Mohammadi, M., Ramezani, M., Abnous, K., & Alibolandi, M. (2017). Biocompatible polymersomes-based cancer theranostics: Towards multifunctional nanomedicine. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 519(1-2), 287–303.
     Article Google Scholar
101. Liu, G.-Y., Chen, C.-J., & Ji, J. (2012). Biocompatible and biodegradable polymersomes as delivery vehicles in biomedical applications. Soft Matter, 8(34), 8811–8821.
     Article Google Scholar
102. Simone, E. A., Dziubla, T. D., & Muzykantov, V. R. (2008). Polymeric carriers: role of geometry in drug delivery. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 5(12), 1283–1300.
     Article Google Scholar
103. Rideau, E., Dimova, R., Schwille, P., Wurm, F. R., & Landfester, K. (2018). Liposomes and polymersomes: a comparative review towards cell mimicking. Chemical Society Reviews, 47(23), 8572–8610.
     Article Google Scholar
104. Robertson, J. D., Rizzello, L., Avila-Olias, M., Gaitzsch, J., Contini, C., Magoń, M. S., et al. (2016). Purification of nanoparticles by size and shape. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1–9.
     Article Google Scholar
105. O’Neil, C. P., Suzuki, T., Demurtas, D., Finka, A., & Hubbell, J. A. (2009). A novel method for the encapsulation of biomolecules into polymersomes via direct hydration. Langmuir, 25(16), 9025–9029.
     Article Google Scholar
106. Lo, C. H., & Zeng, J. (2023). Application of polymersomes in membrane protein study and drug discovery: Progress, strategies, and perspectives. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine, 8(1), e10350.
     Article Google Scholar
107. Lefley, J., Waldron, C., & Becer, C. R. (2020). Macromolecular design and preparation of polymersomes. Polymer Chemistry, 11(45), 7124–7136.
     Article Google Scholar
108. Durymanov, M., & Reineke, J. (2018). Non-viral delivery of nucleic acids: Insight into mechanisms of overcoming intracellular barriers. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 971.
     Article Google Scholar
109. Vetter, V. C., & Wagner, E. (2022). Targeting nucleic acid-based therapeutics to tumors: Challenges and strategies for polyplexes. Journal of Controlled Release, 346, 110–135.
     Article Google Scholar
110. Shim, M. S., & Kwon, Y. J. (2012). Stimuli-responsive polymers and nanomaterials for gene delivery and imaging applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64(11), 1046–1059.
     Article Google Scholar
111. Zhang, R., Qin, X., Kong, F., Chen, P., & Pan, G. (2019). Improving cellular uptake of therapeutic entities through interaction with components of cell membrane. Drug Delivery, 26(1), 328–342.
     Article Google Scholar
112. Shah, S., Famta, P., Raghuvanshi, R. S., Singh, S. B., & Srivastava, S. (2022). Lipid polymer hybrid nanocarriers: Insights into synthesis aspects, characterization, release mechanisms, surface functionalization and potential implications. Colloid and Interface Science Communications, 46, 100570.
     Article Google Scholar
113. Teixeira, M., Carbone, C., & Souto, E. (2017). Beyond liposomes: Recent advances on lipid based nanostructures for poorly soluble/poorly permeable drug delivery. Progress in Lipid Research, 68, 1–11.
     Article Google Scholar
114. Raffa, P., Wever, D. A. Z., Picchioni, F., & Broekhuis, A. A. (2015). Polymeric surfactants: synthesis, properties, and links to applications. Chemical Reviews., 115(16), 8504–8563.
     Article Google Scholar
115. Nasef, A. M., Gardouh, A. R., & Ghorab, M. M. (2015). Polymeric nanoparticles: influence of polymer, surfactant and composition of manufacturing vehicle on particle size. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2308–2322.
116. Karthic, A., Roy, A., Lakkakula, J., Alghamdi, S., Shakoori, A., Babalghith, A. O., et al. (2022). Cyclodextrin nanoparticles for diagnosis and potential cancer therapy: A systematic review. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology., 10.
117. Gadade, D. D., Rathi, P. B., Sangshetti, J. N., & Kulkarni, D. A. (2022). Multifunctional cyclodextrin nanoparticles: A promising theranostic tool for strategic targeting of cancer. Polysaccharide Nanoparticles. Elsevier, 485–515.
118. Wang, Y., Xia, H., Chen, B., & Wang, Y. (2023). Rethinking nanoparticulate polymer–drug conjugates for cancer theranostics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 15(1), e1828.
     Google Scholar
119. Duncan, R., Vicent, M., Greco, F., & Nicholson, R. (2005). Polymer-drug conjugates: towards a novel approach for the treatment of endrocine-related cancer. Endocrine Related Cancer, 12(1), S189.
     Article Google Scholar
120. Grillo, R., Gallo, J., Stroppa, D. G., Carbó-Argibay, E., Lima, R., Fraceto, L. F., et al. (2016). Sub-micrometer magnetic nanocomposites: insights into the effect of magnetic nanoparticles interactions on the optimization of SAR and MRI performance. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 8(39), 25777–25787.
     Article Google Scholar
121. Wu, M., Zhong, C., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Wang, L., Liu, Y., et al. (2021). pH-responsive delivery vehicle based on RGD-modified polydopamine-paclitaxel-loaded poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) nanoparticles for targeted therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 19(1), 1–17.
     Article Google Scholar
122. Hu, D., Chen, L., Qu, Y., Peng, J., Chu, B., Shi, K., et al. (2018). Oxygen-generating hybrid polymeric nanoparticles with encapsulated doxorubicin and chlorin e6 for trimodal imaging-guided combined chemo-photodynamic therapy. Theranostics, 8(6), 1558.
     Article Google Scholar
123. Jaidev, L., Krishnan, U. M., & Sethuraman, S. (2015). Gemcitabine loaded biodegradable PLGA nanospheres for in vitro pancreatic cancer therapy. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 47, 40–47.
     Article Google Scholar
124. Brandhonneur, N., Hatahet, T., Amela-Cortes, M., Molard, Y., Cordier, S., & Dollo, G. (2018). Molybdenum cluster loaded PLGA nanoparticles: An innovative theranostic approach for the treatment of ovarian cancer. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 125, 95–105.
     Article Google Scholar
125. Li, L., Xiang, D., Shigdar, S., Yang, W., Li, Q., Lin, J., et al. (2014). Epithelial cell adhesion molecule aptamer functionalized PLGA-lecithin-curcumin-PEG nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery to human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 9, 1083.
     Google Scholar
126. Keil, T. W., Feldmann, D. P., Costabile, G., Zhong, Q., da Rocha, S., & Merkel, O. M. (2019). Characterization of spray dried powders with nucleic acid-containing PEI nanoparticles. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 143, 61–69.
     Article Google Scholar
127. Anzar, N., Mirza, M. A., Anwer, K., Khuroo, T., Alshetaili, A. S., Alshahrani, S. M., et al. (2018). Preparation, evaluation and pharmacokinetic studies of spray dried PLGA polymeric submicron particles of simvastatin for the effective treatment of breast cancer. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 249, 609–616.
     Article Google Scholar
128. Kucharczyk, K., Rybka, J. D., Hilgendorff, M., Krupinski, M., Slachcinski, M., Mackiewicz, A., et al. (2019). Composite spheres made of bioengineered spider silk and iron oxide nanoparticles for theranostics applications. PLoS One, 14(7), e0219790.
     Article Google Scholar
129. Song, X. R., Cai, Z., Zheng, Y., He, G., Cui, F. Y., Gong, D. Q., et al. (2009). Reversion of multidrug resistance by co-encapsulation of vincristine and verapamil in PLGA nanoparticles. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 37(3-4), 300–305.
     Article Google Scholar
130. Xu, X., Koivisto, O., Liu, C., Zhou, J., Miihkinen, M., Jacquemet, G., et al. (2021). Effective delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system enabled by functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for GFP-tagged Paxillin knock-in. Advanced Therapeutics, 4(1), 2000072.
     Article Google Scholar
131. Tammaro, O., Costagliola di Polidoro, A., Romano, E., Netti, P. A., & Torino, E. (2020). A microfluidic platform to design multimodal PEG-crosslinked hyaluronic acid nanoparticles (PEG-cHANPs) for diagnostic applications. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–11.
     Google Scholar
132. Chu, K. S., Hasan, W., Rawal, S., Walsh, M. D., Enlow, E. M., Luft, J. C., et al. (2013). Plasma, tumor and tissue pharmacokinetics of Docetaxel delivered via nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes in mice bearing SKOV-3 human ovarian carcinoma xenograft. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 9(5), 686–693.
     Article Google Scholar
133. Hasan, W., Chu, K., Gullapalli, A., Dunn, S. S., Enlow, E. M., Luft, J. C., et al. (2012). Delivery of multiple siRNAs using lipid-coated PLGA nanoparticles for treatment of prostate cancer. Nano Letters, 12(1), 287–292.
     Article Google Scholar
134. Chatterjee, M., Jaiswal, N., Hens, A., Mahata, N., & Chanda, N. (2020). Development of 6-Thioguanine conjugated PLGA nanoparticles through thioester bond formation: Benefits of electrospray mediated drug encapsulation and sustained release in cancer therapeutic applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 114, 111029.
     Article Google Scholar
135. Rasekh, M., Ahmad, Z., Cross, R., Hernández-Gil, J., Wilton-Ely, J. D., & Miller, P. W. (2017). Facile preparation of drug-loaded tristearin encapsulated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles using coaxial electrospray processing. Molecular Pharmaceutics, 14(6), 2010–2023.
     Article Google Scholar
136. Doane, T., & Burda, C. (2013). Nanoparticle mediated non-covalent drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 65(5), 607–621.
     Article Google Scholar
137. Jain, A., & Cheng, K. (2017). The principles and applications of avidin-based nanoparticles in drug delivery and diagnosis. Journal of Controlled Release, 245, 27–40.
     Article Google Scholar
138. Sivaram, A. J., Wardiana, A., Howard, C. B., Mahler, S. M., & Thurecht, K. J. (2018). Recent advances in the generation of antibody–nanomaterial conjugates. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 7(1), 1700607.
     Article Google Scholar
139. Chen, E. Y., Liu, W. F., Megido, L., Díez, P., Fuentes, M., Fager, C., et al. (2018). Understanding and utilizing the biomolecule/nanosystems interface. Nanotechnologies in Preventive and Regenerative Medicine. Elsevier, 207–297.
140. Martínez-Jothar, L., Doulkeridou, S., Schiffelers, R. M., Torano, J. S., Oliveira, S., van Nostrum, C. F., et al. (2018). Insights into maleimide-thiol conjugation chemistry: Conditions for efficient surface functionalization of nanoparticles for receptor targeting. Journal of Controlled Release, 282, 101–109.
     Article Google Scholar
141. Cengiz, B., Ejderyan, N., & Sanyal, A. (2022). Functional polymeric coatings: thiol-maleimide ‘click’chemistry as a powerful surface functionalization tool. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part A, 1–13.
142. Kolb, H. C., Finn, M., & Sharpless, K. B. (2001). Click chemistry: Diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 40(11), 2004–2021.
     Article Google Scholar
143. Oria, L., Aguado, R., Pomposo, J. A., & Colmenero, J. (2010). A versatile “click” chemistry precursor of functional polystyrene nanoparticles. Advanced Materials, 22(28), 3038–3041.
     Article Google Scholar
144. Yao, V. J., D'Angelo, S., Butler, K. S., Theron, C., Smith, T. L., Marchiò, S., et al. (2016). Ligand-targeted theranostic nanomedicines against cancer. Journal of Controlled Release, 240, 267–286.
     Article Google Scholar
145. Conde, J., Dias, J. T., Grazú, V., Moros, M., Baptista, P. V., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2014). Revisiting 30 years of biofunctionalization and surface chemistry of inorganic nanoparticles for nanomedicine. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2, 48.
     Article Google Scholar
146. Zhang, L., Mazouzi, Y., Salmain, M., Liedberg, B., & Boujday, S. (2020). Antibody-gold nanoparticle bioconjugates for biosensors: synthesis, characterization and selected applications. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 165, 112370.
     Article Google Scholar
147. Yoon, H. Y., Lee, D., Lim, D. K., Koo, H., & Kim, K. (2022). Copper-free click chemistry: Applications in drug delivery, cell tracking, and tissue engineering. Advanced Materials, 34(10), 2107192.
     Article Google Scholar
148. Pan, Z., Fang, D., Song, N., Song, Y., Ding, M., Li, J., et al. (2017). Surface distribution and biophysicochemical properties of polymeric micelles bearing gemini cationic and hydrophilic groups. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9(3), 2138–2149.
     Article Google Scholar
149. Liu, J., Li, J., Zhang, Z., Weng, Y., Chen, G., Yuan, B., et al. (2014). Encapsulation of hydrophobic phthalocyanine with poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)/lipid composite microspheres for thermo-responsive release and photodynamic therapy. Materials, 7(5), 3481–3493.
     Article Google Scholar
150. Zhu, H., & McShane, M. J. (2005). Loading of hydrophobic materials into polymer particles: implications for fluorescent nanosensors and drug delivery. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 127(39), 13448–13449.
     Article Google Scholar
151. Wang, Z., Wang, L., Prabhakar, N., Xing, Y., Rosenholm, J. M., Zhang, J., et al. (2019). CaP coated mesoporous polydopamine nanoparticles with responsive membrane permeation ability for combined photothermal and siRNA therapy. Acta Biomaterialia, 86, 416–428.
     Article Google Scholar
152. Ping, Y., Guo, J., Ejima, H., Chen, X., Richardson, J. J., Sun, H., et al. (2015). pH-responsive capsules engineered from metal–phenolic networks for anticancer drug delivery. Small, 11(17), 2032–2036.
     Article Google Scholar
153. Wu, Y., Guo, J., Yang, W., Wang, C., & Fu, S. (2006). Preparation and characterization of chitosan–poly (acrylic acid) polymer magnetic microspheres. Polymer, 47(15), 5287–5294.
     Article Google Scholar
154. Senthilkumar, T., Lv, F., Zhao, H., Liu, L., & Wang, S. (2019). Conjugated polymer nanogel binding anticancer drug through hydrogen bonds for sustainable drug delivery. ACS Applied Bio Materials, 2(12), 6012–6020.
     Article Google Scholar
155. Ke, X., Tang, H., & Mao, H.-Q. (2019). Effective encapsulation of curcumin in nanoparticles enabled by hydrogen bonding using flash nanocomplexation. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 564, 273–280.
     Article Google Scholar
156. Huang, Y., Mao, K., Zhang, B., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles conjugated with folic acid for dual target-specific drug delivery and MRI in cancer theranostics. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 70, 763–771.
     Article Google Scholar
157. Chechetka, S. A., Yu, Y., Zhen, X., Pramanik, M., Pu, K., & Miyako, E. (2017). Light-driven liquid metal nanotransformers for biomedical theranostics. Nature Communications, 8(1), 1–19.
     Article Google Scholar
158. Sirianni, R. W., Zheng, M.-Q., Patel, T. R., Shafbauer, T., Zhou, J., Saltzman, W. M., et al. (2014). Radiolabeling of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)(PLGA) nanoparticles with biotinylated F-18 prosthetic groups and imaging of their delivery to the brain with positron emission tomography. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 25(12), 2157–2165.
     Article Google Scholar
159. Nash, M. A., Yager, P., Hoffman, A. S., & Stayton, P. S. (2010). Mixed stimuli-responsive magnetic and gold nanoparticle system for rapid purification, enrichment, and detection of biomarkers. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 21(12), 2197–2204.
     Article Google Scholar
160. Feczkó, T., Piiper, A., Pleli, T., Schmithals, C., Denk, D., Hehlgans, S., et al. (2019). Theranostic sorafenib-loaded polymeric nanocarriers manufactured by enhanced gadolinium conjugation techniques. Pharmaceutics, 11(10), 489.
     Article Google Scholar
161. Ke, C.-S., Fang, C.-C., Yan, J.-Y., Tseng, P.-J., Pyle, J. R., Chen, C.-P., et al. (2017). Molecular engineering and design of semiconducting polymer dots with narrow-band, near-infrared emission for in vivo biological imaging. ACS Nano, 11(3), 3166–3177.
     Article Google Scholar
162. Asem, H., Zhao, Y., Ye, F., Barrefelt, Å., Abedi-Valugerdi, M., El-Sayed, R., et al. (2016). Biodistribution of biodegradable polymeric nano-carriers loaded with busulphan and designed for multimodal imaging. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 14(1), 1–16.
     Article Google Scholar
163. Hasannia, M., Abnous, K., Taghdisi, S. M., Nekooei, S., Ramezani, M., & Alibolandi, M. (2022). Synthesis of doxorubicin-loaded peptosomes hybridized with gold nanorod for targeted drug delivery and CT imaging of metastatic breast cancer. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 20(1), 1–27.
     Article Google Scholar
164. Sun, M., Guo, J., Hao, H., Tong, T., Wang, K., & Gao, W. (2018). Tumour-homing chimeric polypeptide-conjugated polypyrrole nanoparticles for imaging-guided synergistic photothermal and chemical therapy of cancer. Theranostics, 8(10), 2634.
     Article Google Scholar
165. Jin, G., He, R., Liu, Q., Dong, Y., Lin, M., Li, W., et al. (2018). Theranostics of triple-negative breast cancer based on conjugated polymer nanoparticles. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 10(13), 10634–10646.
     Article Google Scholar
166. Soultan, A. H., Lambrechts, D., Verheyen, T., Van Gorp, H., Roeffaers, M. B., Smet, M., et al. (2019). Nanocarrier systems assembled from PEGylated hyperbranched poly (arylene oxindole). European Polymer Journal, 119, 247–259.
     Article Google Scholar
167. Wei, J., Shuai, X., Wang, R., He, X., Li, Y., Ding, M., et al. (2017). Clickable and imageable multiblock polymer micelles with magnetically guided and PEG-switched targeting and release property for precise tumor theranosis. Biomaterials, 145, 138–153.
     Article Google Scholar
168. Liu, R., Zhao, J., Han, G., Zhao, T., Zhang, R., Liu, B., et al. (2017). Click-functionalized SERS nanoprobes with improved labeling efficiency and capability for cancer cell imaging. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9(44), 38222–38229.
     Article Google Scholar
169. Li, Y., Wu, Y., Chen, J., Wan, J., Xiao, C., Guan, J., et al. (2019). A simple glutathione-responsive turn-on theranostic nanoparticle for dual-modal imaging and chemo-photothermal combination therapy. Nano Letters, 19(8), 5806–5817.
     Article Google Scholar
170. Escobedo, J. O., Rusin, O., Lim, S., & Strongin, R. M. (2010). NIR dyes for bioimaging applications. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 14(1), 64–70.
     Article Google Scholar
171. Kalchenko, V., Shivtiel, S., Malina, V., Lapid, K., Haramati, S., Lapidot, T., et al. (2006). Use of lipophilic near-infrared dye in whole-body optical imaging of hematopoietic cell homing. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 11(5), 050507.
     Article Google Scholar
172. He, X., Bao, X., Cao, H., Zhang, Z., Yin, Q., Gu, W., et al. (2015). Tumor-Penetrating Nanotherapeutics Loading a Near-Infrared Probe Inhibit Growth and Metastasis of Breast Cancer. Advanced Functional Materials, 25(19), 2831–2839.
     Article Google Scholar
173. Nogues, I. F. T., Goutayer, M., Da Silva, A., Guyon, L., Djaker, N., Josserand, V., et al. (2009). Cyanine-loaded lipid nanoparticles for improved in vivo fluorescence imaging. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 14(5), 054005.
     Article Google Scholar
174. Cao, S., Pei, Z., Xu, Y., & Pei, Y. (2016). Glyco-nanovesicles with activatable near-infrared probes for real-time monitoring of drug release and targeted delivery. Chemistry of Materials, 28(12), 4501–4506.
     Article Google Scholar
175. Lee, M. H., Yang, Z., Lim, C. W., Lee, Y. H., Dongbang, S., Kang, C., et al. (2013). Disulfide-cleavage-triggered chemosensors and their biological applications. Chemical Reviews, 113(7), 5071–5109.
     Article Google Scholar
176. Perera, K., Nguyen, D. X., Wang, D., Kuriakose, A. E., Yang, J., Nguyen, K. T., et al. (2022). Biodegradable and Inherently Fluorescent pH-Responsive Nanoparticles for Cancer Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutical Research, 1-15.
177. Al Tameemi, W., Dale, T. P., Al-Jumaily, R. M. K., & Forsyth, N. R. (2019). Hypoxia-modified cancer cell metabolism. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 7, 4.
     Article Google Scholar
178. Justus, C. R., Dong, L., & Yang, L. V. (2013). Acidic tumor microenvironment and pH-sensing G protein-coupled receptors. Frontiers in Physiology, 4, 354.
     Article Google Scholar
179. Zhang, Q., Weber, C., Schubert, U. S., & Hoogenboom, R. (2017). Thermoresponsive polymers with lower critical solution temperature: from fundamental aspects and measuring techniques to recommended turbidimetry conditions. Materials Horizons, 4(2), 109–116.
     Article Google Scholar
180. Nagy-Simon, T., Diaconu, O., Focsan, M., Vulpoi, A., Botiz, I., & Craciun, A.-M. (2021). Pluronic stabilized conjugated polymer nanoparticles for NIR fluorescence imaging and dual phototherapy applications. Journal of Molecular Structure, 1243, 130931.
     Article Google Scholar
181. Zhu, H., Fang, Y., Miao, Q., Qi, X., Ding, D., Chen, P., et al. (2017). Regulating near-infrared photodynamic properties of semiconducting polymer nanotheranostics for optimized cancer therapy. ACS Nano, 11(9), 8998–9009.
     Article Google Scholar
182. Rohatgi, C. V., Harada, T., Need, E. F., Krasowska, M., Beattie, D. A., Dickenson, G. D., et al. (2018). Low-bandgap conjugated polymer dots for near-infrared fluorescence imaging. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 1(9), 4801–4808.
     Article Google Scholar
183. Seo, D., Park, J., Shin, T. J., Yoo, P. J., Park, J., & Kwak, K. (2015). Bathochromic shift in absorption spectra of conjugated polymer nanoparticles with displacement along backbones. Macromolecular Research, 23(6), 574–577.
     Article Google Scholar
184. Botiz, I., Freyberg, P., Leordean, C., Gabudean, A.-M., Astilean, S., Yang, A. C.-M., et al. (2015). Emission properties of MEH-PPV in thin films simultaneously illuminated and annealed at different temperatures. Synthetic Metals, 199, 33–36.
     Article Google Scholar
185. Botiz, I., Codescu, M.-A., Farcau, C., Leordean, C., Astilean, S., Silva, C., et al. (2017). Convective self-assembly of π-conjugated oligomers and polymers. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 5(10), 2513–2518.
     Article Google Scholar
186. Cai, H., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Sun, L., Pan, D., Gong, Q., et al. (2018). Enzyme-sensitive biodegradable and multifunctional polymeric conjugate as theranostic nanomedicine. Applied Materials Today, 11, 207–218.
     Article Google Scholar
187. Lock, L. L., Cheetham, A. G., Zhang, P., & Cui, H. (2013). Design and construction of supramolecular nanobeacons for enzyme detection. ACS Nano, 7(6), 4924–4932.
     Article Google Scholar
188. Schneider, G. F., Subr, V., Ulbrich, K., & Decher, G. (2009). Multifunctional cytotoxic stealth nanoparticles. A model approach with potential for cancer therapy. Nano Letters, 9(2), 636–642.
     Article Google Scholar
189. Luo, K., Yang, J., Kopečková, P., & Ji, K. (2011). Biodegradable multiblock poly [N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide] via reversible addition− fragmentation chain transfer polymerization and click chemistry. Macromolecules, 44(8), 2481–2488.
     Article Google Scholar
190. Key, J., Aryal, S., Gentile, F., Ananta, J. S., Zhong, M., Landis, M. D., et al. (2013). Engineering discoidal polymeric nanoconstructs with enhanced magneto-optical properties for tumor imaging. Biomaterials, 34(21), 5402–5410.
     Article Google Scholar
191. Kolouchova, K., Groborz, O., Cernochova, Z., Skarkova, A., Brabek, J., Rosel, D., et al. (2021). Thermo-and ROS-responsive self-assembled polymer nanoparticle tracers for 19F MRI theranostics. Biomacromolecules, 22(6), 2325–2337.
     Article Google Scholar
192. Sarkar, S., Graham-Gurysh, E. G., MacNeill, C. M., Kelkar, S., McCarthy, B. D., Mohs, A., et al. (2020). Variable molecular weight nanoparticles for near-infrared fluorescence imaging and photothermal ablation. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2(10), 4162–4170.
     Article Google Scholar
193. Min, H. S., You, D. G., Son, S., Jeon, S., Park, J. H., Lee, S., et al. (2015). Echogenic glycol chitosan nanoparticles for ultrasound-triggered cancer theranostics. Theranostics, 5(12), 1402.
     Article Google Scholar
194. Cao, Z., Feng, L., Zhang, G., Wang, J., Shen, S., Li, D., et al. (2018). Semiconducting polymer-based nanoparticles with strong absorbance in NIR-II window for in vivo photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging. Biomaterials, 155, 103–111.
     Article Google Scholar
195. Goos, J. A., Cho, A., Carter, L. M., Dilling, T. R., Davydova, M., Mandleywala, K., et al. (2020). Delivery of polymeric nanostars for molecular imaging and endoradiotherapy through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Theranostics, 10(2), 567.
     Article Google Scholar
196. Ho, L.-C., Hsu, C.-H., Ou, C.-M., Wang, C.-W., Liu, T.-P., Hwang, L.-P., et al. (2015). Unibody core–shell smart polymer as a theranostic nanoparticle for drug delivery and MR imaging. Biomaterials, 37, 436–446.
     Article Google Scholar
197. Lee, J., Min, H.-S., You, D. G., Kim, K., Kwon, I. C., Rhim, T., et al. (2016). Theranostic gas-generating nanoparticles for targeted ultrasound imaging and treatment of neuroblastoma. Journal of Controlled Release, 223, 197–206.
     Article Google Scholar
198. Kumar, P., Wu, H., McBride, J. L., Jung, K.-E., Hee Kim, M., Davidson, B. L., et al. (2007). Transvascular delivery of small interfering RNA to the central nervous system. Nature, 448(7149), 39–43.
     Article Google Scholar
199. Son, S., Jang, J., Youn, H., Lee, S., Lee, D., Lee, Y.-S., et al. (2011). A brain-targeted rabies virus glycoprotein-disulfide linked PEI nanocarrier for delivery of neurogenic microRNA. Biomaterials, 32(21), 4968–4975.
     Article Google Scholar
200. Chung, M. F., Chen, K. J., Liang, H. F., Liao, Z. X., Chia, W. T., Xia, Y., et al. (2012). A liposomal system capable of generating CO2 bubbles to induce transient cavitation, lysosomal rupturing, and cell necrosis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51(40), 10089–10093.
     Article Google Scholar
201. McCarthy B, Cudykier A, Singh R, Levi-Polyachenko N, Soker S. (2021). Semiconducting polymer nanoparticles for photothermal ablation of colorectal cancer organoids. Scientific Reports 11(1), 1-12.
202. Wielenga, V. J., Heider, K.-H., Johan, G., Offerhaus, A., Adolf, G. R., van den Berg, F. M., et al. (1993). Expression of CD44 variant proteins in human colorectal cancer is related to tumor progression. Cancer Research, 53(20), 4754–4756.
     Google Scholar
203. Shao, J., Liang, R., Ding, D., Zheng, X., Zhu, X., Hu, S., et al. (2021). A Smart multifunctional nanoparticle for enhanced near-infrared image-guided photothermal therapy against gastric cancer. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 16, 2897.
     Article Google Scholar
204. Yang, Z., Cheng, R., Zhao, C., Sun, N., Luo, H., Chen, Y., et al. (2018). Thermo-and pH-dual responsive polymeric micelles with upper critical solution temperature behavior for photoacoustic imaging-guided synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy against subcutaneous and metastatic breast tumors. Theranostics, 8(15), 4097.
     Article Google Scholar
205. Yan, L., & Qiu, L. (2015). Indocyanine green targeted micelles with improved stability for near-infrared image-guided photothermal tumor therapy. Nanomedicine, 10(3), 361–373.
     Article Google Scholar
206. Böger, C., Warneke, V. S., Behrens, H.-M., Kalthoff, H., Goodman, S. L., Becker, T., et al. (2015). Integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5 as prognostic, diagnostic, and therapeutic targets in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer, 18(4), 784–795.
     Article Google Scholar
207. Lisanti, M. P., Martinez-Outschoorn, U. E., Lin, Z., Pavlides, S., Whitaker-Menezes, D., Pestell, R. G., et al. (2011). Hydrogen peroxide fuels aging, inflammation, cancer metabolism and metastasis: the seed and soil also needs" fertilizer". Cell Cycle, 10(15), 2440–2449.
     Article Google Scholar
208. Pellosi, D. S., Calori, I. R., de Paula, L. B., Hioka, N., Quaglia, F., & Tedesco, A. C. (2017). Multifunctional theranostic Pluronic mixed micelles improve targeted photoactivity of Verteporfin in cancer cells. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 71, 1–9.
     Article Google Scholar
209. Ren, W. X., Han, J., Uhm, S., Jang, Y. J., Kang, C., Kim, J.-H., et al. (2015). Recent development of biotin conjugation in biological imaging, sensing, and target delivery. Chemical Communications, 51(52), 10403–10418.
     Article Google Scholar
210. Vadlapudi, A. D., Vadlapatla, R. K., Pal, D., & Mitra, A. K. (2013). Biotin uptake by T47D breast cancer cells: functional and molecular evidence of sodium-dependent multivitamin transporter (SMVT). International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 441(1-2), 535–543.
     Article Google Scholar
211. Li, J., Cai, P., Shalviri, A., Henderson, J. T., He, C., Foltz, W. D., et al. (2014). A multifunctional polymeric nanotheranostic system delivers doxorubicin and imaging agents across the blood–brain barrier targeting brain metastases of breast cancer. ACS Nano, 8(10), 9925–9940.
     Article Google Scholar
212. Kreuter, J. (2013). Mechanism of polymeric nanoparticle-based drug transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Journal of Microencapsulation, 30(1), 49–54.
     Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
213. Kreuter, J., Hekmatara, T., Dreis, S., Vogel, T., Gelperina, S., & Langer, K. (2007). Covalent attachment of apolipoprotein AI and apolipoprotein B-100 to albumin nanoparticles enables drug transport into the brain. Journal of Controlled Release, 118(1), 54–58.
     Article Google Scholar
214. Cong, Z., Zhang, L., Ma, S.-Q., Lam, K. S., Yang, F.-F., & Liao, Y.-H. (2020). Size-transformable hyaluronan stacked self-assembling peptide nanoparticles for improved transcellular tumor penetration and photo–chemo combination therapy. ACS Nano, 14(2), 1958–1970.
     Article Google Scholar
215. Son, J., Yang, S. M., Yi, G., Roh, Y. J., Park, H., Park, J. M., et al. (2018). Folate-modified PLGA nanoparticles for tumor-targeted delivery of pheophorbide a in vivo. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 498(3), 523–528.
     Article Google Scholar
216. Yang, Y., Zhang, Y.-M., Li, D., Sun, H.-L., Fan, H.-X., & Liu, Y. (2016). Camptothecin–polysaccharide co-assembly and its controlled release. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 27(12), 2834–2838.
     Article Google Scholar
217. Liu, Y., Feng, L., Liu, T., Zhang, L., Yao, Y., Yu, D., et al. (2014). Multifunctional pH-sensitive polymeric nanoparticles for theranostics evaluated experimentally in cancer. Nanoscale, 6(6), 3231–3242.
     Article Google Scholar
218. Xiao, Y., Hong, H., Javadi, A., Engle, J. W., Xu, W., Yang, Y., et al. (2012). Multifunctional unimolecular micelles for cancer-targeted drug delivery and positron emission tomography imaging. Biomaterials, 33(11), 3071–3082.
     Article Google Scholar
219. Santra, S., & Perez, J. M. (2011). Selective N-alkylation of β-alanine facilitates the synthesis of a poly (amino acid)-based theranostic nanoagent. Biomacromolecules, 12(11), 3917–3927.
     Article Google Scholar
220. Hua, S., De Matos, M. B., Metselaar, J. M., & Storm, G. (2018). Current trends and challenges in the clinical translation of nanoparticulate nanomedicines: pathways for translational development and commercialization. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 790.
     Article Google Scholar
221. Luque-Michel, E., Imbuluzqueta, E., Sebastián, V., & Blanco-Prieto, M. J. (2017). Clinical advances of nanocarrier-based cancer therapy and diagnostics. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 14(1), 75–92.
     Article Google Scholar
222. Kim, T.-Y., Kim, D.-W., Chung, J.-Y., Shin, S. G., Kim, S.-C., Heo, D. S., et al. (2004). Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of Genexol-PM, a cremophor-free, polymeric micelle-formulated paclitaxel, in patients with advanced malignancies. Clinical Cancer Research, 10(11), 3708–3716.
     Article Google Scholar
223. Lee, K. S., Chung, H. C., Im, S. A., Park, Y. H., Kim, C. S., Kim, S.-B., et al. (2008). Multicenter phase II trial of Genexol-PM, a Cremophor-free, polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel, in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 108, 241–250.
     Article Google Scholar
224. Podoltsev, N., Rubin, M., Figueroa, J., Lee, M., Kwon, J., Yu, J., et al. (2008). Phase II clinical trial of paclitaxel loaded polymeric micelle (GPM) in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC): Final results. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26(15_suppl), 4627.
     Article Google Scholar
225. Kim, D.-W., Kim, S.-Y., Kim, H.-K., Kim, S.-W., Shin, S., Kim, J., et al. (2007). Multicenter phase II trial of Genexol-PM, a novel Cremophor-free, polymeric micelle formulation of paclitaxel, with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Annals of Oncology, 18(12), 2009–2014.
     Article Google Scholar
226. Kim, C., Bae, S., Lee, N., Lee, K., Park, S., Kim, D., et al. (2006). Phase II study of Genexol (paclitaxel) and carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(18_suppl), 17049.
     Article Google Scholar
227. Matsumura, Y. (2008). Poly (amino acid) micelle nanocarriers in preclinical and clinical studies. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews., 60(8), 899–914.
     Article Google Scholar
228. Matsumura, Y. (2008). Polymeric micellar delivery systems in oncology. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(12), 793–802.
     Article Google Scholar
229. Burris, H., III, Infante, J., Spigel, D., Greco, F., Thompson, D., Matsumoto, S., et al. (2008). A phase I dose-escalation study of NK012. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26(15_suppl), 2538.
     Article Google Scholar
230. Kato, K. (2008). PhaseI study of NK012, polymer micelle SN-38, in patients with advanced cancer. Proc Ams Soc Clin Oncol GI.
231. Matsumura, Y., & Kataoka, K. (2009). Preclinical and clinical studies of anticancer agent-incorporating polymer micelles. Cancer Science, 100(4), 572–579.
     Article Google Scholar
232. Caster, J. M., Patel, A. N., Zhang, T., & Wang, A. (2017). Investigational nanomedicines in 2016: a review of nanotherapeutics currently undergoing clinical trials. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 9(1), e1416.
     Google Scholar
233. Danson, S., Ferry, D., Alakhov, V., Margison, J., Kerr, D., Jowle, D., et al. (2004). Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of pluronic polymer-bound doxorubicin (SP1049C) in patients with advanced cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 90(11), 2085–2091.
     Article Google Scholar
234. Armstrong, A., Brewer, J., Newman, C., Alakhov, V., Pietrzynski, G., Campbell, S., et al. (2006). SP1049C as first-line therapy in advanced (inoperable or metastatic) adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: a phase II window study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(18_suppl), 4080.
     Article Google Scholar
235. Valle, J., Lawrance, J., Brewer, J., Clayton, A., Corrie, P., Alakhov, V., et al. (2004). A phase II, window study of SP1049C as first-line therapy in inoperable metastatic adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(14_suppl), 4195.
     Article Google Scholar
236. Ventola, C. L. (2017). Progress in nanomedicine: approved and investigational nanodrugs. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 42(12), 742.
     Google Scholar
237. Weiss, G. J., Chao, J., Neidhart, J. D., Ramanathan, R. K., Bassett, D., Neidhart, J. A., et al. (2013). First-in-human phase 1/2a trial of CRLX101, a cyclodextrin-containing polymer-camptothecin nanopharmaceutical in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies. Investigational New Drugs, 31, 986–1000.
     Article Google Scholar

Download references